 Solution

Let ${\lambda }_1=589.0\mathrm{nm}$, ${\lambda }_2=589.6\mathrm{nm}$ and $\Delta \lambda =0.6\mathrm{nm}$. Requiring the separation to be at least $100$ times the measured full width at half maximum means a width no larger than $0.006\mathrm{nm}$, or a resolving power of approximately $589.3/0.006\simeq 9.8\times 10^4$.

The etalon resolving power and order overlap constraints are particularly clear in frequency. Put $\Delta \nu =c|1/{\lambda }_1-1/{\lambda }_2|$. At normal incidence, the free spectral range is ${\nu }_{\mathrm{FSR}}=c/(2d)$ and the instrumental width is $\delta \nu ={\nu }_{\mathrm{FSR}}/\mathcal{F}$. ThusAvoiding ambiguity between the doublet and adjacent interference orders requires a free spectral range exceeding the doublet separation:Together these giveUsing the narrow-peak finesse from the previous part, $\pi \sqrt{R}/(1-R)>100$ gives $\boxed{R\gtrsim 0.9691}$, with a practical margin above that limiting value. At the exact limit, the gap between orders vanishes, so equality is not a sensible operating point.

One feasible ideal design is $R=0.99$, $\mathcal{F}\simeq 313$, and $d=0.14018\mathrm{mm}$. It has an approximate wavelength free spectral range of $1.24\mathrm{nm}$ and instrumental width $0.0040\mathrm{nm}$ near the doublet. The doublet spacing is about $151$ widths. Even the spacing to the nearest replica of the other line exceeds $100$ widths in this example. If that latter separation is also required in general, impose the stronger condition $\min (\Delta \nu ,{\nu }_{\mathrm{FSR}}-\Delta \nu )\ge 100{\nu }_{\mathrm{FSR}}/\mathcal{F}$, rather than just the two basic inequalities.

Such mirror reflectivities and submillimetre gaps are plausible for a high-quality Fabry–Pérot etalon. Flatness, parallelism, coating loss, angular spread, mechanical stability and source width limit the achieved finesse. A wavelength width of $0.004\mathrm{nm}$ corresponds to a gap variation of order $d\delta \lambda /\lambda \simeq 1\mathrm{nm}$, so the ideal coating-limited estimate demands stringent uniformity. The paper expressly excludes intrinsic source broadening.

The first panel is the fixed etalon's transmission versus wavelength, a comb of resonances. It does not by itself have one peak at each sodium line. The second panel shows the two peaks obtained by scanning the etalon phase or gap and calibrating the scan to wavelength. A fixed-gap output spectrum is instead the incident spectrum multiplied by the transmission function. This distinction is needed to interpret a doublet measurement correctly.