For a narrow beam of monoenergetic photons crossing homogeneous material of thickness , the uncollided wave intensity obeys . Here is the linear attenuation coefficient, counting removal from the incident beam by photon absorption and scattering of light. It depends on photon energy and material; it is not universally independent of energy.[ref]
2. The Mass Attenuation Coefficient. Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients by John H. Hubbell and Stephen M. Seltzer; NIST, X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients, §2, Eq. (1), narrow monoenergetic beam and interaction contributions
An original derivation makes the model explicit. If each thin layer removes fraction of the surviving beam, with the same throughout, thenThus equal added thicknesses multiply transmission by the same factor. The ordinary differential equation describes uncollided beam survival. To test it with a detector, keep source output, distance, selected photon energy band and detector response fixed. Use a collimator and suitable detector acceptance to exclude scattering of light into the detector. Subtract background, measure an empty-path reference, and keep the detector in its linear operating range. A changing source distance adds geometric dilution and is not an attenuation measurement at fixed geometry.
For a stipulated example, take and . Transmission is . If the empty-path detector rate is , including background , the model predicts sample rate . Recover transmission as ; the raw ratio is biased. These chosen values are a calculation, not measurements of a particular material or a historical apparatus.
When X-ray transmission is exponential, and when spectral mixing bends it
. Original calculated examples, with stipulated linear attenuation coefficients in inverse millimetres. The left panel uses one photon energy and marks and the half-value layer. The right panel compares an equal-weight mixture of two photon energies with the exponential having the same initial slope. A logarithmic vertical axis turns a single exponential into a straight line. Neither curve is fitted to measured material data. Details. New to topics? Read the docs here!
