Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 32 5 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For a proper continuous event time, the survival function is . The assumed invertibility of the cumulative hazard function gives, for ,ThereforeThis is the cumulative hazard probability transformation; it applies also conditionally on a subject's covariates, using that subject's correctly specified cumulative hazard function.
The fitted transformed times are Cox–Snell residuals. They retain their event/right censoring indicators, so a right-censored residual represents an exponential observation known only to exceed its displayed value. Under the fitted model and independent right censoring, calculate the Kaplan–Meier estimator of residual survival and compare it with , or calculate the residual Nelson–Aalen estimator and compare its cumulative hazard with the diagonal . Systematic departures reveal model inadequacy; sparse extreme residual risk sets and parameter estimation require caution. Treating all censored residuals as observed event times would invalidate this diagnostic.
Without right censoring, the residual mean should be approximately one. With right censoring, use the modified Cox–Snell residualFor a true unit-rate exponential distribution, the memoryless property gives . Thus an event keeps its known transformed time, while a censored observation is replaced by the conditional expected event time. Under independent right censoring, iterated expectation makes the mean of these adjusted values one when the true hazards are used, and approximately one when fitted hazards are used. These mean-imputed values do not themselves have an exponential distribution, so the survival-curve diagnostic should still use the original censored residual dataset. Moreover fitting equations can force the adjusted sample mean to one, making its mean alone a weak diagnostic.
For the proposed mixture of a finite right censoring time and no right censoring, andConsequentlyWhen right censoring has positive probability this choice is unique; if , no correction is needed and any has the same effect. Its independence from is the content of exponential memorylessness: the expected extra lifetime after any right censoring time is one. Conditioning on an arbitrary independent right censoring time proves the same correction beyond this special two-point mixture.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 33 5 a iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Continuity of the cumulative distribution function gives the probability integral transform: is uniform on . Hence is also uniform, and the cumulative hazard probability transformation givesThusThe exponential distribution has rate and mean one here. This proof does not require a strictly increasing cumulative hazard: intervals with zero density carry no probability mass. It assumes a proper continuous finite survival time, without an atom at infinity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 207 5 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For a continuous proper event time with cumulative hazard function and survivor function , use the assumed inverse of . For ,Therefore the integrated-hazard transformation is unit exponential:This cumulative hazard probability transformation is the basis for the following survival-model residual diagnostics.