 Power broadening

In the two-level saturation population model, $p_e$ and the population-difference reduction $q$ reach half their resonant values at $|\Delta |=(\Gamma /2)\sqrt{1+s}$. Their half width at half maximum is therefore $(\Gamma /2)\sqrt{1+s}$ and their full width at half maximum is $W_{\omega }=\Gamma \sqrt{1+s}$ in angular frequency, or $W_{\nu }=W_{\omega }/(2\pi )$ in hertz. This is power broadening: stronger excitation addresses a wider range of detunings even though the lifetime has not changed.

Increasing $s$ improves the local population-difference reduction $q(0)=s/(1+s)$ but broadens the response. From $s=1$ to $s=9$, this reduction increases from $0.5$ to $0.9$, while the width increases from $\sqrt{2}\Gamma$ to $\sqrt{10}\Gamma$. The contrast approaches a limit and the width keeps growing. This single-atom width is not automatically the width of a velocity-averaged pump–probe feature.

For example, if the distribution of velocities is approximately constant across the narrow resonant classes, the population-only overlap integral contains two Lorentzian line shapes: a probe of half width $\gamma =\Gamma /2$ and a pump hole of half width $a=\gamma \sqrt{1+s}$. Their centres in $kv$ are separated by $2\delta$. The convolution of these profiles has half width $a+\gamma$ in that separation, so its full width at half maximum as a function of $\delta$ is $a+\gamma =(\Gamma /2)(1+\sqrt{1+s})$. Even this simplified pump–probe width differs from the single-atom power broadening formula. Finite Doppler broadening and coherent or multilevel effects require further analysis.