The finesse of a Fabry–Pérot interferometer is its free spectral range divided by a transmission peak's full width at half maximum. Large finesse means a narrow accepted frequency interval compared with the spacing between repeated orders. Here half maximum means of the ideal unit peak, with zero detector background subtracted; it does not mean halfway between the transmission minimum and maximum.
Write for the coefficient multiplying in Fabry–Pérot transmission from multiple reflections. This coefficient is sometimes called the coefficient of finesse; it is not the finesse . About a resonance , put . Solving givesand, since one free spectral range advances the wave phase by ,These are exact for the ideal nondispersive model with constant and linear frequency dependence of . The inverse sine requires , or . At equality, neighbouring peaks merely touch half maximum at their shared minima: the nominal width is one full free spectral range and . Isolated half-maximum peaks require the strict inequality. Below this threshold the transmission never falls to , so this peak-width definition supplies no finesse; at the transmission is flat.
For large reflectivity, the small-angle approximation givesThis is a high-reflectivity approximation, not an identity for every . The original dimensionless examples below have exact full width at half maximum values obtained from the inverse sine formula.
Increasing mirror reflectivity narrows Fabry–Pérot interferometer transmission peaks
. Original stipulated dimensionless model for , with and modulo . All curves peak at unity and repeat after . The second panel enlarges the central resonance; coloured segments at mark each exact full width at half maximum. The inset compares exact finesse with the high-reflectivity approximation. These are calculations, not measured scans. Details.The beauty of the narrowing is visible directly in the geometric series: large preserves contributions from many round trips, so a small phase difference accumulates across many terms and spoils their addition. For the stipulated vacuum gap, gives an ideal full width at half maximum of about . This instrumental width is not a measured spectral line width. A real scan also depends on the source profile, accepted angles, mirror shape, alignment, and scan stability. The University of Washington handout separately discusses mirror-reflectivity, mirror-flatness, and detector-pinhole contributions; increasing alone cannot remove the others.[ref]
Fabry-Perot Interferometer, University of Washington Physics 331. Finesse discussion, equations (5)–(8), and §2.3 Determine the Finesse
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.
