Choose the ellipsoidal Lyapunov function . Direct substitution of the printed vector field gives
The weighted Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives , so
For any initial point with , choose with . The compact ellipse is positively invariant, since on its boundary. Inside it,
This establishes global forward existence for those trajectories and convergence to the origin, while the First Lyapunov theorem establishes stability. The origin is asymptotically stable and its basin contains . The PDF coefficient in the second equation is , with the entire linear term ; placing the factor on the linear term would destroy this factorization.
The First Lyapunov theorem states that for a locally Lipschitz autonomous system with equilibrium zero, if a function is positive definite near zero and , then the equilibrium is Lyapunov stable. To prove it, choose a small sphere inside that neighborhood. Compactness and positivity give . Continuity at zero gives a smaller ball where . Since cannot increase along a trajectory, a trajectory starting there cannot first cross the sphere where . It stays within the sphere for all future time, with continuation justified by confinement in a compact subset of the vector field's domain. This proves stability for every sufficiently small .
The LaSalle invariance principle states that on a compact positively invariant set on which , every trajectory approaches the largest invariant subset of . If that subset is just the equilibrium, the trapping and stability argument proves asymptotic stability.
For example take , and . Then , which is not strictly negative on the punctured plane. Nevertheless its sublevel discs are compact and invariant, and a trajectory confined to must have , hence . LaSalle gives asymptotic stability despite the non-strict orbital derivative of this particular energy function.
The printed phrase about nonexistence of a strict Lyapunov function must be understood as a limitation of the chosen candidate. In this example a strict function actually exists:
More generally the converse Lyapunov theorem supplies local strict functions for asymptotically stable sufficiently smooth systems. LaSalle avoids having to find such a function; it does not show that none exists.
The direct First Lyapunov theorem says that a continuously differentiable positive-definite function near an equilibrium, with , proves stability. LaSalle invariance principle says that in a compact positively invariant set, trajectories approach the largest invariant subset of . Under the terminology in which “first theorem” means the linearization theorem, eigenvalues with negative real part imply asymptotic stability, while zero-real-part eigenvalues leave the test inconclusive. Here the linearization has eigenvalues , so the direct criterion is needed.
Write and choose
Near zero, is positive definite. Along solutions,
The component containing the origin of a sufficiently small closed sublevel set is compact, lies in and is positively invariant. The set has ; to remain there also requires , so its largest invariant subset is just the origin. The two theorems establish the origin is asymptotically stable.
Let denote the flow map generated by .
is nonpositive on .
The First Lyapunov theorem says that the existence of such a function makes the origin Lyapunov stable. To prove it, choose a sufficiently small closed ball . By compactness and positive definiteness,
By continuity, some satisfies whenever . Along a trajectory beginning in , cannot increase. Such a trajectory therefore cannot reach the sphere , where . Hence it remains in for every , which is Lyapunov stability.
The LaSalle invariance principle says that if a trajectory remains in a compact positively invariant set on which , then it approaches the largest invariant subset of .
Let be an equilibrium point of a dynamical system. A Lyapunov function on a neighbourhood of is a continuously differentiable function such that
and whose derivative along trajectories satisfies
The First Lyapunov theorem says that the existence of such a positive-definite proves Lyapunov stability of . If away from , the Second Lyapunov theorem strengthens this to asymptotic stability.
LaSalle invariance principle says that if a trajectory remains in a compact positively invariant set on which , then it approaches the largest invariant subset of
In particular, if that largest invariant subset consists only of , every trajectory in approaches .
Set
The stated identity gives
Hence, along the system,
Near the origin, is positive definite because for . The First Lyapunov theorem therefore gives stability.
Choose a sufficiently small compact invariant sublevel set
On we have . A trajectory can remain there only if
which occurs at . The choice excludes the two latter points, so the largest invariant subset of is the origin. LaSalle invariance principle now gives convergence to the origin. Thus, for every ,
This is an instance of damped mechanical energy as a Lyapunov function.
For , a fixed point satisfies . It is Lyapunov stable when, for every , there is such that
A Lyapunov function on a neighbourhood of is a continuously differentiable function such that
The First Lyapunov theorem states that such a function makes Lyapunov stable. If away from , then is locally asymptotically stable.
To prove stability, choose a closed ball contained in the domain of . On its boundary sphere , compactness and positive definiteness give
Continuity at supplies such that implies . Along a trajectory, cannot increase. Such a trajectory therefore cannot first reach the boundary sphere, where its value would be at least . This proves Lyapunov stability.
If away from , take a sufficiently small compact sublevel set of . The LaSalle invariance principle says that every trajectory in it approaches the largest invariant subset of , which is just . Hence the equilibrium is also asymptotically stable.
Put . The first-order system is
At an equilibrium point of a dynamical system, and , so the three fixed points are
Define
Then and
Moreover,
so is positive definite at the origin. It is therefore a damped mechanical energy as a Lyapunov function, and the First Lyapunov theorem proves that the origin is Lyapunov stable.
Since , choose a compact energy sublevel with . In this set, means . A trajectory can remain in only when , and the chosen sublevel excludes . Thus the largest invariant subset of is the origin. The LaSalle invariance principle proves that the origin is asymptotically stable.
Finally, is radially unbounded because its leading terms are . Every forward trajectory is therefore bounded. LaSalle's principle puts its omega-limit set inside
An omega-limit set of a bounded continuous trajectory is nonempty and connected. A connected subset of this three-point set is a singleton, so every trajectory has precisely one of the three fixed points as its omega-limit set.
A function near an equilibrium at the origin is a Lyapunov function if , for , and
The First Lyapunov theorem says these conditions imply stability. The second says that if the last inequality is strict away from the origin, then the origin is asymptotically stable.
To prove the first, fix a sufficiently small ball of radius . Positive definiteness and compactness give
Continuity at zero gives such that implies . Since cannot increase along a trajectory, that trajectory cannot meet the sphere , where . It therefore remains in the -ball for all forward time, which is stability.