Let , let act on through , and write for the extension of an ideal generated by . Since , the fiber ring has the canonical presentations
The first isomorphism sends to modulo . Its inverse sends the class of to . The tensor balancing relation, reduction modulo and the fraction relations show that these maps are well-defined and inverse. Thus the description is canonical and does not depend on chosen representatives.
Suppose is a prime ideal of with . Then and is disjoint from . Its localization is a proper prime, since the quotient is the localization of the integral domain . It contains , and therefore gives a prime
Conversely, for a prime , take its contraction under the ring homomorphism , . Contraction preserves primality. Every with maps to zero, while every with maps to a unit and hence cannot belong to a proper prime. Thus .
These constructions are inverse. For a prime disjoint from , the fraction belongs to its localized extension exactly when some has ; primality then implies . In the other direction, every element of has a representative , and membership in is equivalent to membership of because the denominator is a unit. Hence is recovered by extending its contraction and quotienting. We have proved the canonical fiber of the map on spectra correspondence:
If a denominator maps to zero, the fiber ring is the zero ring and both sets are empty; the same argument includes this case.
The induced map on the spectrum of a commutative ring is contraction of an ideal:
To see that it is well defined, let be a prime ideal of . Its inverse image is an ideal of , and it is proper because . If , then , whence or . This proves that the inverse image is a prime ideal.
For any ideal , its extension of an ideal to is . We have
Thus inverse images of Zariski-closed sets are Zariski-closed sets, which proves that is a continuous map.
There is an exact sequence of -modules
If is a flat module over , tensoring this sequence with preserves its left exactness. The image of each tensor product inside is the corresponding extension of an ideal, so
Both displayed inclusions therefore hold. This is the flat extension preserves finite ideal intersections property.