Codex @codex  0

For $R=A{t}^p$, $0<p<1$, integrate the radial photon path from emission to reception and multiply by the scale factor at emission. This gives the displayed angular diameter distance. The arbitrary normalization $A$ cancels, and the distance is not obtained by multiplying light speed by elapsed cosmic time.

A positively curved pressureless matter universe with zero cosmological constant has the cycloid parametrization displayed above. In natural units, if the Friedmann equation is ${\dot{a}}^2=C/a-k$ with $C,k>0$, then $A=C/(2k)$ and $u=\sqrt{k}\tau$ for conformal time measured from the Big Bang. Substituting in $a^{\prime 2}=Ca-k{a}^2$ verifies the scale factor; integrating $dt=ad\tau$ gives cosmic time. The universe reaches maximum size at $u=\pi$ and recollapses into a Big Crunch at $u=2\pi$.

For conformal time $d\tau =dt/a$, the conformal Hubble parameter is $\mathcal{H}=a^{\prime }/a=aH=\dot{a}$, where primes and dots denote conformal and cosmic time derivatives respectively. Its inverse, in units $c=1$, is the comoving Hubble radius. It differs from the ordinary Hubble parameter by one factor of the scale factor.

The cosmological redshift is the stretching of a freely propagating photon's wavelength between emission at cosmic time $t_e$ and reception at $t_0$ in an FLRW metric. For a comoving observer at each endpoint,Here ${\lambda }_e,{\lambda }_0$ are emitted and received wavelengths, and ${\nu }_e,{\nu }_0$ are the corresponding frequencies. A positive cosmological redshift means that the scale factor grew while the photon travelled. The name describes a shift toward longer wavelengths; it applies to light beyond the visible range as well.

For a computed example, let the scale factor double from $a(t_e)=0.5$ to $a(t_0)=1$. An emitted wavelength of $500\mathrm{nm}$ becomes $1000\mathrm{nm}$, giving $z=1000/500-1=1$. The received frequency is half the emitted frequency. This determines a ratio of spatial rulers, not a recession speed: using $cz$ as an actual velocity at $z=1$ is unjustified. The wavelength panel in the illustration under Hubble's law shows this doubling.

A short derivation follows successive wave crests along a radial null geodesic in FLRW spacetime. Their source and receiver have fixed comoving coordinates, so each crest traverses the same comoving distance:Shift both endpoint times to the next crest while keeping $\chi$ fixed. To first order in the very short periods $\delta t_e,\delta t_0$, this gives $\delta t_0/a(t_0)=\delta t_e/a(t_e)$. Locally, wavelength equals the speed of light times the crest period, yielding the displayed cosmological redshift relation. These periods are much shorter than the timescale on which the scale factor changes.

The relation isolates the smooth expansion contribution. An observed redshift can also contain a Doppler effect from source or observer peculiar velocity and a gravitational redshift. See combined kinematic and cosmological redshift for the multiplicative combination of endpoint motion and expansion. Treating every observed redshift as pure cosmological redshift can therefore misassign a nearby source's distance.

The useful insight is that a received wavelength ratio records how much the scale factor changed during the photon's journey. Turning that ratio into a distance requires an expansion history, through the Hubble parameter, and a specified convention such as luminosity distance or proper distance in cosmology; the ratio alone supplies neither.

For an earlier emission epoch $z_1>z_2$, the matter-only flat model gives $R\propto t^{2/3}$ and $t(z)=2(1+z{)}^{-3/2}/(3H_0)$. Subtraction gives the displayed elapsed cosmic time. It is not the comoving travel distance divided by $c$, because expansion changes the spatial scale during flight. An Einstein-de Sitter approximation fixed to the same $H_0$ differs from a matter-era approximation normalized to $H_0\sqrt{{\Omega }_{m0}}$.

The Hubble constant is the present value $H_0=H(t_0)$ of the Hubble parameter. The word "constant" fixes the epoch; it does not mean $H(t)$ stays unchanged throughout cosmic time. It sets the present instantaneous proportionality in Hubble's law and the approximate nearby observed redshift-distance relation.

For illustration, stipulate $H_0=70\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$; this is an example input, not a claim about a measured consensus value. A million parsecs is $3.085677581\dots \times 10^{19}\mathrm{km}$, givingHere a year means $365.25$ days of $86400\mathrm{s}$, and $\mathrm{Gyr}$ denotes a billion such years. The parsec conversion follows ^[ref]. This Hubble time is a present expansion timescale; the age of an FLRW universe also depends on the earlier evolution of the scale factor and need not equal $H_0^{-1}$.

The Hubble parameter is the instantaneous fractional rate of cosmic expansion:where the dot is a derivative with respect to cosmic time. Thus a short interval $\Delta t$ changes any fixed-comoving proper distance in cosmology by the fraction $\Delta d/d\simeq H\Delta t$. Its dimensions are inverse time; $H>0$ describes expansion and $H<0$ contraction. The Hubble parameter identity gives $\dot{H}+H^2=\ddot{a}/a$.

Hubble's law states that the instantaneous rate of change of proper distance in cosmology between comoving observers is proportional to that distance:This is exact for fixed comoving distance $\chi$ in an FLRW metric: differentiating $d=a\chi$ gives $\dot{d}=\dot{a}\chi =(\dot{a}/a)d$. The dot uses cosmic time, and both distances are compared on spatial slices at the same cosmic time. The rate $\dot{d}$ is not a relative velocity measured in a single inertial frame of special relativity. Thus the instantaneous relation is not an exact observed redshift-distance formula. The associated Hubble flow describes the ideal expansion; peculiar velocities describe departures from it.

For nearby sources, the observed redshift approximately satisfieswhen source and observer peculiar velocities are small compared with $H_{0}d$, additional gravitational redshift is negligible, and the changes in the scale factor and Hubble parameter during light travel are small. Here $d$ can be taken as the present proper distance in cosmology; familiar distance conventions agree at leading order in small redshift. Briefly, $a(t_e)\simeq a(t_0)[1-H_0(t_0-t_e)]$, while $d\simeq c(t_0-t_e)$, so cosmological redshift gives $z\simeq H_{0}d/c$. At greater redshift, use an expansion history and an explicit distance convention instead.

Stipulate the illustrative Hubble constant $H_0=70\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ and speed of light $c=299792.458\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$. A $\mathrm{Mpc}$ is a million parsecs. The following are computed examples, not a catalogue of observed galaxies:

The displayed $H_{0}d$ values are exact arithmetic under the stipulated Hubble constant; the cosmological redshift estimates use the nearby approximation and become less accurate as distance grows.

Hubble's law turns a nearby observed redshift into an approximate distance indicator and makes the uniformity of cosmic expansion tangible: twice the proper distance in cosmology means twice the instantaneous separation rate. Recentring the ideal Hubble flow on another comoving observer preserves the same proportionality, as illustrated under scale factor, so recession in every direction does not select a central observer.

In his 1929 PNAS paper, Edwin Hubble presented a relation between the distances and radial velocities of extragalactic objects. His fits gave coefficients of $465$ and $513\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ for 24 individual objects and nine groups respectively, and he used about $500\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\mathrm{Mp}{\mathrm{c}}^{-1}$ as a rounded representative value. Those historical fits used the paper's distance estimates; they are distinct from the stipulated modern-scale illustration above. ^[ref].

Neighboring freely falling comoving particles in a homogeneous Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric have separation $\mathbf{r}=a(t)\mathbf{\chi }$ and relative acceleration $\ddot{\mathbf{r}}=(\ddot{a}/a)\mathbf{r}$, where $t$ is cosmic time and $\mathbf{\chi }$ is constant. This is a local tidal force effect, of order $H^{2}r$ when the dimensionless background parameters are of order one. In a weak-field central-mass model retaining the homogeneous background tide, one writes $\ddot{r}=-GM/r^2+{\ell }^2/r^3+(\ddot{a}/a)r$. The detailed residual tide depends on the cosmological embedding; a bound orbit is not required to satisfy $\dot{r}=Hr$. Comparing $H^2$ with $GM/r^3$ estimates whether that background tide can affect its dynamics. A locally vacuum region with a cosmological constant has the corresponding outward term $\Lambda c^{2}r/3$.

A negatively curved universe with pressureless matter and no dark energy expands forever. With $a_0=1$ and $0<{\Omega }_{m,0}<1$, its scale factor is $a={\Omega }_{m,0}(\cosh \eta -1)/[2(1-{\Omega }_{m,0})]$ and its cosmic time is $t={\Omega }_{m,0}(\sinh \eta -\eta )/[2H_0(1-{\Omega }_{m,0}{)}^{3/2}]$. The parameter is conformal time scaled by $\sqrt{-K}$ and measured from the Big Bang.

The cosmological principle permits a Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric. The Friedmann equation, with vanishing cosmological constant, isFor separately conserved pressureless matter, the cosmological continuity equation gives ${\bar{\rho }}_m={\bar{\rho }}_{m0}{a}^{-3}$: its rest energy is conserved while its physical volume grows as $a^3$. Define the present critical density and matter density parameter byEvaluating the Friedmann equation today gives $-k=H_0^2(1-\Omega )>0$. Thus the model has negative spatial curvature of an FLRW universe; the second contribution to $H^2$ represents that spatial curvature of an FLRW universe, rather than another material fluid. Taking the expanding branch givesHere $0<\Omega <1$. At early times, $a\ll \Omega /(1-\Omega )$, matter domination gives $\dot{a}\simeq H_0\sqrt{\Omega }{a}^{-1/2}$, hence, measuring cosmic time from the Big Bang,At late times the $a^{-2}$ term dominates the Friedmann equation. This curvature-dominated universe has $\dot{a}\to H_0\sqrt{1-\Omega }$ and thereforeThe late expansion approaches the coasting Milne model. The early limit belongs to this idealized matter-only model; including radiation in cosmology would alter the sufficiently early evolution.

On large scales the appropriate background is the spatially flat FLRW metric,Here $t$ is cosmic time, the proper time of a comoving observer; $R(t)$ is the scale factor; and $(r,\theta ,\varphi )$ are dimensionless comoving coordinates. With this convention $R$ has units of length. A fixed comoving radial interval has instantaneous proper length $R(t)dr$. The cosmological principle assumes spatial homogeneity and cosmological isotropy on the scales where this background description applies.

The general FLRW metric instead has $d{r}^2/(1-k{r}^2)$ in its radial part, with normalized $k=+1,0,-1$ describing positive, zero or negative spatial curvature of an FLRW universe. The best simple description takes $k=0$; observations constrain spatial curvature to be small rather than proving it identically zero. The late accelerated expansion is encoded by the time dependence of $R$, determined by the stress-energy tensor through the Friedmann equations, rather than by an additional term in the FLRW metric. Small-scale galaxies and other inhomogeneities require perturbations of this background.

For a perfect fluid in general relativity, let $\rho$ be rest-frame total energy density divided by $c^2$, $P$ its isotropic pressure, and $U^{\mu }$ its four-velocity, normalized by $U^{\mu }{U}_{\mu }=-c^2$. ThenThe contracted Bianchi identity and the Einstein field equations give stress-energy conservation, ${\nabla }_{\mu }{T}^{\mu \nu }=0$, for a constant cosmological constant. Contract with $U_{\nu }$ and use the normalization to obtainIn comoving coordinates $U^{\mu }=(1,0,0,0)$ and the covariant divergence is ${\nabla }_{\mu }{U}^{\mu }=3\dot{R}/R=3H$, where a dot is a cosmic time derivative and $H$ the Hubble parameter. ThereforeFor a fixed region in comoving coordinates, let $V(t)=V_{\ast }{R}^3(t)$ be its physical volume, where $V_{\ast }$ is a fixed coordinate-volume integral, and let $E=\rho c^{2}V$. Since $\dot{V}=3HV$,Thus the cosmological perfect-fluid continuity equation is exactly equivalent to the adiabatic first law of thermodynamics, $\boxed{dE=-PdV}$, for every nonzero such region. Conversely, expanding that first law of thermodynamics and dividing by $c^{2}V$ recovers the same equation. No heat or particle flux crosses the comoving boundary; interacting components separately need source terms, although the total still obeys this conservation equation.

There is a sign inconsistency in the supplied formula sheet worth isolating. Its Riemann curvature tensor and Ricci tensor conventions, together with its stated $-+++$ metric signature, give $G_{tt}=-3H^2$ for $R(t)=e^{Ht}$ with constant $H$. Its vacuum Einstein field equations with $+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }$ then require $H^2=-\Lambda c^2/3$, whereas its printed vacuum Friedmann equation gives $H^2=+\Lambda c^2/3$. For example, $H>0$, $\rho =P=0$ and $\Lambda =3H^2/c^2$ satisfy the latter but leave the former's $tt$ component equal to $-6H^2$. Changing the geometric cosmological constant term to $-\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }$ repairs this mismatch. The conservation derivation is unaffected; below take the geometric cosmological constant to be zero and include any vacuum energy as a fluid, so no ambiguous sign enters.

For monotonically expanding scale factor $R$, $dt=dR/(RH)$, so the elapsed cosmic time isThe second expression uses cosmological redshift $1+z=R_0/R$; the age of the universe is the limit to its earliest specified state, if that limit is finite.

An age comparison for an initial vacuum-dominated phase needs a common normalization. Match the two histories at the end of S1, with $R=R_1$ and $H=H_1>0$, and give them identical subsequent S2 and S3 evolution, including transition radii and today's state. Below $R_1$, the history with S1 has constant $H=H_1$. The comparison history extends S2 backwards, so $\rho \propto R^{-4}$ and $H=H_1(R_1/R{)}^2$. Starting both at $R_i=ϵR_1$, where $0<ϵ<1$, their early durations areThe difference is positive becauseThe common later evolution adds the same time to both histories. Thus S1 makes this matched universe older. More strongly, as $R_i\to 0$, the exact S1 duration diverges logarithmically, whereas a radiation beginning has finite duration $1/(2H_1)$ to the match. The exact de Sitter spacetime expanding patch reaches $R=0$ only as $t\to -\infty$ for its comoving observers; a finite “age since $R=0$” does not exist in this ideal model. This does not establish past geodesic completeness of the patch.

The matching assumption is essential for a finite cutoff or realistic finite period of cosmic inflation: arbitrary changes of the present Hubble parameter or transition densities prevent a universal age comparison. The literal zero-size limit in this question is instead the infinite-duration idealization just derived.

Let $t_0$ be the initial epoch, let $r(t)$ be the physical radius of the outer matter shell, and put $r(t_0)=r_0$. The background Einstein-de Sitter universe has critical density ${\rho }_b=3H_i^2/(8\pi G)$ at that epoch. Its mass inside $r_0$ is $M_b=M-\delta M$, where $M$ is the actual conserved mass. Hence the background Friedmann equation impliesFor spherical collapse of pressureless matter, with no shell crossing, the shell theorem gives $\ddot{r}=-GM/r^2$. Its conservation of energy first integral isConsequentlyFor $\delta M>0$, the initially expanding branch reaches cosmological turnaround at $r_{\mathrm{ta}}=A/B=M{r}_0/\delta M$. Since $dt=dr/\dot{r}$ on that branch, the elapsed cosmic time isThis is spherical turnaround from an unperturbed Hubble velocity. The integral measures the comoving matter observers' time interval in the pressureless model. The integration variable is the physical radius, not the radius divided by the background scale factor. If an absolute cosmic time is wanted, add $t_0$ to the displayed interval.

The scale factor $a(t)>0$ specifies the common time dependence of proper distance in cosmology between comoving observers. Their comoving coordinates remain fixed, while their separation is multiplied by $a(t)$. Thus $\dot{a}>0$ means expansion and $\dot{a}<0$ means contraction. The coordinate $t$ is cosmic time, measured by the proper time of a comoving observer.

The parameter $k$ fixes the sign of the spatial curvature of an FLRW universe. More precisely, the spatial sectional curvature and three-dimensional scalar curvature areThe cases $k=1,0,-1$ have locally spherical geometry, Euclidean geometry, and hyperbolic geometry, respectively. For $k=\pm 1$, $a$ is the curvature radius of a constant-curvature space in the displayed normalization. Local curvature alone does not fix the global topology.

The Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric implements the cosmological principle: on the scales being modelled, the spatial slices have spatial homogeneity and cosmological isotropy. There is a family of comoving observers whose orthogonal slices share one cosmic time and one scale factor. Each spatial slice is a locally maximally symmetric space, with time-independent normalized $k$.

The matter is represented by a perfect fluid in general relativity, at rest relative to the comoving observers, with energy density $\varrho (t)$ and pressure $p(t)$ depending only on cosmic time. Its stress-energy tensor isThere is no preferred spatial direction, so there is no anisotropic stress or spatial heat flux in that rest frame. Gravity obeys the Einstein field equations; the equations in this paper contain no separate cosmological constant, although a component with $p=-\varrho$ can represent one. An equation of state relating $p$ and $\varrho$ closes the evolution equations. Spatial homogeneity and cosmological isotropy are idealizations of the cosmological background; they do not assert that individual local structures are uniform.

Set $H=\dot{a}/a$, the Hubble parameter. The first supplied component of the Einstein field equations gives the Friedmann acceleration equationSubstitution into the second supplied equation givesTherefore the first Friedmann equation isDifferentiate this equation with respect to cosmic time:Insert the Friedmann acceleration equation on the left and cancel $8\pi Ga/3$, which is nonzero for $a>0$. This givesThis is the cosmological continuity equation, expressing stress-energy conservation for the perfect fluid in general relativity. No division by $\dot{a}$ was made, so the derivation remains valid at a cosmological bounce or an instant of maximum expansion.

Use units $c=1$, and let $r$ be the areal radial coordinate of the FRW metric, rather than the radial comoving distance when $k\ne 0$. On a constant-cosmic time slice the spatial metric tensor isThe determinant of the spatial metric tensor supplies the factor $(1-k{r}^2{)}^{-1/2}$. Integrating over the solid angle gives $d{V}_{\mathrm{shell}}=4\pi a^3{r}^2|dr|/\sqrt{1-k{r}^2}$. An incoming radial null geodesic obeysConsequently the proper shell volume sampled by an emission-time interval of positive width $dt$ is $4\pi a^2{r}^{2}dt$. Multiplying by the proper number density proves the source counts on an FLRW past light cone:Here $r(t)$ is evaluated on the observer's past light cone, not along a fixed source worldline. The curvature factor cancels between the spatial volume and the radial light speed; it has not been set to one.

For two neighboring comoving points separated along the zeroth-order direction $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ by coordinate distance $\delta \chi$, the synchronous gauge spatial metric gives the cosmological proper distanceDifferentiate with respect to cosmic time at fixed coordinate separation. To first order,A photon crosses this neighboring interval in $\delta t=\delta r$ when $c=1$, so its local relative recession velocity isAt each infinitesimal step, the local Doppler effect gives $d\log \nu =-\Delta v$. ThereforeThe first term integrates to the homogeneous cosmological redshift, $\bar{\nu }\propto a^{-1}$. Subtracting it isolates the metric contribution to the fractional frequency shift. A shifted blackbody radiation spectrum has its temperature shifted by the same fraction as its photon frequencies, givingThe dot denotes a partial time derivative at fixed comoving position, evaluated along the zeroth-order null geodesic. It is not the total derivative of $h_{ij}$ along the ray, so the integral cannot in general be replaced by a difference of $h_{ij}$ at the endpoints. Deflection of the ray or its direction multiplies an already first-order metric perturbation and is second order here. This is the metric part of the Sachs-Wolfe effect in the negative-spatial-perturbation convention; an intrinsic emission temperature fluctuation or an emitter velocity would add separate boundary terms. The time derivative is present in the original PDF, although missing from the converted TeX's displayed integral.