Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-theoretical-physics-ii-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2012/paper-1/6/e/solution
Past exam of the theoretical physics II course of the University of Cambridge 2012 Paper 1 6 e Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-20
For small fixed positive , the stated approximate curve has maxima atIts formal minima are zero at . The peak height is the -wave unitarity limit, and the peaks narrow as decreases.
To identify the bound-state threshold, let the bound-state energy be with . The reduced radial wave is proportional to inside and outside, with and . Matching gives . As a new bound state emerges at ,Thus the limiting peak locations coincide with the appearance of successive -wave bound states. At the exact threshold the zero-energy radial solution is not square-integrable; a normalizable bound state appears just beyond it. Finite-energy maxima shift slightly from the zero-energy positions.
The formal minima require care because the assumption used in part d fails there. Retaining in the exact matching condition gives the spherical square-well scattering lengthaway from a threshold. At , , so the true low-energy S-wave scattering contribution is , not zero. Genuine leading-order zeros of that contribution instead satisfy , for example and . The original sketch compares the exact finite-energy wave with the requested approximation, making this nonuniformity visible. Dominance by the wave must be checked separately near a higher-partial-wave threshold. The scattering-length divergence and its bound-state interpretation are also derived in institutional lecture notes.[ref]
Topics in Quantum Mechanics by David Tong. 2017, §6.2.6, printed pp. 219–222: square-well matching, scattering length and threshold bound states
New to topics? Read the docs here!
