Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2023 iii Paper 160 1 c i Solution 2026-09-28
Conjugation by a permutation merely permutes the transpositions. Their sum is therefore a conjugacy class sum and belongs to the center of an associative algebra . Since the complex Specht module is an irreducible representation, Schur lemma says that acts on it as a scalar, say .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2024 iii Paper 151 1 Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Let be a projective resolution of the trivial -module. The projective-resolution definition of group cohomology isThis is independent, up to a natural isomorphism, of the chosen projective resolution.
The degreewise natural isomorphismscommute with the coboundary maps. Taking cohomology proves that group cohomology commutes with finite direct sums:
Now restrict from to a subgroup . The group ring is free as a -module, so restriction carries free modules to free modules and projective modules to projective modules. Thus the restricted complex is a projective resolution of the trivial -module. For the coinduced module , the Hom functor adjunction for a coinduced module gives an isomorphism of cochain complexesExplicitly, a map is sent to ; the inverse sends a -linear map to . Taking cohomology proves Shapiro's lemma:
For the conjugation module of a group ring , the basis is the disjoint union of its conjugacy classes. Hence is the direct sum of the integral permutation modules on those classes. The class of a representative is the transitive -set , where is its centralizer. Since is finite, this permutation module is both induced and coinduced from the trivial -module . Applying group cohomology commutes with finite direct sums and Shapiro's lemma yields the group cohomology of a conjugation module:
The symmetric group has three conjugacy classes, represented by the identity, a transposition, and a three-cycle. Their centralizers are respectivelyFor any finite group acting trivially on ,because a group homomorphism sends an element of finite order to an element of finite order, while the additive group of the integers contains no nonzero torsion elements. ThereforeThe periodic resolution of a finite cyclic group alternates the maps and . After applying with the trivial action, these become alternately zero and multiplication by , provingCombining this calculation with the supplied gives
A nonabelian simple group has no nonidentity conjugacy class of prime-power size. Coprime-degree irreducible characters vanish on such an element: the conjugacy-class sum makes the character-to-degree ratio an algebraic integer, and the Kronecker theorem on algebraic integers in the unit disk makes a nonzero ratio a root of unity, forcing a scalar in a faithful group representation. Column character orthogonality then makes an algebraic integer, impossible. This is the character-theoretic ingredient in Burnside's theorem.
Prime-to-p conjugacy class lemma 2026-10-06
For a finite group with trivial centre of a group and a prime divisor of its order, some nonidentity conjugacy class has size coprime to . Otherwise the class equation would give . Primality is essential: in the symmetric group , neither nonidentity class size is coprime to the composite divisor .
Shortest conjugacy representative Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
A shortest conjugacy representative is a word having the fewest written letters among all words representing elements of a fixed conjugacy class. This minimum equals the least group word length of an element in the class; a longer spelling of that element is not itself a shortest representative. Such a word exists because lengths are nonnegative integers. It is freely and cyclically reduced: free cancellation shortens the same representative, while removing mutually inverse first and last letters shortens a conjugate. Every cyclic rotation has the same minimal length.
Specht modules as minimal left ideals 2026-10-07
In the complex symmetric-group algebra, normalize a Young symmetrizer by . The row-column collision lemma proves , so is a primitive idempotent and is an irreducible left module. Different shapes are separated by the vanishing corner for . Counting conjugacy classes then proves that these modules exhaust the simple modules.
Sunada theorem 2026-10-06
Suppose a finite group acts by Riemannian isometries on a compact Riemannian manifold , and Gassmann equivalent subgroups act freely. The quotient manifolds have equal Laplace-Beltrami operator spectra. For an eigenfunction space , the quotient multiplicity is , and the equality follows by summing its character of a representation over conjugacy classes. Nonconjugacy inside alone does not guarantee that the quotients are nonisometric.
In a finite Dehn presentation, every nonidentity finite-order element has a shortest conjugacy representative of length at most half the length of some relator. Indeed a positive power contains a Dehn segment. If the representative had length at least , the first letters of that segment would fit into a cyclic rotation and could be replaced by fewer letters, contradicting minimality. Bounded relator lengths and a finite alphabet therefore give finitely many conjugacy classes of finite-order elements. With no relators the group is free and torsion-free, so only the identity class remains.
If an infinite group has a single nonidentity conjugacy class, it is a torsion-free group. Otherwise every nonidentity element has the same finite order . Powers show is prime. For , choose ; then gives , impossible by Fermat's little theorem. For , the group has exponent two and is abelian, so every conjugacy class is a singleton and the hypothesis would force the group to have only two elements. Infinitude excludes this final case.
For a finite field of odd characteristic and nonzero , let . An arbitrary determinant-one matrix satisfies only if and . The determinant condition then gives . Conversely . Thus nonzero upper unipotent matrices fall into two conjugacy classes under this square-class criterion. For example, and are conjugate over because , but not over . The criterion compares these particular upper unipotent representatives; it does not classify all determinant-one matrices.