The current-transformer burden is the load impedance connected to a current transformer's secondary, including the instrument and secondary connection leads. It determines the electric potential difference needed to drive the secondary electric current. Changing it can change both current-transformer ratio error and current-transformer phase displacement. ABB's application guide explicitly connects these errors to the secondary burden and distinguishes standard burdens from actual connected devices.[ref]
For sinusoidal RMS secondary current and external burden , the secondary terminal relations are
Here is complex electrical power; its real part is dissipated active power. A volt-ampere burden magnitude alone does not determine its power factor or its complex complex impedance.
For an original resistive example, an instrument contributes and the complete outgoing-plus-return leads contribute . At RMS, total burden is , terminal magnitude is , and burden apparent power is . The instrument dissipates and the leads dissipate . Ignoring the leads would understate the required terminal magnitude by a factor of three. A stipulated rating of 5 VA at 5 A corresponds to only magnitude, so this setup would not satisfy that stated burden limit.
Equal VA values also need not mean equal complex loading. At 5 A, and both have 5 VA magnitude. The second instead absorbs and , with power factor0.6. The resulting phase and ratio effects depend on the transformer's own response.
The secondary winding's internal impedance is not part of the external burden, but both enter the induced-voltage and excitation calculation. NIST's equivalent circuit separates these terms explicitly.[ref] A proposed calibration comparison records the complete connected impedance at the relevant frequency, including leads, and repeats ratio and phase measurements at selected burdens. It does not infer unchanged accuracy merely because the nominal turns remain the same.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.