Codex @codex  0

An exposed fault plane revealed as fault slip, differential motion and removal of cover bring it to the surface. On a normal fault, lowering the hanging wall can expose a planar footwall face. Continued exposure may preserve a bedrock scarp while weathering, erosion and collapse progressively modify its older portions. A hillslope following the plane therefore need not be an independent erosional surface that accidentally has the same orientation.

The block above an inclined fault plane. In reverse faulting it moves upward relative to the footwall.

A fault on which the hanging wall moves downward relative to the footwall. Local bending or collapse can create small normal faults even during a regional reverse-faulting event.

A normal fault is the plausible interpretation. The photograph shows a steep, exposed planar rock face with lower ground on its open side; this geometry is consistent with an exhumed footwall and a down-dropped hanging wall. A steep dip alone is not a unique indicator of shear sense, and the photograph does not supply a displaced marker proving the sense independently. Under an Andersonian faulting regime, a plausible maximum compression ${\sigma }_1$ is approximately vertical, with ${\sigma }_3$ horizontal in the extension direction and ${\sigma }_2$ approximately along strike.

The visible surface can be an exhumed fault surface, rather than an unrelated hillslope that happens to intersect a buried plane. Downward motion of the hanging wall exposes the footwall face; repeated displacement and removal of loose material can reveal a substantial length of the same fault plane. Where exposure is renewed faster than weathering, erosion and collapse erase it, that planar surface remains part of the hillside. The less weathered lower face and rougher, vegetated upper ground are consistent with differential exposure, though the photograph alone does not date individual events.

At greater distance or over longer times, erosion modifies the slope and the hillside will cross or obscure the fault plane. The correspondence is therefore a transient competition between fault slip, exhumation and surface processes, not a requirement that all hillslopes follow faults.

Use normalized image coordinates $(u,v)$ within the map rectangle, with $(0,0)$ at its upper left and $(1,1)$ at its lower right. A principal candidate thrust fault trace follows the sharp, approximately diagonal southwestern edge of the dissected high ground on the right: a practical tracing guide passes nearMark the upland, upper-right side as hanging wall and the smoother, lower-left basin side as footwall for a thrust dipping beneath the uplands. Use broken lines through the gaps, not one asserted continuous exposed rupture. A subsidiary candidate frontal segment follows the basin-facing edge of the isolated dissected ridge on the left, approximately $(0.04,0.32)$ through $(0.23,0.47)$ to $(0.34,0.61)$; place teeth toward its locally higher ridge side.

These are geomorphic interpretations of mountain fronts and scarps, not measured subsurface dip directions. On a conventional north-up reading the principal trend is broadly northwest–southeast, but the supplied map has no north arrow: the image-relative coordinates are the reproducible identification. Southwestern illumination means southwest-facing slopes are bright; brightness is a slope-orientation clue, not an elevation contour. Some aligned relief may be a fold scarp or an eroded lithological contact, so field confirmation and topographic profiles would test the candidate traces.

The offset layered sequence indicates reverse slip on the west-dipping fault: its western hanging wall moved up relative to the eastern footwall. With the fault strike perpendicular to the east–west image plane, an Andersonian faulting regime has ${\sigma }_1$ horizontal east–west, ${\sigma }_2$ horizontal north–south, and ${\sigma }_3$ vertical. Draw opposing compression arrows east–west and a smaller opposing pair vertically; the intermediate pair points into and out of the page.

For example, in east, north, up coordinates, a compression-positive effective stress tensor consistent with a $30^{\circ }$ reverse fault and zero cohesion isThese magnitudes illustrate one possible stress tensor, rather than a measurement from the photograph. With $\mu =1/\sqrt{3}$, the ${\sigma }_1$–${\sigma }_3$ Mohr circle is tangent to the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion at a plane $30^{\circ }$ from horizontal. The original failure-mechanics figure above sketches these principal stress directions.

A reverse fault can create a sharp mountain front by raising its hanging wall beside a lower footwall. Drainages entering the rising block may be deflected along the front or cut narrow gorges across it. In cross-section, draw a dipping fault with the hanging wall displaced up-dip and a surface-height contrast above the trace.

In Attachment A, mark the approximately east–west to west-northwest–east-southeast break between the southwestern mountain block and the central basin. Its approximate image coordinates run from $(0.03,0.56)$ through $(0.18,0.61)$ and $(0.34,0.65)$ to $(0.45,0.69)$. The abrupt topographic change and diversion of drainage along this front support the reverse faulting interpretation. It is the southern margin of the central basin, not the much straighter oblique valley farther northeast. The original interpretive figure gives a schematic section.

Put the reverse fault along the mountain-front trace identified in part (ii), with the mountainous southern/southwestern block as hanging wall and the central basin to its north/northeast as footwall. Draw teeth on the southern hanging wall side of the line. In the simplest cross-section the fault dips south and the southern block moves northward and up over the basin edge. The image constrains the surface trace and relative uplift more securely than its subsurface fault dip; the precise dip cannot be measured from this map alone.

Map the continuous break near the base of the rugged mountain front, following the low scarp across the smoother fan surfaces, rather than the ridgeline. With the same normalized image coordinates, an approximate trace follows $(0.04,0.56),(0.22,0.52),(0.43,0.60),(0.55,0.64)$, steps toward $(0.62,0.43)$, and continues via $(0.72,0.49),(0.88,0.64),(0.98,0.61)$. Some parts are much clearer than others and should be drawn as inferred or dashed where obscured.

The mountainous upper side of the image is the uplifted footwall; the smoother basin/fan side below is the downthrown hanging wall. A section perpendicular to the front has a normal fault dipping toward the basin. Attachment B has no printed north arrow, so these image-relative labels avoid assigning an unsupported compass direction. The original interpretive figure marks the trace and the central fault step-over.

A reverse or thrust fault earthquake is the expected end member: a hanging wall moves upwards relative to its footwall, accommodating north–south tectonic shortening. A plausible double-couple seismic source focal mechanism has an approximately east–west fault strike, a moderately north- or south-dipping fault plane, and up-dip fault slip. For example, right-hand-rule strike $090^{\circ }$, southward fault dip about $32^{\circ }$, and fault rake $+90^{\circ }$ specify a pure thrust mechanism.

In a lower-hemisphere equal-area plot, with shaded regions denoting compressional P first motions, this focal mechanism has a shaded central region and two unshaded outer lobes. The P axis is approximately horizontal north–south and the T axis approximately vertical for a symmetric idealization; for a single $32^{\circ }$ plane their axes are slightly tilted. The P and T axes of a double-couple seismic source need not exactly equal the regional principal stress axes. The nodal curves represent both the fault plane and its auxiliary plane; additional evidence is needed to choose between them.^[ref]

The geomorphology of active normal faulting records a competition between accumulated tectonic displacement and the ability of erosion, transport and deposition to modify it. A hanging wall moves down relative to a footwall, producing a fault scarp, mountain-front relief, and accommodation space for a sedimentary basin. Repeated earthquakes can build a large front even though each individual surface break is much smaller.^[ref]

The principal controls and their observable effects are:

Useful observations therefore include scarp profiles, repeated offsets of dated surfaces, drainage organization, and continuity along strike. A high rugged front is not by itself evidence of a high present fault slip rate; conversely, a muted or buried scarp need not mark an inactive fault.

For a surface-breaking reverse earthquake, expect a fault scarp or disrupted belt with the hanging wall displaced upward and commonly over the footwall. Small thrust faults, splays and backthrusts may repeat or override shallow deposits. Shortened soil, roads or other markers may buckle, while soft sediment can form pressure ridges and compression folds. Near the scarp, gravitational collapse and local bending can also produce tensile fissures and small normal faults; a reverse event need not create compression everywhere at the surface.

For a blind reverse rupture, expect coherent uplift and warping, newly tilted surfaces, or a fold scarp without a throughgoing primary fault offset. Small flexural-slip surfaces along bedding, secondary thrust faults or backthrusts, and opening cracks or small normal faults over the bent outer arc of the anticline can accompany the folding. Deformation may be distributed or localized at fold hinges. Thus a blind main fault does not imply an entirely unbroken ground surface, and secondary cracking must be distinguished from the principal rupture by its geometry and displacement pattern. Shaking-triggered landslides or soil liquefaction can accompany either case and should not automatically be mapped as primary tectonic rupture.^[ref]

A fault on which the hanging wall moves up relative to the footwall, accommodating shortening. A low-angle reverse fault is a thrust fault. The fault dip is a geometric property and should be distinguished from the direction of fault slip.