For a nonhyperelliptic smooth projective curve of geometric genus four, the canonical map is an embedding of degree six. Dimension counts and supply a quadric and a cubic not divisible by it. The quadric is irreducible because the curve is nondegenerate. Degree six and unmixedness of a complete intersection then identify the intersection with the curve as a scheme.
Translate the tangent hyperplane at a smooth point of the theta divisor to the identity of the Jacobian variety. Its annihilator defines the Gauss map. At with , the derivative of the Abelian sum map identifies this annihilator with the unique line . Thus implies . This connects the intrinsic geometry of the theta divisor to the canonical map of the curve.
Work over , and let be a smooth projective curve of genus and gonality three. A trigonal curve has a basepoint-free degree-three pencil, giving a finite morphism of degree three. It is not hyperelliptic, so its canonical map is an embedding. Let , including its scheme multiplicities. The complete pencil has , and Riemann-Roch theorem gives
Thus the quotient of canonical sections evaluated on has dimension two, and spans a line in . This argument includes ramified fibres, rather than treating only three distinct points.
These two-dimensional quotients vary in a globally generated rank-two bundle on . More explicitly, the image of
has constant rank two by the preceding dimension count, so it is a subbundle. The equality of the rank at every fibre justifies the bundle construction. On global sections it contains every canonical section, and therefore . The Birkhoff–Grothendieck theorem gives
Global generation forces nonnegative splitting degrees. Since ,
The natural map from to is a surjection at every point, since the canonical system has no base points. By projectivization by quotients it gives a map over , with . Its composition with the tautological map of is the canonical embedding of , so is itself a closed embedding. Each fibre of the ruling maps to the spanning line of ; their union is the canonical scroll of a trigonal curve, and the ruling restricts to the given .
Put . Tensoring by identifies the abstract ruled surface with . The section coming from the quotient onto the smaller summand has self-intersection and will be denoted by . In this normalized presentation its tautological class is ; restoring the twist gives
This class gives the scroll map. It is an embedding if . When , it contracts ; thus the printed embedding description needs this positivity qualification. For example, in genus three the ruled model is and its image is ; in genus four the type has a quadric-cone image. In both cases the smooth curve and its canonical image are still described by the construction above.
As a divisor on , the curve meets each fibre in degree three, so for an integer . The scroll formula gives
By adjunction formula and ,
Taking degree on uses and gives . Consequently
Writing , this is
A divisor with on is basepoint-free when . Indeed, its pushforward along the ruling splits into
if each degree is nonnegative, sections generate these coefficient functions, and the fibre monomials generate at every point. In particular is basepoint-free when . The Bertini smoothness theorem then makes its general member nonsingular, including the equality case, where the general member avoids .
Conversely, if , then , so every effective member contains . Because the canonical scroll has ,
The residual system is basepoint-free. Its general member does not contain and intersects it in
Thus a general divisor in the original system is with intersecting components and is singular at an intersection point. The fixed component occurs exactly once for a general member, since is not forced to contain it. This proves both directions, with the canonical-scroll hypotheses retained:
This is also the bound on the Maroni invariant. Merely observing a fixed component would not by itself prove singularity; the positive intersection with its residual divisor is essential.
For these linear systems of divisors, take a complex K3 surface and a nef big divisor , so . The exceptional terminology refers to the complete system , rather than to an arbitrary subsystem.
A monogonal linear system on a K3 surface has the form
where is an elliptic pencil on a K3 surface and is its section. Its intersection with an elliptic fibre is one, and its fixed part is . For a concrete existence example, take the smooth Fermat quartic surface and two skew lines on it. Such lines can be written as
with , and . The equations show that they are disjoint, and the four partial derivatives show that the quartic is smooth. The adjunction formula gives , and the hypersurface exact sequence of sheaves , together with the intermediate cohomology vanishing of these twists, gives . Thus it is a K3 surface, and each line has square . If is the hyperplane class, the planes through cut out plus a residual cubic pencil , . This pencil has no base point off . On , its two local residual equations are the two normal derivatives of the quartic equation; they cannot vanish simultaneously because is smooth. Thus it is basepoint-free, with
The degree-one map of to the pencil base makes it a section and forces connected fibres. Bertini smoothness theorem and adjunction formula then make a general fibre a smooth genus-one curve.
Now choose . For every irreducible curve other than , both and the effective curve have nonnegative intersection with it. Also , so is nef, and . On a general elliptic fibre, the restriction of is the degree-one bundle of the section point. Its unique section vanishes at that point. Every global section of therefore vanishes along a dense subset of , hence along itself. Removing this fixed divisor gives exactly . This verifies the monogonal example directly; its general divisor is a section plus fibres.
A hyperelliptic linear system on a K3 surface is a basepoint-free nef big system whose morphism is generically two-to-one. Equivalently its general smooth curve is hyperelliptic. Let be a double cover branched over a smooth sextic, and put . The double-cover construction gives
Thus is a K3 surface. Further,
since the second summand contributes . The map given by is precisely the double cover. A general member is the double cover of a line branched at six points, so Riemann-Hurwitz formula gives genus two. This is the hyperelliptic example.
A trigonal linear system on a K3 surface is a basepoint-free nonhyperelliptic nef big system whose general smooth curve has gonality three. For an example, take the same smooth quartic with a line and the hyperplane system . Its general member is a smooth plane quartic of genus three; adjunction formula identifies its plane embedding with its canonical map, so it is not hyperelliptic. The elliptic pencil has
Its restriction to a general hyperplane curve is a basepoint-free degree-three pencil. The curve is neither rational nor hyperelliptic, so its gonality is exactly three. This verifies the trigonal example.
Thus the three examples exhibit respectively a fixed section with elliptic fibres, a double-plane map, and an embedded quartic with trigonal hyperplane sections. The last example also illustrates why low-genus trigonal sections should not be confused with a blanket numerical criterion for every higher-genus model.
Let be a smooth projective curve over , let be an effective divisor on an algebraic curve of degree , and identify a translate of the Jacobian variety with . The precise derivative theorem is
where is the connecting homomorphism of
The target is under Serre duality. Its dual is restriction of holomorphic differential forms to the length- closed subscheme :
In particular, this includes derivatives of the local coefficients at repeated points, rather than simply evaluating once for each point of the support.
Here is a local proof of all these identifications. Near a point of multiplicity , take a coordinate vanishing at that point. Nearby effective divisors are represented by monic polynomials of degree . A first-order deformation has equation
These coefficients are the elementary symmetric coordinates on the symmetric product of a curve; they give independent tangent directions even at a repeated point. Dividing the variation of the equation by the original equation identifies the tangent direction with the principal part . Doing this at each point gives , a space of dimension .
To see the derivative of the line bundle directly, use the local frame for and the frame outside the small disks. Relative to the frame at , its transition multiplier changes by
First-order changes of line bundle transition functions have the form ; changing frames adds a Čech coboundary. Thus the tangent space to the Picard group is , and the derivative is exactly the Čech cocycle of these principal parts, namely .
This agrees with differentiating the Abel integrals, including the sign. If and , the sum of at the roots of has derivative
For example, expand . The first-order Newton identities give for , and zero for , yielding exactly the residue above. Equivalently the same formula follows by differentiating the contour integral for the sum over roots. Serre duality pairs the principal part class with by the sum of these residues. Locally this pairing is perfect between the principal parts and the jets times . This proves the asserted dual restriction map.
The long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology now gives the kernel and rank without any reduced-support assumption:
By duality,
This is the geometric form of the derivative of the Abelian sum map. For distinct points, the image is spanned by the evaluation vectors of the canonical map; at repeated points, the corresponding osculating directions must also be included. The Riemann-Roch theorem confirms the rank as . When , the Abelian sum map is an immersion at . For and , its image is a hyperplane annihilated by the unique nonzero holomorphic differential form vanishing along , which will be the tangent hyperplane to the theta divisor.
The Torelli theorem concerns a connected smooth projective curve over and its canonical principal polarization of a complex torus. Its conclusion is
The polarization of a complex torus is part of the hypothesis. We will reconstruct the curve intrinsically from the Jacobian variety and the theta divisor, using the Gauss map of a theta divisor, and prove the reconstruction in both the nonhyperelliptic and hyperelliptic curve cases. The needed biduality and ordinary-tangency facts about projective dual varieties are the general projective-duality results permitted here.
First explain why the polarized data determine the theta divisor up to translation. On , take integral one-form classes dual to the symplectic cycle basis. Pullback by the degree-one Abelian sum map identifies them with the corresponding classes on ; the Riemann bilinear relations give
On , the sum map pulls each one-form back to the sum of its pullbacks from the factors. It has generic degree onto : the Abel theorem for divisors and the existence of classes with give a unique effective unordered representative, and ordering gives the factorial. Integrating a wedge of basis one-forms over the product, only terms assigning a matching pair to each factor survive. Dividing by gives integral one when precisely one matching pair is omitted, and zero for all other basis wedges. Hence the Poincaré dual class of is
This is exactly the integral form of the canonical principal polarization of a complex torus constructed by periods.
Its associated line bundle has one-dimensional section space. One can check this without any theta multiplicity assumption: in normalized period coordinates a representative has sections satisfying
Expand the first periodicity in a Fourier series . The second periodicity forces . Positive definiteness of makes this series normally convergent, so the section space has dimension exactly one. Other line bundles giving the same polarization of a complex torus differ by a degree-zero line bundle. The map is an isomorphism from to its dual abelian variety for a principal polarization of a complex torus: on lattices it is the unimodular alternating form. Thus all these line bundles are translates, and so are their unique zero divisors. In particular the given polarized data recover the reduced divisor on an algebraic curve up to translation. Translation does not change tangent hyperplanes after identifying tangent spaces with .
Put and . At a smooth class , the Riemann singularity theorem says . The derivative of the Abelian sum map identifies the translated tangent hyperplane with . Thus the intrinsic Gauss map of a theta divisor is
In particular
We will see that this map is dominant and generically finite. Its function-field extension therefore determines an intrinsic finite cover: normalize in , obtaining . Normalization in a finite extension is finite here. Let be its reduced codimension-one branch locus. Using this finite cover avoids counting omitted points of the rational Gauss map of a theta divisor as ramification. Everything in this construction is determined by the polarized Jacobian variety.
Suppose first that and is nonhyperelliptic. Its canonical map embeds it as a nondegenerate curve . For clarity, this follows directly from the Riemann-Roch theorem: on a positive-genus curve, so has no base point. If a length-two effective divisor had , a nonconstant meromorphic function with poles bounded by would give a map of degree at most two to . Degree one forces genus zero, and degree two is the hyperelliptic curve case. Hence , and the Riemann-Roch theorem gives . The canonical sections therefore separate every pair of points and every tangent direction, proving the embedding.
Let be the open set of hyperplanes transverse to . A hyperplane in cuts out distinct points. These points span the hyperplane: if a second independent canonical section vanished at all of them, its zero divisor would have to equal the same degree- divisor, and the ratio of the two sections would be a constant. Consequently some of the intersection points are independent. For the divisor formed by such a subset, and .
We need to know that every -subset of a general hyperplane section has this property. Here is the monodromy argument, with its essential steps. The incidence space choosing one intersection point is a projective bundle over before restricting to , so it is irreducible. The incidence space choosing two distinct ordered intersection points is likewise a projective bundle over minus its diagonal, with fibre ; it too is irreducible. Restricting to transverse sections preserves irreducibility and hence connectedness of these covers. Thus the monodromy action of a covering space on the intersection points is two-transitive. A general tangent hyperplane has just one contact of order two, by characteristic-zero projective biduality theorem; locally its intersection equation is together with the other simple points. A small loop in exchanges exactly those two points. Two-transitivity conjugates this transposition to every transposition, so the monodromy is the full symmetric group .
It follows that the finite étale cover of choosing a -subset is connected and irreducible. The condition of dependent evaluations is closed on that cover. It is proper because we have exhibited an independent subset; its image under the finite map is therefore a proper closed subset of . Outside that image every subset is independent. By the Abel theorem for divisors, distinct such subsets have distinct Abelian sums: means there is only one effective representative of its class. Thus the subset cover is birational to with its Gauss map of a theta divisor, and
More precisely it is exactly the restriction of over , since this étale cover is normal and has the same function field.
There can consequently be no branch component over . Its complement is the irreducible hypersurface of tangent hyperplanes, the projective dual variety of . Around a general point of , the transposition of two roots acts nontrivially on -subsets: choose a subset containing exactly one of those two roots. Hence the finite cover is ramified there. This proves the exact identity
The quoted biduality theorem now recovers as an embedded curve, and the canonical map identifies with . This proves reconstruction in the nonhyperelliptic case, including special curves rather than only a general curve in moduli.
Now suppose that is a hyperelliptic curve of genus . Let be its degree-two map. The Riemann-Hurwitz formula gives branch points . Choose an affine coordinate with no branch at infinity and write
The forms are holomorphic and independent; their orders at the two points at infinity show there are exactly of them. Thus the canonical map factors as followed by the degree- rational normal curve embedding
Write .
A general hyperplane section of consists of distinct points avoiding the branch points. The corresponding canonical divisor on consists of the pairs . Choosing one lift from each pair gives an effective divisor with : the evaluation matrix of the canonical forms has Vandermonde rank . If instead a degree- sub-divisor contains an entire pair, it has at least two sections, because that pair is a fibre of and moves in a pencil. Every choice not taking exactly one point from each pair contains an entire pair. Therefore the generic smooth theta points over the hyperplane are exactly the independent choices of one lift in each pair, and
The cover of these choices is again the restriction of to the open set of transverse sections of avoiding the : the identification on a dense open follows from the Abel theorem for divisors, and the choice cover is finite étale and normal. Its components would correspond to components of the function field of the irreducible theta divisor, so it is connected.
There are precisely two types of codimension-one branching. If a simple root crosses a branch point , its two lifts exchange, giving nontrivial monodromy on the choices. This yields the hyperplane
If two roots collide away from the , a local transverse parameter gives roots . Trivialize the two sheets of near . Choices selecting different sheets for the two roots are exchanged when the roots exchange; hence this also causes branching. Its locus is , the hypersurface of tangent hyperplanes to . Away from these two loci all roots and all their lifts vary locally without branching, so there are no other branch components. Consequently
For , is irreducible and nonlinear. Indeed, hyperplane sections of the degree- rational normal curve are binary forms of degree , and the repeated-root hypersurface is their irreducible discriminant of degree . Thus intrinsically separates into its single nonlinear component and its linear components. Biduality recovers , while dualizing recovers the point on .
These data recover the double cover uniquely. Identify with and move infinity away from the recovered branch set. Its function field is
Any other quadratic extension with the same simple branch points has a defining rational function whose ratio to this product has even valuation everywhere. On such a rational function is a constant times a square, and every nonzero complex constant is a square. The quadratic extensions are therefore isomorphic; their smooth projective models are isomorphic. This proves the hyperelliptic reconstruction. The branch locus also distinguishes the two cases: the nonhyperelliptic locus has one irreducible branch hypersurface, whereas the hyperelliptic locus has the additional linear components.
Finally handle the small genera. In genus two, the theta divisor is , the image of itself. The Abelian sum map on is injective because a principal divisor with would give a degree-one map to . Its derivative is nonzero since the canonical bundle has no base point, so this compact injective immersion identifies with . In genus one the same argument identifies with its Jacobian variety after choosing an origin. In genus zero the Riemann-Roch theorem supplies a function with one simple pole, giving . These cases complete the proof: the canonically polarized Jacobian determines the curve in every genus.
First use the canonical map to obtain the embedding. Its canonical divisor has degree six and . Over an algebraically closed ground field, every effective degree-two divisor on an algebraic curve satisfies : a second section would give a nonconstant rational function with poles bounded by , hence a map of degree at most two. Degree one would make rational, and degree two would make it hyperelliptic, both excluded here.
The Riemann-Roch theorem now gives
Thus the complete linear system of divisors separates every pair of points and every tangent direction, including the tests . By the length-two criterion for a very ample linear system, it is a very ample linear system. Consequently the canonical map embeds in , with degree of a projective curve six. Its image is a nondegenerate projective variety, since the four canonical sections are linearly independent.
The space of homogeneous quadrics in four variables has dimension ten, while the Riemann-Roch theorem gives
Restriction therefore has a nonzero kernel, giving a quadric containing . This quadric is irreducible: a reducible quadric is a union of two planes, or a double plane, and an integral curve lying in it would lie in a plane, contradicting nondegeneracy.
Similarly, homogeneous cubics form a twenty-dimensional space, whereas
There are at least five independent cubics vanishing on . The multiples of by linear forms give only four dimensions, so choose a cubic vanishing on which is not divisible by .
The polynomials are a regular sequence, hence their intersection is a projective complete intersection of pure dimension one and degree . It contains , which already has degree six. The unmixedness of a complete intersection excludes embedded components. Equal degrees force to be the only irreducible component and force multiplicity one at its generic point. By generic reducedness with no embedded components, this makes reduced, so as schemes. We have proved
This is a canonical genus-four curve as a quadric-cubic intersection. The quadric may be smooth or a cone; the argument does not require it to be smooth. The same construction descends over the ground field when the curve is geometrically nonhyperelliptic, since the restriction maps and canonical embedding are defined there.
The Riemann-Hurwitz formula for a nonconstant degree- morphism
of smooth projective connected curves in characteristic zero is
where is the effective ramification divisor. If and
, the right side is at least , impossible. If , then and the left side is while the right side is nonnegative. Thus every morphism is constant.
Choose and project from to the pencil of lines through it. Bézout's theorem says that a general such line meets in plus further points, so the resolved projection
has degree . Since the genus of a smooth plane curve is
, Riemann--Hurwitz gives
Every branch point receives at least one ramification point, hence
The adjunction formula gives
Since and , linear equivalence
would force , hence . It is therefore impossible for .
For a smooth plane quartic, projection from a point of the curve gives a degree-three map, so its gonality is at most three. Its genus is three and
, so its plane embedding is the canonical map. A genus-three curve with a degree-two map to would be hyperelliptic, and its canonical map would factor through that double cover and map onto a conic rather than embed the curve. Thus no degree-two map exists, and a degree-one map is excluded by the genus. The quartic's gonality is
For a genus-one curve, Riemann--Roch supplies a degree-two map to , while degree one would make it isomorphic to . Its gonality is therefore
Trigonal curve 2026-10-14
A smooth projective curve of gonality three has a basepoint-free pencil of degree three. For a nonhyperelliptic curve, a fibre of this pencil spans a line in its canonical map: Riemann-Roch theorem gives . The union of these lines is a scroll of degree in . Its smooth ruled model may map to a cone in low genus.