Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 74 5 Solution 2026-10-14
For and , define the inverse different, or codifferent, by the trace-dual latticeThe trace pairing is nondegenerate in this separable field extension, so this is a full fractional ideal of . The relative different ideal is its inverse:Every integral has integral traces against , so and .
For , take an integral basis and its trace pairing matrix . In these coordinates the codifferent is , andThe ideal norm of equals this index, by inversion of fractional ideal norms. Therefore the norm of the different ideal relation isHere is the number of conjugate pairs of complex embeddings. The different is an ideal of the upper field, whereas the relative discriminant ideal is its ideal norm in the base field; over the ordinary signed field discriminant also records the signature.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 74 6 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
For a number field , its ordinary Hilbert class field is the maximal finite abelian extension unramified at every finite prime and with every real place splitting completely. The Artin reciprocity map inducesThe image of an unramified prime ideal is its Frobenius automorphism. Thus a prime splits completely in precisely when its ideal class is trivial. This field packages ideal-class obstructions into splitting behavior. Ideals become principal in by the principal ideal theorem. Specifying the real-place convention matters for real fields: omitting it leads instead to the narrow class-field problem. Both illustrative fields below are imaginary quadratic, so there are no real places to discuss.
First consider , whose quadratic discriminant is . The correspondence between ideal classes and reduced primitive positive definite binary quadratic forms lets us compute its class number without guessing a class field. A reduced form obeys , , and ; a boundary case uses . For the only class is ; for the two possibilities are and . Hence and its ideal class group is cyclic of order three.
Take . Its only possible rational roots are , neither a root, so it is irreducible. Its polynomial discriminant is , which is nonsquare. Thus its splitting field has Galois group and the quadratic fixed field of is , generated by the square root of its discriminant. Therefore is cyclic of degree three and for a root of .
At a prime other than , the separable residue polynomial splits over a finite residue-field extension; Hensel's lemma puts all its roots in an unramified local extension. At there is the exact factorizationThe simple factor lifts by Hensel's lemma. The remaining quadratic factor has discriminant valuation one, because the cubic discriminant is and the resultant with the simple factor is a unit. Its local splitting field is ramified quadratic, with inertia group of order two. Its intersection with is trivial, so the relative extension is unramified at as well. There are no real places. An unramified abelian extension of degree must be all of , givingThis is the Hilbert class field of Q of square root minus twenty-three.
The other alternative, , has quadratic discriminant . Reduced forms have and even . Testing , , and gives exactlyThus . Each class is its own inverse, because replacing by leaves these representatives unchanged; consequently the ideal class group is .
Set . The square classes are independent, so . Their product gives , and is abelian of degree four. Its seven quadratic subfields have discriminantsFor a multiquadratic abelian extension, the conductor-discriminant formula takes the product of these quadratic character conductors, namely the absolute quadratic discriminants. Hence . The relative discriminant tower formula givesThe integral relative discriminant ideal therefore has norm one and is the unit ideal. Thus is everywhere unramified, and its degree equals the class number. This proves the other explicit answer:It agrees with the Hilbert class field of Q of square root minus thirty. Both alternatives have been computed independently from their class numbers and ramification.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 23 5 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A modulus of a number field is , with a nonzero integral ideal and a subset of the real places. Let be the group of fractional ideals prime to , and let consist of principal ideals with at each prime power in and at each selected real place. The ray class group isThe ray class field is the finite abelian extension for which the Artin map has kernel and induces an isomorphism . Equivalently it is the maximal abelian extension whose conductor divides .
To compute its order use the ray class exact sequence, including signatures:The middle map lifts a residue and sign tuple to an element of by weak approximation theorem, then takes its principal ideal as a ray class. Different lifts differ by a principal ray factor. Its kernel consists exactly of tuples represented by global units. Every ordinary ideal class has a representative prime to the finite modulus, again by weak approximation theorem; this gives surjectivity of the last map. If denotes the ray units, the kernel of the unit map is . The Chinese remainder theorem and counting units in each prime-power quotient give the ray class number formula
First take . Its ring of integers is , where and . The Minkowski bound for ideal classes is , so every ideal class has a representative of norm one and . Its units are the six roots of unity. Modulo seven, the polynomial has distinct roots , and thereforeThe unit group of this quotient has order . The unit maps to , which has order six; consequently unit reduction is injective and . The ray class number formula gives .
We also identify the quotient explicitly. Conjugation interchanges the two factors, so the residue norm is . Its kernel has order six and equals the image of the six units, since . HenceThe field has degree six over , since the degrees over are twelve and two. It is unramified outside seven by the cyclotomic computation and the base-change argument above. At primes over seven, has completion , and is the tame degree-six cyclotomic extension; its conductor exponent is one. Its relative arithmetic Artin symbol at an ideal prime to seven acts byIf with , then . Thus the Artin map kills the principal ray subgroup. It factors through the order-six ray class group; the residue norm quotient computed above shows that it is onto the degree-six Galois group, so the fields coincide. This proves the explicit ray class field of Q of square root minus three modulo seven:
Now take , and write . Its ring of integers is , its discriminant is , and its units are . The quotient by iswhose two units are both images of . The ray class exact sequence therefore gives .
For its class number, the Minkowski bound for ideal classes is , so each ideal class contains an integral ideal of norm at most three. The primes of norms two and three areThese are the only nontrivial possibilities within the bound, and their ideal classes coincide and have order at most two. The ideal is not principal: its being principal would give an integer solution to , which is impossible. Thus , the ideal class group is , and the ray field is the Hilbert class field.
We verify its actual identity rather than stopping at the degree. PutThe two quadratic fields and are distinct, so and . The integral elements are a rational basis. Their trace matrix is the Kronecker product of the two quadratic trace matrices, with discriminants and . Its determinant is therefore . The discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice shows that the field discriminant divides . On the other hand the relative discriminant ideal formula givesThe norm on the right is a positive integer, so equality is forced. Thus the relative discriminant ideal is the unit ideal, and is unramified at every finite prime. There are no real places of . The extension is quadratic and therefore Abelian; its degree equals , identifying it with the Hilbert class field of Q of square root minus six. Hence the ray class field of Q of square root minus six modulo square root minus six is
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 123 1 Solution 2026-09-28
Write . The field trace gives a nondegenerate -bilinear trace pairingThe inverse different, or codifferent, is the trace-dual latticeIt contains , because the trace of an element integral over belongs to the integrally closed ring . It is stable under multiplication by : if and , then . Nondegeneracy of the trace pairing and finite generation of show that this trace dual is a finitely generated -module spanning . Therefore it is a fractional ideal of .
The discriminant ideal is locally generated bywhere is a local -basis of . Equivalently, it is the image of the determinant of the trace pairingThis formulation makes the definition independent of a basis, since changing a basis multiplies its discriminant by the square of the determinant of the change-of-basis matrix.
The asserted identity of ideals can be checked after localization at every nonzero prime ideal of . We may therefore assume that is a discrete valuation ring and choose a basis of . Let be its trace-dual basis, so ; this is a basis of . If , thenThus the determinant measuring the inclusion is . The determinant description of the norm of a fractional ideal consequently givesLocalization then proves the equality over the original Dedekind domain.
Finally, the determinant-of-pairing map identifies the invertible -module with the discriminant ideal. Hence in the ideal class groupup to the harmless inverse caused by the convention used to identify invertible modules with fractional ideals. In either convention the class is a square.
For , reduction of modulo gives . Its unit group is covered by the units of . The ray class exact sequence therefore identifies the ray class group with the ordinary ideal class group, of order two. Consequently this ray class field is the Hilbert class field of Q of square root minus six. To verify its lack of ramification, the integral basis candidate , where , has discriminant . The relative discriminant formula also forces the field discriminant to be divisible by . Equality proves that the relative discriminant ideal is trivial.
Relative discriminant 2026-10-03
The relative discriminant of a finite extension of number fields is the discriminant ideal of over . It satisfiesand its prime divisors are exactly the ramified finite primes.