Affine upper envelope 2026-10-06
For a bounded real function on a compact convex set, this envelope is the infimum of its continuous affine majorants. It is finite, concave and upper semicontinuous, and dominates the function. For continuous functions it describes the maximal integral among probability measures with a specified barycenter. Its homogeneity, subadditivity and affine-translation identities give the supporting measure lemma for affine upper envelopes.
Barycenter 2026-10-06
The barycenter of a probability measure on a compact convex set is the point satisfying the displayed affine integral identities. It exists by approximating the measure by finitely supported measures and using compactness of their finite convex combinations. It is unique because continuous affine functions separate points. In a Banach-space setting it agrees with the appropriate vector integral when that integral is defined.
Maximize the integral of a continuous strictly convex function among probability measures with a fixed barycenter. The supporting measure lemma for affine upper envelopes implies that the maximizing measure has zero integral of the nonnegative envelope gap. Strict convexity makes this gap positive at every nonextreme point, so the measure is concentrated on the extreme boundary. Metrizability makes that boundary Borel and supplies the continuous strictly convex function.
Choquet theorem 2026-10-06
Every point of a compact metrizable convex subset of a Hausdorff locally convex space is the barycenter of a Borel probability measure concentrated on its extreme points. The theorem is an existence assertion; uniqueness requires additional hypotheses such as a simplex structure.
Use the standard setting of a compact metrizable convex set in a Hausdorff locally convex real topological vector space, with its metrizable topology. Write for the continuous affine real functions on . The affine upper envelope of a bounded real function is
Constants make this infimum finite, and . An infimum of affine continuous majorants is concave and upper semicontinuous, hence Borel. For continuous it is the upper concave envelope appropriate to barycentric measures; it is not the pointwise maximum of and a selected affine function.
For a fixed probability , define on real . Affine majorants show
Thus is sublinear and for affine . On the span of , the linear functional taking to is dominated by : the negative-scalar condition follows from . For start from the zero subspace. The Hahn-Banach theorem extends it to a linear functional on with and .
If , then , so . Also and , forcing . Positivity gives , and the Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem produces a Borel probability with . Therefore
For affine , testing both and gives : the two measures have the same barycenter. This proves the requested supporting measure lemma for affine upper envelopes.
Choquet's theorem: every has a Borel probability measure concentrated on the extreme points of whose barycenter is ; equivalently,
Concentration is a measure-one assertion, not a claim that the topological support must be a closed subset of .
To prove it, let be the measures satisfying all the displayed affine equalities. It is nonempty because it contains , and it is weakly closed in the compact space , hence compact. Let be strictly convex, as permitted. Choose maximizing . Apply the supporting measure lemma with and . It gives with the same affine integrals, so , and
Thus has integral zero. If is not extreme, write with and distinct . Strict convexity and every affine majorant give
Therefore the nonnegative gap is strictly positive at every nonextreme point. It is Borel, and is Borel by the allowed G-delta set assertion. Its zero integral forces , proving Choquet's theorem by strict convexity. No uniqueness is asserted for the representing measure.
For the real example, give its closed unit ball the weak-star topology , not the norm topology. The Banach-Alaoglu theorem makes it compact, and separability of makes this ball metrizable. Its extreme points are exactly the classes satisfying almost everywhere. Indeed, if on a positive-measure set, adding and subtracting times its indicator decomposes nontrivially inside the ball. Conversely, if almost everywhere and with , pointwise equality at the endpoints of forces almost everywhere. This is the extreme-point criterion for the L-infinity unit ball.
For the hinted case , put and . Then are extreme and
has barycenter . If is null, the two point masses coincide.
For a general real , choose a measurable representative in and set, for ,
Every is extreme. The map into the weak-star compact ball is Borel: for each , the function is measurable by joint measurability and integration; a countable dense family of such tests generates the ball's topology and Borel sigma-algebra. The measure is independent of changes to on a null set. For each ,
The integrand paired with is dominated by , so Fubini's theorem yields
These continuous linear tests define the weak-star barycenter, hence that barycenter is . Together with , this is the required threshold Choquet representation in L-infinity.
If is instead taken over complex scalars, its extreme points satisfy the same unit-modulus condition. Write , with and , choosing where . Replace the threshold family by . Its members have unit modulus and its average is , so the same pushforward and Fubini argument gives a representing measure in the real locally convex interpretation of the complex ball.
The sublinear functional has a linear supporting functional taking the value at a specified continuous , by the Hahn-Banach theorem. It is positive and normalized because has these values on constants. The Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem gives the probability . Testing affine functions and their negatives shows that and have the same barycenter.
For a real function in the unit ball, push uniform measure on forward by the displayed sign-valued functions. In the weak-star topology this is a Borel probability concentrated on the extreme points, and Fubini's theorem shows that its barycenter is . Weak-star compactness and separability of the predual place the example within Choquet theorem.