Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 iii Paper 80 2 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Set and . The incident field relevant to each sphere is its exciting field of a conductivity inclusion: the macroscopic field plus the regular field due to other inclusions and periodic images, excluding its own singular dipole. In the first interaction approximation writeThe interior response from part (i) then gives the improved polarizationAveraging, using , givesTherefore the dipole interaction correction to effective conductivity isThe factors cancel against the denominator in the given field correction. Linearity permits repeating the calculation for three independent incident gradients, recovering the tensor rather than just its action on . This is a second-reflection estimate; further dipole reflections and higher multipoles have been omitted.
A literal pointwise reading of the field printed “on the surface” needs qualification. Even the isolated-sphere solution in part (i) has, on a concentric sphere of radius ,For , its values at and are respectively and , where . They differ whenever there is nonzero contrast. Thus a single constant matrix cannot give the total pointwise field everywhere on that sphere.
The consistent local-field interpretation is a spherical average, or equivalently the regular exciting field at the centre. Indeed , so the angular mean of the self-dipole is zero. The other-inclusion field is harmonic inside the surrounding sphere, and the mean value property gives its central value. With encoding this average regular correction, the calculation above is justified. If “on the surface” is instead insisted upon as a constant total pointwise field, that premise is false and the isolated-sphere values above are a counterexample. The distinction between dipole fields and local exciting fields is also treated in sections 10.2–10.3 of www.math.utah.edu/~milton/TheoryCompositesNOPRINT.pdf .