A set is countable if it is finite or bijects with a subset of . For any , the Cantor diagonal argument set differs from every at . Hence no such map is surjective. Binary sequences are indicator functions of subsets of , so is uncountable.
Every member of corresponds to a unique permutation of , with . Let be the position of .
For , eventually. Choose after which this holds and then larger than all . The positions would contain all values , a contradiction. Thus is empty, hence countable.
For , eventually. For every sufficiently large , all values occur in positions , so this initial segment is invariant. Comparing consecutive invariant initial segments gives eventually. These are the finite-support permutations, of which there are countably many. Hence is countable.
Let , with . Then exactly when , and the sum becomes
This is when and otherwise. Summing over yields
Taking the complement of the case gives the inclusion-exclusion principle
If are the distinct prime divisors of , inclusion-exclusion removes their multiples from and gives
For the stated squarefree and , Fermat's theorem gives . Since , every divides ; their product does too. Thus is a Carmichael number.
The Hamming distance satisfies the triangle inequality coordinate by coordinate: if , then or . Summing these indicator inequalities proves the claim. A word at distance exactly from is obtained by choosing the coordinates to flip, so
For a -code, radius- balls about codewords are disjoint, giving . Conversely, take a maximal code of minimum distance . Its radius- balls cover , since an uncovered word could otherwise be added, so . Maximizing gives the requested coding bounds.
For , translate a codeword to . Every other word has weight at least three, but any two distinct length-four words of weight at least three have distance at most two. Thus at most one can accompany , while works. Hence .
Bezout identity gives integers with whenever , so . If are inverses, multiplying by an inverse gives . Multiplying Bezout identities for and shows that .
Wilson theorem states that for prime . Pair the nonzero residues with their unique multiplicative inverses. The only self-inverse residues are , whose product is , proving the theorem.
Counting one factor of for every multiple of , another for every multiple of , and so on proves Legendre formula
Now , so . Also , while , so .
Finally,
For , , so the second factor is a -adic unit. If , then
A central force has the form , so it always points along the line from a fixed centre to the particle. Its torque about the centre vanishes:
Thus angular momentum is conserved. Since , the trajectory lies in the fixed plane through the origin perpendicular to .
The area swept in time is , so
which is constant. This proves Kepler's second law.
Suppose in lowest terms. Then . Comparing prime exponents shows that every prime dividing also divides , unless . Hence is an integer. Therefore is either an integer or irrational.
Only must be irrational: if it were rational, subtracting rational would make rational. None of the others must be irrational:
For , let . If is rational, is a counterexample. If is irrational, take and ; then . Thus is the sole expression forced to be irrational.
Fermat's little theorem states that if is prime, then for every integer ; equivalently, when .
If and , then
because is odd. This contradicts Fermat's theorem, so has no solution.
If the primes congruent to were , set . Any prime divisor of is odd and has as a quadratic residue. The preceding result forces , but divides none of the because . This contradiction proves that infinitely many primes are congruent to .
For constant angular velocity, the equation of motion in a rotating frame is
For and , the planar equations combine to
The initial conditions give
Therefore
The maximum speed and, for , its times are
The Lorentz force law is . Before impact the acceleration toward the wall is , so the first-impact speed is .
After the th bounce, the outward speed is , so the outward height is and that excursion contributes twice this distance. Hence
so and .
With quadratic drag, put . Then
whose solution is . Integration gives
Thus , , and .

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.