Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-quantum-condensed-matter-field-theory-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2012/paper-1/2/c/solution
Past exam of the quantum Condensed Matter Field Theory course of the University of Cambridge 2012 Paper 1 2 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-20
Use the reduced attractive reduced BCS pairing Hamiltonian with volume V, and attraction :A specified pairing shell or an ultraviolet renormalization is part of the model. The trace is grand canonical. Insert fermionic coherent states into its time-sliced trace. The resulting Grassmann variables are antiperiodic, and with inverse-energy imaginary time the dimensionless action isThis boundary condition is essential for Fermi-Dirac statistics; replacing it by a bosonic periodic trace changes the answer. A complex Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation uses the local identitywith time-slice factors understood. The pairing field renders the fermion action quadratic. For a uniform static field the independent Nambu spinor block hasIts determinant is . The phase-independent determinant sign cancels under consistent reference normalization. Integrating the fermions gives the BCS pairing-field effective action, , with the normal-ordering/reference term retained. The fermionic pairing-block determinant normalization uses one independent pairing block for every k; a fully doubled spin-particle-hole trace instead needs one half. The subtracted grand potential of the reduced BCS model is particularly unambiguous:Performing the Matsubara frequency sum yieldsup to a common constant. At zero gap this reduces exactly to the two-spin free-gas result. The Matsubara derivation of the BCS saddle follows by differentiating with respect to and using givesThe second equation fixes the chemical potential at specified number. This stationary action is BCS mean-field theory, not an exact integration of pairing-field fluctuations. With constant single-spin density of states per volume and a symmetric energy cutoff , weak coupling gives and . The zero-temperature condensation grand-potential density is to leading weak-coupling order; using a spin-summed density would change these displayed factors. The BCS coherence factors are and , and the associated BCS ground state is the normalized product of empty and occupied pair states. [ref]
Lecture Notes for Quantum Matter by Steven H. Simon. Chapter11, BCS variational state, coherence factors, gap and thermal occupations
Allowing a slowly varying complex pairing field generates phase stiffness and, near the transition, the Ginzburg-Landau theory of superconductivity. A neutral paired system has a gapless phase sound mode; in a charged bulk superconductor electromagnetic coupling produces the Anderson-Higgs mechanism in a superconductor and the Meissner effect. These collective fluctuations are distinct from the gapped fermionic excitations. A microscopic dynamical calculation is needed to fix collective-mode dispersion and damping; the static saddle alone does not determine them. [ref]
Physics 215C: Quantum Field Theory, Part 3 by John McGreevy. §§3.1–3.2, coherent-state construction; §2.3, pair-field integration and charged phase dynamics
New to topics? Read the docs here!