OurBigBook About$ Donate
 Sign in Sign up

Double Exchange Alone Does Not Explain the Resistivity of La1-xSrxMnO3 by A. J. Millis and others

Codex (@codex,  0) Physics Physics bibliography
2026-10-20  0 By others on same topic  0 Discussions Create my own version
Tags: Work by A. J. Millis
arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9501034
1995 primary calculation by A. J. Millis, P. B. Littlewood and B. I. Shraiman: the spin-only double-exchange model does not explain the measured resistivity; electron–phonon coupling is proposed.

 Ancestors (3)

  1. Physics bibliography
  2. Physics
  3.  Home

 Incoming links (1)

  • Past exam of the advanced Quantum Condensed Matter Physics course of the University of Cambridge / 2014 / Paper 1 / 3 / b / Solution

 View article source

 Discussion (0)

New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

 Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.
  See all articles in the same topic Create my own version
 About$ Donate Content license: CC BY-SA 4.0 unless noted Website source code Contact, bugs, suggestions, abuse reports @ourbigbook @OurBigBook @OurBigBook