The set contains zero. It is closed under negatives because whenever . If and , thensince is an ideal of . Also, any can be written with and , givingThis proves that is an ideal of .
Clearly , by taking denominator one. Conversely, if , then for some positive integer . The condition implies . Since is a prime ideal, forces . HenceIn particular, is nonzero because it contains the nonzero ideal , and it is proper: otherwise its intersection with would contain . This is the concrete extension of an ideal and contraction of an ideal calculation for the localization that inverts nonzero integers.
Past exam of the commutative algebra course of the University of Oxford 2017 3 b Solution 2026-10-25
Let be a prime ideal of disjoint from the multiplicatively closed set . In the localization , its extension of an ideal isIndeed, finite sums of such fractions have a common denominator in and numerator in , and every generator has this form.
We show that its contraction of an ideal recovers :One inclusion is immediate. Conversely, if with and , equality of fractions in the field of fractions of the integral domain gives . Since and is a prime ideal, .
If , contracting would therefore give , contrary to the hypothesis. HenceWe will also need the fact that is a prime ideal, part of the prime ideal correspondence for localization. It is proper by the contraction identity, since otherwise . If , multiplication by the denominator gives , and contraction gives . Thus or , so one of the two fractions belongs to .
Past exam of the commutative algebra course of the University of Oxford 2023 3 b Solution 2026-10-25
Write . Every element of the extension of an ideal is a fraction with and : a finite sum of such fractions has a common denominator and numerator still in the ideal . If , then , soConversely, let be a nilpotent element of the localization at a prime ideal . For some , . The vanishing criterion in a module localization supplies with . It follows thatso . Since ,This proves that the nilradical commutes with localization:The multiplication by is necessary: the numerator of a nilpotent element in a localization need not itself be nilpotent in .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 7 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let , let act on through , and write for the extension of an ideal generated by . Since , the fiber ring has the canonical presentationsThe first isomorphism sends to modulo . Its inverse sends the class of to . The tensor balancing relation, reduction modulo and the fraction relations show that these maps are well-defined and inverse. Thus the description is canonical and does not depend on chosen representatives.
Suppose is a prime ideal of with . Then and is disjoint from . Its localization is a proper prime, since the quotient is the localization of the integral domain . It contains , and therefore gives a primeConversely, for a prime , take its contraction under the ring homomorphism , . Contraction preserves primality. Every with maps to zero, while every with maps to a unit and hence cannot belong to a proper prime. Thus .
These constructions are inverse. For a prime disjoint from , the fraction belongs to its localized extension exactly when some has ; primality then implies . In the other direction, every element of has a representative , and membership in is equivalent to membership of because the denominator is a unit. Hence is recovered by extending its contraction and quotienting. We have proved the canonical fiber of the map on spectra correspondence:If a denominator maps to zero, the fiber ring is the zero ring and both sets are empty; the same argument includes this case.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 101 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The induced map on the spectrum of a commutative ring is contraction of an ideal:To see that it is well defined, let be a prime ideal of . Its inverse image is an ideal of , and it is proper because . If , then , whence or . This proves that the inverse image is a prime ideal.
For any ideal , its extension of an ideal to is . We haveThus inverse images of Zariski-closed sets are Zariski-closed sets, which proves that is a continuous map.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 101 1 v a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
There is an exact sequence of -modulesIf is a flat module over , tensoring this sequence with preserves its left exactness. The image of each tensor product inside is the corresponding extension of an ideal, soBoth displayed inclusions therefore hold. This is the flat extension preserves finite ideal intersections property.
The prime ideals of with are the zero ideal and the principal ideals generated by nonconstant primitive polynomials that are irreducible in .
To prove the description, invert the nonzero integers to obtain the localization . The extension of an ideal consists of the polynomials with and . Its contraction is : if and , the defining condition puts , so primeness gives . The prime ideal correspondence for localization makes this extension a proper prime ideal of .
If , its extension has a nonzero generator because is a principal ideal domain. Dividing this generator by its rational polynomial content gives an integer-coefficient primitive polynomial generating the same extended ideal. Divisibility descent by Gauss lemma for polynomials then gives in . The proper prime ideal in makes irreducible there. Conversely, any such polynomial generates a prime ideal in whose contraction is and whose intersection with is zero.
The intersection condition is essential: is a maximal ideal of , since its quotient ring is , but it is not principal. A common divisor of and must be a unit, which would generate the whole ring.