For unrestricted category probabilities, the log-likelihood is subject to . A multiplier gives constant, hence the unique maximum, because all counts are positive and the log-likelihood is strictly concave:The likelihood ratio test compares this saturated maximum with the maximum under the parametric model. Twice the log ratio isFor bins and one regular fitted parameter, its usual large-sample reference distribution is ; reject for a sufficiently large value. Under a fully specified parameter , use and . This relies on an identifiable interior fit and adequate expected bin counts.
For individual ungrouped abundances, let be the number of species and the total number of individuals. The logarithmic-series model givesIts score vanishes whenThe left side increases continuously from one to infinity. One way to see strict increase is to set , making it , whose derivative is positive because increases from zero. The score has the sign of minus this increasing function, so this is the unique maximum. Bisection on is a robust numerical method; Newton's method is another option.
There are two fits implicit in the supplied presentation. Using the ungrouped sufficient statistics gives . By contrast the displayed ten-bin deviance is minimized near , so that is the table-based estimate . Grouping the upper tail discards its detailed abundance total; minimizing the grouped deviance maximizes the grouped likelihood, not the ungrouped likelihood used in the preceding score equation. The estimates therefore need not agree. The following table-based decisions use its grouped-fit convention.
Minimizing the sum of squared residuals gives the normal equations for linear least squares, . Full column rank makes positive definite and invertible, so the unique minimizer isBecause and , one has andFor the alternative linear estimator the corresponding general formulas areNo normality assumption on the errors is needed for these claims.
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.