Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 211 6 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Differentiate the backward equation for with respect to the stock state, and put . The product derivative of is , givingThe assumed smoothness and bounded derivatives put in the uniqueness class for the equation defining . Therefore , and is the option delta. Substituting in the Itô integral from part (a) and using gives the self-financing representationThe boundedness hypotheses justify both stochastic integrals. This derivation does not divide by and remains valid even at states with zero diffusion amplitude.
There need not be a weak solution of a stochastic differential equation , , even when is a bounded Borel measurable function strictly positive everywhere. For the displayed example, any solution would be a continuous local martingale with , hence a square-integrable martingale. The occupation-times formula applied to gives . Since away from zero, . The Gronwall inequality makes , a contradiction. Thus a diffusion amplitude positive at a single problematic point cannot repair arbitrarily slow neighbouring motion. A local positive lower bound, as in the Brownian time change for a variable diffusion speed, rules out this example.