Reciprocal-estimation bias in randomized atom inclusion
ID: reciprocal-estimation-bias-in-randomized-atom-inclusion
Reciprocal-estimation bias in randomized atom inclusion quantifies the nonlinear plug-in loss beyond the sign supplied by Jensen's inequality. Keep the independent-calibration model of atom-probability error in a randomized endpoint rule: true atom probability , unbiased estimate , and included probability , with the upper endpoint calibrated to actual probability . Assume , , and .
The exact algebraic identitygivesThus the loss depends on squared errors weighted by the reciprocal estimated probability. The second-order delta method approximation is , but the exact remainder shows why small estimated probabilities deserve particular attention.
If almost surely for , a nonasymptotic bound isFor an original small-error example, let , let measurement calibration return or equally often, and take , . Here and the variance is . The exact included probability is about ; the second-order approximation is , while the bounded-error calculation puts the coverage loss between about and .
The bounded-relative-error assumption can fail for a finite binomial measurement calibration: an empirical atom fraction can be zero with positive probability. Such near-zero probability estimates in reciprocal plug-in rules require an explicitly defined guard or different measurement calibration model, not division by zero. The auxiliary endpoint decision must remain independent of the future duration and measurement calibration as stipulated. The documented uniform random-variates construction supplies that auxiliary randomness; it does not validate the atom estimate.[ref]
SciPy 1.16.2 documentation. scipy.stats.uniform, support and rvs
New to topics? Read the docs here!