Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mphil-in-micro-and-nanotechnology-enterprise-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2018/paper-2/section-b/21a/iv/solution
Past exam of the MPhil in micro- and nanotechnology enterprise course of the University of Cambridge 2018 Paper 2 Section B 21A iv Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-20
The literal curve is monotone increasing from at toward zero from below as :Taken literally at a zero gap, it predicts an unbounded collapse energy and force. That extrapolation is outside the far-field dipole approximation and cannot describe actual touching matter.
Finite atomic/ionic dimensions, electronic overlap and Pauli repulsion supply short-distance constraints. Solvent and hydration layers, steric coatings and surface chemistry can add further contributions. An illustrative regularized model is with ; it has a finite minimum at and becomes repulsive at shorter distances. This is a schematic regularization, not a derived complete ion–sphere contact law.
Separately, correcting the center-distance convention to already removes this particular divergence from the far-field expression, but does not make a dipole approximation accurate at contact. Near-field multipoles and microscopic repulsion still require a better model. Calibrated colloidal probe technique measurements can test where a long-range force model ceases to agree with actual approach curves.[ref]
direct measurement of colloidal forces using an atomic force microscope by William A. Ducker and others. 1991, pp.239–241, sphere–plane force measurements and short-range deviations
New to topics? Read the docs here!