The condition makes
For
the squared norm is the Gaussian integral
Since , integration by parts gives the kinetic quotient
The potential quotient is
The variational principle therefore yields the Gaussian variational bound for an attractive Gaussian well
For the trial function, . The required Gaussian integrals are
The second formula follows by differentiating the first with respect to . Therefore
and division by gives the Gaussian variational bound for an attractive Gaussian well:
This is a good trial family because it consists of smooth, positive, square-integrable functions decaying at both infinities. Each is an even function, matching the symmetry of the lowest bound state in this even potential, and the parameter varies its width. It also permits exact Gaussian integrals. Its Gaussian tail need not equal the exact exponential tail of a negative-energy bound state for the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle to give a valid bound.
Differentiating the Gaussian variational bound for an attractive Gaussian well gives
Thus an interior stationary point obeys
The left side of the first equation increases strictly from zero to infinity, so there is exactly one such point. More explicitly,
so is a strictly convex function on and is its global minimum. At that minimum the stationarity equation gives
There is a continuous limiting zero at , although at exactly is not a square-integrable function and hence is not an admissible trial. For a positive zero, division by and squaring gives , so
is the unique positive zero. The other quadratic root is negative and inadmissible. Near zero,
so the graph leaves the origin with slope , falls to its unique negative minimum, rises through , and grows as at infinity.
Figure 1.
The Gaussian variational bound for an attractive Gaussian well at , showing its negative minimum and positive zero
. Details.
By the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle,
Thus the attractive well supports a negative-energy bound state for every .
It is enough to choose an admissible parameter, without solving the minimizing equation. Take in the Gaussian variational bound for an attractive Gaussian well. The Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle gives
where an explicit remainder is
The denominator tends to as , proving in Big O notation. More precisely the binomial series gives
and therefore
This is an upper bound on the exact ground state energy, rather than an assertion that the leading coefficient of its exact weak-potential expansion is .