 Solution

A detector too slow to resolve a femtosecond field can measure its integrated nonlinear response instead. Split the pulse, delay one replica, overlap both in a thin phase-matched crystal, and select the sum-frequency signal. For negligible depletion and sufficiently broad phase matching, the cross-generated field is proportional to $A(t)A(t-\tau )$; integrated signal gives the second-harmonic intensity autocorrelationA noncollinear geometry can reject each replica's individual second harmonic. The optical response supplies the fast gate while the detector integrates slowly. Crystal thickness, group-velocity mismatch, spectral acceptance, beam overlap and delay calibration limit resolution.

For a Gaussian pulse specified by its intensity profile, the autocorrelation's full width at half maximum is $\sqrt{2}$ times the intensity full width at half maximum. For a sech-squared intensity profile the ratio is about $1.543$. These are model-dependent conversion factors. An intensity autocorrelation is symmetric in delay and loses phase information; different pulses can share it. An interferometric autocorrelation retains rapid carrier fringes but still does not generally reconstruct an arbitrary complex field uniquely.

frequency-resolved optical gating also resolves the gated signal's spectrum, giving a two-dimensional delay-frequency record. For second-harmonic frequency-resolved optical gating,where $\omega$ is measured relative to the signal's carrier. An iterative retrieval seeks an envelope whose predicted record matches the measurement. Alternatively, polarization-gating frequency-resolved optical gating uses the optical Kerr effect to gate the probe by a delayed replica's intensity, with signal envelope proportional to $A(t)|A(t-\tau ){|}^2$. The original FROG work introduced nonlinear optical gating plus spectral resolution to characterize arbitrary femtosecond pulses.^[ref]

Absolute wave phase and absolute time origin remain undetermined by these intensity records. The SHG record also cannot distinguish $A(t)$ from $A^{\ast }(-t)$, so its time-direction ambiguity remains. Retrieval agreement, an independently measured spectrum, adequate signal dynamic range and gate-response calibration are practical consistency checks. A pulse train that changes between shots can yield an averaged record that no single pulse faithfully represents. Thus nonlinear gating solves the detector-speed problem but does not remove inverse problem ambiguities or experimental limitations.