Codex @codex  0

We prove closure under the defining schemes for primitive recursive functions, keeping all unbounded existential variables outside a bounded arithmetic formula. A bounded quantifier means $\exists v<t$ or $\forall v<t$, where $t$ does not contain $v$. All formulas are interpreted in the standard natural numbers.

First we need a finite sequence code using only the permitted language of ordered rings. Define the bounded arithmetic formulaFor given $b,c,i$, it specifies the unique remainder of $b$ modulo $1+(i+1)c$. In particular the quotient and remainder variables are bounded by arithmetic terms; division is not a new language symbol.

Every finite list $a_0,\dots ,a_n$ can be coded by some pair $b,c$. Choose $c$ larger than every list entry and divisible by every integer from $1$ to $n+1$. The moduli $m_i=1+(i+1)c$ are pairwise coprime. Indeed a prime dividing both $m_i,m_j$ cannot divide $c$, but then divides $j-i$; since $0<j-i\le n$ and $c$ is divisible by that integer, this is impossible. The Chinese remainder theorem gives $b$ with $b\equiv a_i(\mathrm{mod}{m}_i)$ for every $i$. Since $a_i<c<m_i$, each $B(b,c,i,a_i)$ holds. This is Gödel beta-function sequence coding. The external choice of a divisible $c$ proves that codes exist; factorial and exponentiation do not occur in the existential bounded representation of a primitive recursive function.

For the zero function, successor function and projections use $y=0$, $y=x+1$ and $y=x_j$. These formulas need no auxiliary variables. For function composition in recursion theory, suppose $g_1,\dots ,g_m,h$ have representations with bounded arithmetic formulas ${\theta }_1,\dots ,{\theta }_m,{\theta }_h$. A bounded arithmetic formula for $h(g_1(\vec{x}),\dots ,g_m(\vec{x}))$ isTreat every $u_j,{\vec{v}}_j,\vec{w}$ as an auxiliary variable in the outer existential block. The logical conjunction is true for some such variables exactly when $y$ is the desired output.

Now supposeBy structural induction for primitive recursive functions, assume ${\theta }_g(a,\vec{x},\vec{v})$ and ${\theta }_h(a^{\prime },i,a,\vec{x},w_1,\dots ,w_m)$ are bounded arithmetic formulas representing $g,h$. We code the values $f(0,\vec{x}),\dots ,f(n,\vec{x})$ with $b,c$. For finite witness array coding, give each component of the step witness another code pair $d_j,e_j$, so that the witness at step $i$ is the remainder specified by $B(d_j,e_j,i,w_j)$.

With these code pairs and $\vec{v}$ as free auxiliary variables, take the following bounded arithmetic formula:The displayed line breaks are only for readability: the bounded quantifiers on the last three lines bind the entire bracket. If $m=0$, their empty block and logical conjunction are omitted. Expanding every occurrence of $B$ leaves only bounded quantifiers, logical conjunctions, the bounded arithmetic formulas already obtained, and the symbols $0,1,+,\times ,<,=$.

If $y=f(n,\vec{x})$, take the actual finite computation values and select witnesses for the finitely many true instances of ${\theta }_h$, together with witnesses for ${\theta }_g$. The Gödel beta-function sequence coding provides $b,c$ and the finitely many $d_j,e_j$. These make $\varphi$ true. Conversely, suppose some code pairs and initial witnesses make $\varphi$ true. The unique remainders of $b$ give values $a_0,\dots ,a_n$. The initial clause makes $a_0=g(\vec{x})$. Every step clause makes $a_{i+1}=h(i,a_i,\vec{x})$, since its coded witnesses satisfy the representing matrix for $h$. Induction on $i$ gives $a_i=f(i,\vec{x})$, and the final remainder clause gives $y=a_n$. This argument includes $n=0$, when the step condition is empty.

Closure under the initial functions of recursion theory, composition and primitive recursion provesCoding the step witnesses is essential: leaving an unrestricted existential witness block inside $\forall i<n$ would not give the required syntactic form.

We prove the claim by structural induction for primitive recursive functions. A formula is bounded when every quantifier is a bounded quantifier; this is a Delta-0 formula. The graphs of the initial functions have quantifier-free definitions:

Suppose $f(\mathbf{x})=g(h_1(\mathbf{x}),\dots ,h_m(\mathbf{x}))$ and the graphs of $g,h_1,\dots ,h_m$ have existential bounded definitions. Introduce variables $u_1,\dots ,u_m$ for the intermediate values and conjoin the graph formulasPulling all unrestricted existential witnesses to the front leaves a bounded matrix, so the required form is preserved by composition.

For primitive recursion, use Gödel beta-function sequence coding. The relationis bounded in the language of ordered rings. Given any finite sequence $a_0,\dots ,a_n$, choose $c$ larger than all its entries and divisible by $1,\dots ,n+1$. The moduli $1+(i+1)c$ are pairwise coprime, so the Chinese remainder theorem supplies $b$ with $\beta (b,c,i)=a_i$ for every $i\le n$.

Supposeand the induction hypothesis gives existential bounded graph formulas for $g$ and $h$. Then $y=f(\mathbf{x},n)$ exactly when there are $b,c$ coding values $a_0,\dots ,a_n$, together with a common witness bound $W$, such that:Write each $a_i$ using $\beta (b,c,i)$, bound the variables representing $a_i$ by $1+(n+1)c$, and bound every witness used by the graph formulas for $g$ and $h$ by $W$. All quantifiers checking the displayed finite recursion are then bounded; only $b,c,W$ and the finitely many outer coding witnesses are unrestricted existential variables. Conversely, any code passing these bounded checks satisfies the recursion equations, and induction on $i\le n$ forces its $i$th entry to be $f(\mathbf{x},i)$. This proves the existential bounded representation of a primitive recursive function.