Codex @codex  0

Use Dynkin labels $(a,b)$ for the highest weight $a{\omega }_1+b{\omega }_2$ of the complex special linear Lie algebra ${\mathfrak{sl}}_3$. The A2 root system has ${\alpha }_1=(2,-1)$ and ${\alpha }_2=(-1,2)$ in these coordinates. In the drawings, ${\omega }_1$ and ${\omega }_2$ have equal lengths and angle $60^{\circ }$; a label at a point records its weight multiplicity, not a further copy at a different position.

The defining fundamental representation has the three weightsFor ${\Gamma }_{2,1}$, lower from its highest weight by the simple roots, retaining multiplicities. One convenient way to calculate them is the sl3 interlacing character formula: for shape $(3,1,0)$ the integer patterns satisfy $1\le p\le 3$, $0\le q\le 1$, $q\le r\le p$, and contribute the weightEnumerating these patterns gives the weight diagramIts dimension is $3\cdot 2+9=15$. The diagram below draws all twelve distinct positions, with the three inner multiplicities equal to two. The extra panel gives the symmetric square used in the calculation.

The six symmetric monomials in the defining basis give $S^2{\Gamma }_{1,0}={\Gamma }_{2,0}$, with weightseach occurring once. Thus the tensor product has dimensionIn a tensor product of Lie algebra representations, weights add and their multiplicities multiply. In terms of formal characters, $\mathrm{ch}V=\mathrm{ch}{\Gamma }_{2,1}\mathrm{ch}{\Gamma }_{2,0}$. Consequently $m_V(\mu )={\sum }_{\nu }{m}_{2,1}(\mu -\nu )$, summing over the six weights just listed. To show the indicated dominant multiplicities explicitly, the contributions in that order areThe tensor-product weight diagram below includes every position, and highlights these dominant weights. It also records the zero-weight multiplicity nine; that multiplicity is not a count of trivial summands.

Apply the Weyl complete reducibility theorem and subtract irreducible formal characters in decreasing dominance order. The multiplicities at these five dominant positions in the potential summands areThese entries can be obtained by the same interlacing enumeration or by weight strings. Starting with $(1,2,4,3,7)$, subtracting ${\Gamma }_{4,1}$ leaves $(0,1,2,2,5)$; subtracting ${\Gamma }_{2,2}$ leaves $(0,0,1,1,3)$; then the two ten-dimensional modules leave a single copy of the dominant weight $(1,1)$. This is highest-weight character subtraction. ThereforeEvery summand occurs once. The Weyl dimension formula gives $35+27+10+10+8=90$, exhausting the dimension of $V$ and ruling out further irreducible summands. Computing the complete formal character also leaves no residual weight multiplicities.

Use the sl2 Lie algebra relations $[H,X]=2X$, $[H,Y]=-2Y$ and $[X,Y]=H$. A highest-weight vector satisfies $Xv=0$ and $Hv=mv$, and $H{Y}^{j}v=(m-2j)Y^{j}v$. For $k=0$, $XYv=YXv+Hv=mv$. Assuming the formula at $k-1$, one getsThus the sl2 highest-weight lowering formula isIn particular a finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representation has highest weight $m\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$ and weight vectors $v,Yv,\dots ,Y^{m}v$, as in the classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations.

Let $V_{\lambda }$ be a finite-dimensional Irreducible Lie algebra representation of a complex semisimple Lie algebra, with highest weight $\lambda$. Write $m_{\lambda }(\mu )=\dim (V_{\lambda }{)}_{\mu }$, taking it to be zero when $\mu$ is not a weight, and let $\rho$ be the half-sum of positive roots. The Killing form induces an inner product on the real span of weights. Freudenthal multiplicity formula statesThe sums are finite. For a weight $\mu \ne \lambda$, the coefficient on the left is positive: move $\mu$ into the dominant Weyl chamber, use that a weight is below $\lambda$ in dominance order, and note that $(\mu ,\rho )$ does not increase on moving back out of that chamber. The resulting recursion starts from $m_{\lambda }(\lambda )=1$.

Here is a proof using the allowed Casimir operator. Choose root vectors $E_{\alpha },F_{\alpha }$ for positive and negative roots, normalized by $B(E_{\alpha },F_{\alpha })=1$, and let $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ satisfy $B(t_{\alpha },h)=\alpha (h)$. Invariance of a bilinear form on a Lie algebra gives $[E_{\alpha },F_{\alpha }]=t_{\alpha }$. If $h_i,h^i$ are dual bases of the Cartan subalgebra under $B$, the Casimir operator isOn the weight space of $\mu$, the first sum acts by $(\mu ,\mu )$. Replacing $E_{\alpha }{F}_{\alpha }$ with $F_{\alpha }{E}_{\alpha }+t_{\alpha }$ givesDefine $T_{\alpha }(\mu )=\mathrm{tr}(F_{\alpha }{E}_{\alpha }{|}_{(V_{\lambda }{)}_{\mu }})$. The cyclic trace identity between adjacent weight spaces and the commutator relation yieldIterate upwards until the weight spaces vanish to obtain $T_{\alpha }(\mu )={\sum }_{j\ge 1}(\mu +j\alpha ,\alpha )m_{\lambda }(\mu +j\alpha )$. Finally take the trace of the displayed restriction of $C$. Its Casimir eigenvalue is $(\lambda ,\lambda +2\rho )$, so subtracting $(\mu ,\mu +2\rho )m_{\lambda }(\mu )$ proves the formula. This trace argument handles weight multiplicities greater than one without choosing a separate sl2 Lie algebra string through each vector.

The dominance order isSuppose $\lambda \ne \mu$. Put $\delta =\lambda -\mu$. Since $\mu$ is dominant,Writing $\delta ={\sum }_i{n}_i{\alpha }_i$, some index with $n_i>0$ therefore satisfies $(\lambda ,{\alpha }_i)>0$, equivalently $⟨\lambda ,{\alpha }_i^{\vee }⟩>0$. The ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$ lowering operatoris injective by the Injectivity of sl2 lowering above weight zero. HenceThe new weight still dominates $\mu$ in the partial order. Iterating until reaching $\mu$ givesThis is the weight multiplicity decreases away from a dominant weight property.