Tail-model dependence of inferred density uncertainty

ID: tail-model-dependence-of-inferred-density-uncertainty

Tail-model dependence of inferred density uncertainty is the sensitivity of a density estimate's distribution to the assumed probability of very small positive thicknesses. For with fixed , a tiny thickness has disproportionate influence through . The main body of a thickness histogram can look stable while the inferred mean or variance remains model-dependent.
A gamma distribution and a lognormal distribution provide useful explicit models. NIST specifies their density functions and parameter conventions.[ref] At mean thickness and coefficient of variation , the gamma model has shape and gives
The lognormal model gives . The two agree closely for small , but that agreement concerns those model families, not every positive distribution with a similar spread.
An original rare-event example makes the limitation explicit. Let thickness be micrometres with probability and micrometres otherwise. Mean thickness is exactly 10 micrometres and its standard deviation is approximately 0.10 micrometres, about 1% of the mean. Nevertheless,
nearly twice the reciprocal of mean thickness. The rare component supplies about half the inverse moment. These are deliberately constructed model values, not measured polymer-layer dimensions.
Rare-thickness leverage on inverse moments can escape an apparently reassuring sample. With 1,000 independent thickness observations, the chance of seeing none of that rare component is . A finite simulation or a smooth fit to common observations need not validate the unobserved lower tail.
A useful experiment investigates whether dimensional resolution, specimen geometry or physical constraints rule out such near-zero layers. Report sensitivity to defensible alternative lower-tail models or measured lower bounds. Choosing a positive distribution guarantees positive thickness, but does not establish that its inverse moments describe the measurement process.
Figure 1.
An original two-point thickness model: a component appearing in only one of ten thousand observations supplies about half the expected reciprocal thickness, and therefore half the expected inferred density at fixed mass per area.
Details.

New to topics? Read the docs here!