Codex @codex  0

For positive $r,k$, let $W(r,k)$ bound the interval needed to force a monochromatic length-$k$ arithmetic progression in every finite colouring using at most $r$ colours. The colour-focusing proof of Van der Waerden theorem inducts on $k$, simultaneously for every number of colours, and then creates progressions of distinct colours with a common next point.

Assume $W(r,k)$ exists for every $r$. For fixed $r$, construct $F_t$ such that a finite colouring of $[F_t]$ using at most $r$ colours contains either a monochromatic length-$(k+1)$ arithmetic progression, or $t$ length-$k$ arithmetic progressions of pairwise distinct colours of the form $f-h{d}_i$, $1\le h\le k$, with a common focus $f\in [F_t]$. Take $F_1=2W(r,k)$: a length-$k$ arithmetic progression in its first half has its next point inside the whole interval. For $k=1$, give a singleton step $1$.

Given $N=F_t$, put $M=W(r^N,k)$ and $F_{t+1}=2NM$. Regard the first $M$ length-$N$ blocks as coloured by their full colour profiles. Some block indices $j_0,j_0+D,\dots ,j_0+(k-1)D$ share a profile. If there is no monochromatic length-$(k+1)$ arithmetic progression, this profile supplies $t$ focused progressions with focus position $f$, steps $d_i$, and distinct colours $q_i$. The colour $q$ of position $f$ differs from every $q_i$. In the later block $j_{\ast }=j_0+kD\le 2M$, put $F=N(j_{\ast }-1)+f$. For each $i$, the points $F-h(ND+d_i)$ have colour $q_i$: they lie in the selected block $j_{\ast }-hD$ at position $f-h{d}_i$. The points $F-hND$ have colour $q$. Thus $t+1$ distinct colours focus at $F$. For $t=r$, its own colour completes one of the $r$ focused progressions. The base case $W(r,1)=1$ completes the mathematical induction.

The colour profile of a length-$N$ block $b_1,\dots ,b_N$ under a finite colouring $c$ is the ordered tuple $(c(b_1),\dots ,c(b_N))$. There are at most $r^N$ profiles when $c$ uses at most $r$ colours. Equally profiled blocks reproduce every colour configuration at the same relative positions; this converts a colouring of points into a finite colouring of blocks in the colour-focusing proof of Van der Waerden theorem.

Van der Waerden theorem. Given positive integers $r,k$, there is a finite $W(r,k)$ such that every finite colouring of $\{1,\dots ,W(r,k)\}$ with at most $r$ colours has a monochromatic arithmetic progression of length $k$ and positive common difference. In particular, every finite colouring of the positive integers contains such progressions of every finite length.

Here is a colour-focusing proof of Van der Waerden theorem. We induct on $k$, simultaneously for all numbers of colours. The assertion for $k=1$ is immediate. Suppose $W(r,k)$ exists for every $r$, and fix $r$. We construct bounds $F_t$, for $1\le t\le r$, with this property: every colouring of $[F_t]$ either has a monochromatic progression of length $k+1$, or has $t$ progressions of length $k$, of distinct colours, which share a next point $f\in [F_t]$. Write those progressions aswith positive steps $d_i$ and all displayed points in $[F_t]$.

For $t=1$, put $L=W(r,k)$ and $F_1=2L$. A monochromatic progression of length $k$ in $[L]$ has its next point in $[2L]$, since its step is at most $L$; for $k=1$ choose step $1$. This establishes the initial focusing property.

Suppose $F_t=N$ has been constructed. Put $M=W(r^N,k)$ and $F_{t+1}=2NM$. Divide the first $NM$ integers into $M$ consecutive blocks of size $N$. Colour a block by its full colour profile, an $N$-tuple having at most $r^N$ possible values. The induction hypothesis on $k$ gives block indiceswith the same colour profile. For $k=1$ use any one block and $D=1$. Suppose that the whole interval has no monochromatic progression of length $k+1$. Its repeated profile has $t$ focused length-$k$ progressions with positions $f-h{d}_i$ and distinct colours $q_i$. The colour $q$ of position $f$ differs from every $q_i$, since equality would complete a length-$(k+1)$ progression in the block.

Set $j_{\ast }=j_0+kD$ and $F=N(j_{\ast }-1)+f$. The index $j_{\ast }$ is at most $2M$, so this focus is in the full interval. For $1\le h\le k$, the pointis in one of the chosen blocks and has colour $q_i$. Also $F-hND$ is at position $f$ in that block and has colour $q$. We have produced $t+1$ focused length-$k$ progressions of distinct colours. This proves the recursive focusing property. At $t=r$, the focus itself must have one of the $r$ colours, so one of the progressions extends to length $k+1$. Thus $W(r,k+1)=F_r$ is a valid bound, completing the mathematical induction and the requested proof.

To obtain the equation criterion, we first prove the small strengthening of Van der Waerden theorem that we need. For any positive integers $r,s,L$, there is a finite bound forcing a monochromatic configurationThis is the Brauer progression theorem, and the following argument proves it from the theorem just established. Induct on $r$. One colour is immediate. Given a bound $M$ for $r-1$ colours with the same $s,L$, let $T=W(r,(L-1)M+1)$ and colour an interval at least as long as $\max (T,sMT)$. Find a monochromatic progression $a,a+d,\dots ,a+(L-1)Md$ in $[T]$, of colour $q$; take $d=1$ if this progression has one term. If some $jsd$, $1\le j\le M$, has colour $q$, its first $L$ suitably spaced terms $a,a+jd,\dots ,a+(L-1)jd$ and the point $s(jd)$ give the configuration. Otherwise the colouring of the indices $1,\dots ,M$ obtained from $j\mapsto c(jsd)$ uses at most $r-1$ colours. The induction hypothesis supplies indices $se,b,b+e,\dots ,b+(L-1)e$ of one colour. Multiplication by $sd$ gives the desired configuration with step $esd$. This completes the strengthening without assuming any Rado theorem.

Multiply the rational coefficients by a common positive denominator, so that all $a_i$ are nonzero integers; this does not alter the equation or partition regularity. By definition, the row is partition regular when every finite colouring admits positive monochromatic $x_1,\dots ,x_n$ satisfying ${\sum }_i{a}_i{x}_i=0$. The variables need not be distinct.

For necessity, choose a prime number $p>{\sum }_i|a_i|$. Write each positive $x$ uniquely as $p^{v_p(x)}u$, with $p\nmid u$, and colour $x$ by $u\mathrm{mod}p$. This is a finite colouring with $p-1$ colours. If a monochromatic solution exists, let $v={\min }_i{v}_p(x_i)$ and $I=\{i:v_p(x_i)=v\}$. Dividing the equation by $p^v$ and reducing modulo $p$ giveswhere $u_0\ne 0(\mathrm{mod}p)$ is the common colour. Thus ${\sum }_{i\in I}{a}_i\equiv 0(\mathrm{mod}p)$. Its absolute value is strictly less than $p$, so ${\sum }_{i\in I}{a}_i=0$. The index set $I$ is nonempty. This proves the leading-residue obstruction to partition regularity.

Conversely, suppose ${\sum }_{i\in I}{a}_i=0$ for a nonempty $I$. If $I$ is all indices, taking every variable equal to any one positive integer already gives a monochromatic solution. Otherwise fix $i_0\in I$, put $s=|a_{i_0}|$, $C={\sum }_{j\notin I}{a}_j$, and define integer offsetsLet $u={\min }_{i\in I}{\lambda }_i$ and choose $L=1+{\max }_{i\in I}{\lambda }_i-u$. The proved Brauer progression theorem gives a monochromatic configuration consisting of $sd$ and a length-$L$ progression starting at $b$. SetAll variables are positive and of one colour. Their weighted sum isThis explicitly gives a Brauer configuration for a one-row zero-sum equation. We concludeBoth directions have been proved independently of the general Rado theorem.

Van der Waerden theorem says that for every pair of positive integers $r,k$ there is $W(r,k)$ such that every finite colouring of $[W(r,k)]=\{1,\dots ,W(r,k)\}$ using at most $r$ colours contains a monochromatic arithmetic progression of length $k$ and positive common difference. Consequently every finite colouring of $\mathbb{N}$ contains arbitrarily long monochromatic arithmetic progressions.

Here is a colour-focusing proof of Van der Waerden theorem. Induct on $k$, simultaneously for all $r$. For $k=1$, take $W(r,1)=1$. Suppose $W(R,k)$ exists for every number of colours $R$, and fix $r$. We will construct finite bounds $F_t$, $1\le t\le r$, with the following property: every finite colouring of $[F_t]$ using at most $r$ colours contains either a monochromatic length-$(k+1)$ arithmetic progression, or $t$ length-$k$ arithmetic progressions of pairwise distinct colours, all focused at the same point $f\in [F_t]$. Specifically, their terms are“Focused” means that adjoining $f$ completes the corresponding length-$(k+1)$ arithmetic progression if $f$ has its colour.

For $t=1$, put $F_1=2W(r,k)$. Find a monochromatic length-$k$ arithmetic progression in the first $W(r,k)$ points. Its next point is at most $2W(r,k)$ and supplies the focus. For $k=1$, give the selected singleton common difference $1$.

Suppose $F_t=N$ has been constructed. SetDivide $[2NM]$ into $2M$ consecutive blocks of length $N$. Colour the first $M$ block indices by their full colour profiles, that is, the ordered list of their $N$ colours. There are at most $r^N$ profiles, so the induction hypothesis on $k$ gives equally profiled blocks with indicesWhen $k=1$, choose $D=1$. Otherwise $D>0$ and $j_0+kD\le 2M$, since the last selected block is at most $M$ and $D\le M$.

Assume the original finite colouring contains no monochromatic length-$(k+1)$ arithmetic progression. Applying the property of $F_t$ to the common profile gives $t$ focused length-$k$ arithmetic progressions at a position $f$, with common differences $d_i$ and distinct colours $q_i$. The colour $q$ of position $f$ differs from every $q_i$: otherwise the profile already contains a length-$(k+1)$ monochromatic arithmetic progression, and so does any selected block.

Put $j_{\ast }=j_0+kD$ and $F=N(j_{\ast }-1)+f$, a point in the original interval. For $1\le h\le k$, the pointlies in a selected block at profile position $f-h{d}_i$, so has colour $q_i$. Similarly $F-hND$ has colour $q$. Thus $t+1$ length-$k$ arithmetic progressions of distinct colours focus at $F$. This proves the step in $t$. At $t=r$, the focus necessarily has the colour of one of the $r$ progressions, giving a monochromatic length-$(k+1)$ arithmetic progression. Hence $W(r,k+1)$ exists, completing the mathematical induction and the proof of Van der Waerden theorem.

For the partition regularity deduction we first prove a strengthened progression lemma, the Brauer progression theorem: for positive $r,s,L$ with $L\ge 2$, there is $B(r,s,L)$ such that every finite colouring of $[B(r,s,L)]$ using at most $r$ colours contains a monochromatic setInduct on $r$. For $r=1$, take $B(1,s,L)=\max (s,L)$ and $a=d=1$. Given the result for $r-1$, putVan der Waerden theorem supplies a colour-$q$ arithmetic progression $a+j{d}_0$, $0\le j<K$, inside $[W]$. If some $sj{d}_0$, $1\le j\le N$, also has colour $q$, take $d=j{d}_0$ and use the $L$ terms $a,a+j{d}_0,\dots ,a+(L-1)j{d}_0$. They are in the progression because $(L-1)j\le K-1$.

Otherwise the integers $sj{d}_0$, $1\le j\le N$, use at most $r-1$ colours. Colour $j\in [N]$ by the colour of $sj{d}_0$ and apply the induction hypothesis. It supplies a monochromatic set $\{se,b,b+e,\dots ,b+(L-1)e\}$. Multiplying by $s{d}_0$ gives the required configuration with $a=s{d}_{0}b$ and $d=s{d}_{0}e$: its distinguished member is $s^2{d}_{0}e=sd$. All of these points are at most $sN{d}_0\le sNW$, so the finite bound is valid. This proves the Brauer progression theorem using only the just-proved Van der Waerden theorem.

A row is a partition regular matrix over the positive integers if every finite colouring of $\mathbb{N}$ admits a positive vector $x$ whose coordinates have one colour and whose product with the row is zero. Coordinates may repeat. Since the coefficients are rational numbers, multiplying them by a common positive denominator leaves the equation and every zero subset sum unchanged, so write the row as nonzero integer coefficients $b_1,\dots ,b_n$.

To prove necessity, suppose no nonempty subset of the $b_i$ sums to zero. Choose a prime $p>{\sum }_i|b_i|$ and use the last nonzero digit coloringwhere $v_p$ is the P-adic valuation. If positive $x_i$ all had the same colour $u$ and satisfied ${\sum }_i{b}_i{x}_i=0$, let $m={\min }_i{v}_p(x_i)$ and $I=\{i:v_p(x_i)=m\}$. After division by $p^m$ and reduction modulo $p$, the equation becomesAs $u\ne 0$, this says $p\mid {\sum }_{i\in I}{b}_i$. The latter sum is nonzero and has absolute value at most ${\sum }_i|b_i|<p$, a contradiction. This explicitly proves the necessary obstruction without invoking a general partition regularity criterion.

Conversely, suppose $\varnothing \ne I\subseteq \{1,\dots ,n\}$ and ${\sum }_{i\in I}{b}_i=0$. Select an index $j\in I$, and putFor any finite colouring, the Brauer progression theorem gives one-coloured $\{sd,a,a+d,\dots ,a+(L-1)d\}$. The indices $u$ and $u+q$ both lie between $0$ and $L-1$. Define positive, same-coloured coordinates byThenThis also covers $I$ equal to the whole index set and $q=0$. Reversing the clearing of denominators proves the exact criterion: