The problem as with many well known science communicators is that he falls too much on the basic side of the the missing link between basic and advanced.
Mentinoned at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Baggott quoting popsciencebooks.blogspot.com/2012/09/jim-baggott-four-way-interview.html
Ciro Santilli and Jim would get along mighty well: there is value in tutorials written by beginners.
His documentary style is mostly "travel to places" and "show equations without explaining them". But there is some value to that as well.
Official homepage: www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007x243/episodes/guide
Articles by others on the same topic
Communication that supports understanding and evaluation of scientific claims. Its effects should be assessed through relevant understanding or decisions, rather than the prestige of scientific terminology alone.