Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-philosophy-of-science-supplementary-subject-of-the-university-of-oxford/2017/2/solution
Past exam of the philosophy of science supplementary subject of the University of Oxford 2017 2 Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
There are substantial changes in scientific concepts and practice: the Chemical Revolution and the transition from Newtonian mechanics to special relativity are concrete examples. Whether every such episode fits one universal pattern of revolutionary theory change is a further historical claim. Thomas Kuhn contrasts normal science within an accepted scientific paradigm with changes in the standards and exemplary problems that organize a field.[ref]
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn. Introduction: normal science and noncumulative change
Three philosophical difficulties follow. First, scientific progress cannot simply mean retaining every old theoretical assertion: special relativity revises absolute simultaneity, while recovering useful low-speed predictions. Second, incommensurability raises questions about comparison when terms, methods or explanatory priorities change. Third, agreement on a theory may involve judgments about simplicity, explanatory scope and promising future work, so rational choice need not be an algorithm uniquely determined by the current measurements.
None of these difficulties establishes that comparison is impossible. In the mechanical example, the expansion of the Lorentz factor, , displays a controlled regime where the newer account recovers earlier approximations. Shared numerical readings, overlapping experimental techniques and successful predictions beyond the old domain permit assessment even without identical theoretical vocabularies. Incommensurability can mean incomplete translation or changing standards without meaning that every disagreement is beyond argument.
A reasonable position accepts revolutionary theory change while rejecting the stronger inference that all standards are arbitrary. Rational comparison can be plural, historically situated and fallible. It should specify the preserved successes, newly explained phenomena and costs of a proposed change. The existence of dramatic transitions refutes a picture of wholly cumulative truth accumulation; it does not by itself refute evidence-based scientific progress.
New to topics? Read the docs here!