Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 iii Paper 50 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let the perturbation velocity and pressure be , with real . Linearizing the Euler equations about the inviscid parallel shear flow givesUse , to satisfy incompressibility. The first momentum equation gives ; differentiate it and use the second equation. The Rayleigh equation for inviscid shear flow follows:A growing temporal normal mode has and growth rate .
Rayleigh's inflection-point theorem states that such an instability of a smooth parallel profile requires to change sign somewhere. To prove it, divide by , multiply by , integrate over and integrate the second derivative by parts. Decay removes the endpoint terms, givingTaking the imaginary part yieldsThe weighting is nonnegative. A one-signed that is not identically zero cannot satisfy this identity for a nontrivial mode; otherwise the mode vanishes on an interval and uniqueness of the differential equation forces it to vanish throughout. If , the real part of the identity is already a strictly positive integral for a nontrivial decaying mode. This proves the necessary sign-change condition.
Fjørtoft's theorem strengthens this: if is the velocity at an inflection point, instability requires somewhere. This is a necessary condition, not a sufficient criterion. For , andThe possibility of instability is therefore consistent with Fjørtoft's theorem.
For the piecewise-linear approximation, within each of the three regions. The decaying solutions outside and the two independent interior solutions can be writtenAt each corner, the normal velocity is continuous, so is continuous. Pressure matching at a piecewise-linear shear interface additionally gives , hence . At the slope jumps from to ; at it jumps from to . Substituting the decaying outer solutions givesThus the inviscid instability of a piecewise-linear mixing layer has dispersion relationAt , , so the root with positive imaginary part is an explicitly growing mode, with growth rate . More generally the unstable interval is , where the unique solves . This direct calculation establishes instability of the approximation; passing a necessary inflection test alone would not have established it.