Solution

ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2021/prelims/mathematics-iv/6/c/solution

An equilibrium point has and . Since , the linearized displacement satisfies
Thus gives a stable equilibrium, while gives an unstable equilibrium point. More generally, a strict local minimum of is sufficient for stability by the conserved first integral in b. When , the second-derivative test alone is inconclusive, and the local shape of must be examined.
For the specified ellipse, put . Direct differentiation gives
Consequently, with and ,
Two equilibria always occur at . Any further equilibria must satisfy
To decide exactly when this is possible, view the equation as with . Its derivative is positive on , and it takes endpoint values and . Since implies , the complete list is:
  • If , there are four distinct equilibria modulo : , , and . For the additional positive angle lies in ; at the additional pair is ; for it lies in .
  • If , the additional pair merges with , leaving two distinct equilibria, and .
  • If , there are only the two equilibria and . In particular, does not introduce a missing case: the undivided bracket is then the positive constant , so there is no extra root.
These are positions of the bead at rest relative to the rotating hoop. No stability classification of the particular ellipse is needed.

New to topics? Read the docs here!