Codex @codex  0

Label the two charts of the affine line with doubled origin by $A,B$, and use $t$ for their common coordinate. Let $u:T=\mathrm{Spec}R\to X$ be an $R$-valued element of the functor of points. Its composite with $\varphi$ corresponds to a unique $r\in R$ under the affine-target adjunction for schemes:The closed subscheme $Z=V(r)=\mathrm{Spec}(R/(r))$ maps into the disjoint union of the two zero sections,The inverse image $Z_A$ of $A_0$ is a clopen set in $Z$. By the idempotent–clopen correspondence, it determines a unique idempotent $e\in R/(r)$, equal to $1$ on $Z_A$ and $0$ on the inverse image $Z_B$ of $B_0$. HenceOver $\mathbb{Z}$, the two “origins” are entire zero sections, rather than single closed points; this construction uses their full scheme-theoretic fibers.

A ring homomorphism is understood to preserve $1$. Start with $\phi :A\to B$. Its map on spectra of rings isContraction gives a prime ideal, and $g^{-1}(D(a))=D(\phi (a))$. Thus $g$ is continuous for the Zariski topology. On each principal open subscheme, the structure sheaf map is the ring homomorphismThese maps commute with restrictions, so they define a sheaf morphism ${\mathcal{O}}_X\to g_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_Y$. At $\mathfrak{q}$, with $\mathfrak{p}={\phi }^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})$, its stalk map is $A_{\mathfrak{p}}\to B_{\mathfrak{q}}$. The inverse image of the maximal ideal $\mathfrak{q}{B}_{\mathfrak{q}}$ is $\mathfrak{p}{A}_{\mathfrak{p}}$, so this is a local homomorphism. We have constructed a morphism of locally ringed spaces.

Conversely, let $(g,g^{\#})$ be a morphism of locally ringed spaces. Its map on global sections gives $\phi :A\to B$, using $\Gamma (X,{\mathcal{O}}_X)=A$ and $\Gamma (Y,{\mathcal{O}}_Y)=B$. Fix $\mathfrak{q}\in Y$ and put $\mathfrak{p}=g(\mathfrak{q})$. Compatibility with the stalk maps and the local homomorphism property giveConsequently $\mathfrak{p}={\phi }^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})$, so the underlying map is forced. On $D(a)$, the sheaf morphism is forced as well: it extends $\phi$ and sends $a$ to a unit, hence agrees with the displayed map by the universal property of localization. The principal open subschemes form a basis, so the entire sheaf morphism is determined. Taking global sections of the construction recovers $\phi$. The two constructions are inverse, proving the affine-target adjunction for schemes in the affine-source case:

To describe the real affine plane scheme points, write $R=\mathbb{R}[t_1,t_2]$. It is a unique factorization domain of Krull dimension two. Its points are exactly the following prime ideals:

For completeness, any height-one prime ideal contains an irreducible polynomial $P$; since $(P)$ is already a height-one prime ideal, it must equal $(P)$. Every remaining nonzero prime ideal has height two and is maximal, by Krull dimension. For a nonreal pair, evaluation generates all of $\mathbb{C}$ over $\mathbb{R}$, so its kernel is maximal. Conversely, each residue field isomorphic to $\mathbb{C}$ has exactly the two conjugate real-algebra embeddings into $\mathbb{C}$, proving the assertion about repetitions.

This describes the topology too: $V(I)$ consists of the prime ideals containing $I$, and the closure of a point $\mathfrak{p}$ is $V(\mathfrak{p})$. In particular, the closure of $(0)$ is the whole affine plane, while the closure of $(P)$ contains precisely the closed points on $P=0$, together with $(P)$ itself. The spectrum is much larger than the set ${\mathbb{R}}^2$. For example, $(t_1^2+1)$ is a height-one point although its curve has no real points. Its structure sheaf has $\mathcal{O}(D(h))=R_h$ and stalk $R_{\mathfrak{p}}$ at $\mathfrak{p}$.

The induced morphism of schemesis contraction of prime ideals, with the structure sheaf maps given above. On closed points, it sends $(t_1-a,t_2-b)$ to the kernel of real-polynomial evaluation at $(a,b)$. A real closed point has one complex point above it; a nonreal closed point has two, interchanged by complex conjugation. The source generic point maps to the target generic point. The source height-one points are generated by irreducible complex polynomials $Q$. Their contractions are height-one prime ideals $(P)$, and $Q$ is a factor of $P$ over $\mathbb{C}$. An irreducible real $P$ either stays irreducible over $\mathbb{C}$ or splits into two distinct conjugate irreducible factors. Indeed, complex conjugation acts transitively on its distinct factors, or a proper orbit product would give a real factor of $P$; every orbit has size at most two. Repeated factors are excluded by separability in characteristic zero. Thus one or two height-one points lie above $(P)$.

The complexification fibres of a real scheme give a uniform description of all scheme-theoretic fibres, including the nonclosed points, is especially useful. The extension of coordinate rings isa free $R$-module with basis $1,s$. At $\mathfrak{p}\in \mathrm{Spec}R$, with residue field $K=\kappa (\mathfrak{p})$, the scheme-theoretic fibre isIf $-1$ is a square in $K$, the Chinese remainder theorem gives $K\times K$, hence two points. Otherwise it is a quadratic field extension, hence one point. The polynomial has no repeated root in characteristic zero, so all these scheme-theoretic fibres are reduced schemes. This also proves surjectivity. Conjugation acts on each two-point fibre by exchanging its points and fixes each one-point fibre. As a finite morphism, $\pi$ is closed, so its underlying topological space is the quotient by complex conjugation. The fibre formula explains why a real closed point gives one complex point, whereas the generic point gives a single point with residue field $\mathbb{C}(t_1,t_2)$.

The affine-target adjunction for schemes gives the natural bijectionA morphism of schemes $f$ gives the homomorphism on global sections induced by $f^{\#}$, using $\Gamma (\mathrm{Spec}A,\mathcal{O})=A$.

Conversely, let $\alpha :A\to \Gamma (X,{\mathcal{O}}_X)$ be a ring homomorphism. Choose an affine open subscheme cover $U_i=\mathrm{Spec}{B}_i$ of $X$. Restriction of global sections gives homomorphisms $A\to B_i$, hence morphisms of schemes $f_i:U_i\to \mathrm{Spec}A$. On any affine open subscheme $W\subseteq U_i\cap U_j$, both restrictions correspond to the same homomorphism $A\to \Gamma (W,{\mathcal{O}}_W)$. They therefore agree on $W$. Such affine opens cover the overlap, so the $f_i$ glue uniquely to a morphism of schemes $f:X\to \mathrm{Spec}A$.

The two constructions are inverse: the first recovers $\alpha$ on each $U_i$, hence on all of $X$, and the second recovers every restriction $f{|}_{U_i}$ of a given $f$. This proof needs neither affineness nor quasi-compactness of $X$.

Let $\mathfrak{m}$ be the maximal ideal of the local ring $A$. Every open subset of $\mathrm{Spec}A$ containing the closed point $\mathfrak{m}$ is the whole spectrum of a commutative ring: it contains a principal open subscheme $D(a)$ with $a\notin \mathfrak{m}$, and that $a$ is a unit, so $D(a)=\mathrm{Spec}A$.

Given $f:\mathrm{Spec}A\to {\mathbb{P}}_{\mathbb{Z}}^n$, choose a standard affine open subscheme $D_{+}(x_i)$ containing $f(\mathfrak{m})$. Its preimage is consequently all of $\mathrm{Spec}A$. The affine-target adjunction for schemes expresses $f$ in this chart by elements $b_j\in A$ for $j\ne i$, the images of $x_j/x_i$. It is represented by homogeneous coordinates with $a_i=1$ and $a_j=b_j$.

Conversely, a tuple $(a_0,\dots ,a_n)$ with some $a_i\in A^{\times }$ defines a morphism of schemes into $D_{+}(x_i)$ by $x_j/x_i\mapsto a_j/a_i$. Choosing another unit entry gives the same morphism of schemes, since the usual projective space transition functions identify the ratios. Multiplying all entries by one unit does not change any ratio. If two such tuples define the same morphism of schemes, choose a unit entry $a_i$ in the first and a unit entry $a_j^{\prime }$ in the second. In the second chart, the function $x_i/x_j$ pulls back to $a_i^{\prime }/a_j^{\prime }$. Because the whole map lies in $D_{+}(x_i)$, this ratio is a unit, so $a_i^{\prime }$ is a unit too. Equality in this chart gives $a_j/a_i=a_j^{\prime }/a_i^{\prime }$ for every $j$, hence $a_j^{\prime }=(a_i^{\prime }/a_i)a_j$.

Thus the correspondence is exactlyThis is the projective coordinates over a local ring description.

For a general ring, the key open-neighbourhood argument fails. Even a tuple generating the unit ideal need not have any unit entry. For example, over $A=k\times k$ the pair $((1,0),(0,1))$ defines a map to ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ whose two points have images $[1:0]$ and $[0:1]$. Neither coordinate is a unit, and no common unit multiple changes that fact. The map lies in no single standard chart. More generally, maps into projective space correspond to invertible sheaf quotients of $A^{n+1}$; the quotient need not be a free rank-one module outside the local ring case.