For bipartite pure source and target states with positive target entanglement entropy, the optimal rate of LOCC conversion with vanishing output error is the ratio of their entanglement entropies. Here vanishing error means that the trace distance between the output and tends to zero; a recorded failure probability must also tend to zero. Entanglement concentration first provides Bell pairs, and entanglement dilution needs such pairs. This achieves the ratio. Conversely, refine the output into pure branches. Average monotonicity of pure-state entanglement entropy bounds their average entropy by the input entropy; continuity bound for quantum conditional entropy, with trivial conditioning, makes the output entropy loss per target tend to zero. This forbids a larger rate. The convention permits approximations for finite blocks: exact deterministic conversion of every finite block can obey stricter majorization constraints. The reversible concentration construction is given in the original concentration paper.
Entanglement dilution 2026-10-14
Entanglement dilution uses local operations and classical communication to prepare partially entangled states from maximally entangled states, such as Bell pairs. For many identical bipartite pure targets, the asymptotic cost in Bell pairs per target, allowing a vanishing approximation error, is their entanglement entropy in bits. The quantum typical subspace of the target's Schmidt coefficients has almost all its weight and dimension at most . A maximally entangled state of this dimension can be converted to the normalized truncated target by Nielsen's pure-state conversion theorem. The resulting state approaches the full target as the retained weight tends to one. Average monotonicity of pure-state entanglement entropy and entropy continuity give the converse lower bound. This is the reverse asymptotic task to entanglement concentration.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 51 3 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Use the usual asymptotic convention: the output approaches the desired -copy pure target in trace distance, and any recorded failure probability tends to zero. Define the binary entropyThe entanglement entropies per source and target are and . The asymptotic pure-state entanglement conversion rate isBoth achievability and the upper bound matter here.
For entanglement concentration, expand sources in their correlated computational basis. Every pair of strings of Hamming weight has the same amplitude . Alice measures only this weight, without resolving the individual string. Bob's string has the same weight automatically. Conditional on , the normalized state is maximally entangled on correlated strings. Its outcome probability is , a binomial distribution. By the weak law of large numbers, in probability; Stirling's formula then gives . A uniform Schmidt vector on entries is majorized by a uniform vector on entries padded with zeros. Thus Nielsen's pure-state conversion theorem converts the conditional state into that many Bell pairs exactly. For any fixed , one obtains at least Bell pairs with probability tending to one.
For entanglement dilution, consider the Schmidt strings of targets with probabilities . The quantum typical subspace retains strings satisfyingThe retained probability tends to one by the weak law applied to the independent variables . The number of retained strings is at most , because their probabilities sum to at most one. Normalize the target after truncation to those strings. Its squared overlap with the full target is . A uniform Schmidt vector of dimension , with , is majorized by the truncated target's Schmidt vector padded with zeros: the sum of its largest entries is at least . Hence Bell pairs prepare the truncated target exactly by LOCC. Its trace distance from the true target is . Combining concentration and dilution achieves any rate . Choosing margins tending sufficiently slowly to zero attains the ratio as a limiting rate.
For the converse, average monotonicity of pure-state entanglement entropy follows from Concavity of Von Neumann entropy: a measurement by one party leaves the other party's reduction unchanged on average, so its average conditional entropy cannot increase. Refine local measurement records, including local discarded systems, to obtain pure output branches on the output qubits of each party. Iterating the concavity argument givesLet and let the squared-overlap error of the average output be . Define , the pure-state trace distance. Concavity of the square root gives . Partial trace cannot increase trace distance, so the reduced states are also within . The continuity bound for quantum conditional entropy, with trivial conditioning and local dimension , impliesConsequentlywhich excludes a limiting rate exceeding .
The vanishing-error convention is essential. If exact deterministic conversion were required for every finite block, majorization would also require the largest squared Schmidt coefficient to satisfy , henceThis can be strictly smaller than the entropy ratio: at , the two bounds are approximately and . Thus the boxed rate answers the standard asymptotic task, rather than imposing unmentioned exact zero-error conditions on every finite block.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2010 iii Paper 51 3 e Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Applying the optimal single-copy filter independently gives a random number of exact successful targets with binomial distributionThe weak law of large numbers gives in probability. In contrast, collective entanglement concentration and entanglement dilution yield asymptotically targets with vanishing output error. The improvement is strict, not just nonnegative. Differentiating binary entropy givesSince , it follows thatThis is collective advantage over independent two-qubit filtering. Independent filtering discards the entanglement in product-state failure branches; the collective reversible asymptotic procedure avoids that extensive loss. The separately filtered targets are exact conditional on success, whereas the collective statement uses the vanishing-error convention from the previous part. Here the counted outputs are target states ; that is also the notation in the original printed question.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ii Paper 2 15D b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Alice adjoins and applies a local unitary whose action on the relevant inputs isMeasuring and obtaining zero leaves the unnormalized stateso the normalized state is the Bell state . The success probability is .
Applying this entanglement concentration independently to pairs yields an expected Bell pairs. Alice and Bob measure successful pairs in the computational basis to obtain identical secret random bits; public communication identifies successful positions without revealing outcomes. These bits form a secret key for a one-time pad of expected length .
Past exam of the quantum information course of the University of Cambridge 2015 Paper 1 3 a Solution 2026-10-20
A bipartite pure state is entangled when it is not a product state. Its Schmidt decomposition is , where and . More than one nonzero coefficient means entanglement. The two reduced density matrices have the same nonzero spectrum, and their Von Neumann entropy is the pure-state entanglement entropy. A maximally entangled pair of qubits has one bit of this entropy.
For mixed states, classical correlations are not sufficient: a separable quantum state is a convex mixture , and entanglement means that no such decomposition exists. A reduced entropy alone no longer measures mixed-state entanglement. An entanglement witness or a suitable separability criterion can detect it.
Local unitary transformations preserve the Schmidt spectrum. More general local operations and classical communication can discard entanglement but cannot freely create it from a separable input. Nielsen's pure-state conversion theorem gives the exact deterministic criterion: is possible precisely when . In decreasing order, every partial sum for the input is no larger than the corresponding output sum, with equal totals. The direction matters: a uniform spectrum can be converted to a concentrated one; a product state cannot deterministically become a Bell pair.
A probabilistic local filter can concentrate a partially entangled pair. For with , Alice's successful operator produces equal amplitudes. The outcome is a Bell pair with probability ; a complementary operator supplies a complete measurement. Failure is heralded, so there is no deterministic creation of a more entangled pair. This illustrates entanglement concentration.
Many-copy entanglement distillation and entanglement dilution connect noisy or nonuniform resources with standard Bell pairs. Entanglement enables quantum teleportation and other protocols, but classical communication is still required; the no-communication theorem excludes message transmission merely by choosing a distant local measurement.