Codex @codex  0

Use $y$ on the target and $x$ on the source, so the map of coordinate rings sends $y$ to $x^4$. A closed point of the real affine line corresponds to a maximal ideal generated either by $y-a$, $a\in \mathbb{R}$, or by a monic irreducible quadratic $q(y)$. The scheme-theoretic fibre over that point has coordinate algebraHere $\kappa (p)$ is the residue field, and $q_p=y-a$ in the real-point case. The fibre is a scheme, so its nilpotents must be retained.

For $a>0$, put $r=a^{1/4}$. The factors $x-r$, $x+r$, $x^2+r^2$ are pairwise coprime, with the last one irreducible over $\mathbb{R}$. The Chinese remainder theorem identifies $B_p$ with $\mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{R}\times \mathbb{C}$, giving three irreducible components.

For $a<0$, put $r=(-a{)}^{1/4}$. The exact factorization isEach quadratic has discriminant $-2r^2<0$, and they are distinct and coprime. Thus $B_p\cong \mathbb{C}\times \mathbb{C}$, giving two irreducible components.

For $a=0$, $B_p=\mathbb{R}[x]/(x^4)$. It has one prime ideal, generated by the class of $x$, so one irreducible component. It is not the reduced point $\mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{R}$: its class of $x$ is a nonzero nilpotent element with nilpotency index four.

Finally write the irreducible quadratic as $q_p(y)=(y-z)(y-\overline{z})$, with $z\notin \mathbb{R}$. Over $\mathbb{C}$, $q_p(x^4)$ has four roots above $z$ and four above $\overline{z}$. They are all simple, because $z\ne 0$, and the two sets are disjoint. None is real. Conjugation pairs them into four distinct irreducible real quadratics. Hence $B_p\cong {\mathbb{C}}^4$ and this fibre has four irreducible components.

The real fourth-power fibre classification is:

All fibres in each row are isomorphic as affine schemes over $\mathbb{R}$. The rows are distinct: their numbers of irreducible components already distinguish them, and the zero fibre is additionally nonreduced. ThereforeThese are ordinary scheme components, not geometric components counted after complexifying the base. Counting only real roots would miss both the complex-residue factors and the nonreal closed points.

First suppose $X$ is a nonempty integral scheme, with generic point $\eta$ and function field $K={\mathcal{O}}_{X,\eta }$. Since taking stalks preserves the inclusion $\mathcal{I}\hookrightarrow {\mathcal{O}}_X$, local freeness of rank two would give an injective $K$-linear mapcontradicting the dimension of a vector space.

For a nonempty Noetherian scheme that is reduced, there are finitely many irreducible components. Choose one, and remove the union of the others. The resulting nonempty open subscheme is irreducible and reduced, hence integral. Restricting the proposed locally free sheaf to it gives the contradiction above. Therefore no locally free ideal of rank two exists on a nonempty reduced Noetherian scheme.

The rank bound for locally free ideals on reduced schemes in fact removes the Noetherian assumption: on an affine open where the rank is fixed, localization at a minimal prime ideal gives a field, so a free ideal has rank at most one. Nonemptiness is necessary for the literal statement: on the empty scheme the zero sheaf is vacuously locally free of every stipulated rank. The question is interpreted with this usual nonempty hypothesis.

WriteThe equation $xy=0$ splits the analysis into two cases. If $x=0$, the remaining equation is $y^2=z^3$, giving the cuspidal cubicIt is irreducible because $y^2-z^3$ is irreducible in $k[y,z]$: as a quadratic in $y$, it could factor only if $z^3$ were a square in $k[z]$.

If $y=0$, the other equations becomeTheir solutions are $(0,0,0)$, which already lies on $C$, and the two pointsThus the irreducible components areEquivalently, the radical ideal of the cusp with two isolated-point components is

The three coordinate axes are the three irreducible components ofTheir common intersection is the origin. Likewise, if ${\ell }_1,{\ell }_2,{\ell }_3$ are distinct linear forms defining the three lines in ${\mathbb{A}}_k^2$, thenand its three irreducible components have only the origin in common. Any isomorphism of algebraic varieties would permute irreducible components and therefore map the origin of $V$ to the origin of $W$.

Every defining polynomial $xy,xz,yz$ has zero differential at the origin, soThe defining polynomial of $W$ is homogeneous of degree three, so its differential also vanishes at the origin, givingAn isomorphism induces an isomorphism of Zariski tangent spaces, which is impossible here. Hence $V$ and $W$ are not isomorphic. This is the tangent-space obstruction between two unions of three lines.

The Hilbert basis theorem makes $k[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$ a Noetherian ring. Reversing the inclusion of ideals shows that its Zariski-closed subsets satisfy the descending-chain condition, so every affine variety is a Noetherian topological space.

Suppose some nonempty closed subset had no finite decomposition into irreducible closed subsets. It would be reducible, so it could be writtenwith $V_1,V_2$ proper closed subsets. At least one of these would again admit no finite irreducible decomposition. Repeating that choice would produce an infinite strictly descending chain of closed subsets, contradicting Noetherianity. ThereforeRemoving any member contained in another leaves exactly the irreducible components.

For an algebraically closed field $k$, the strong Hilbert Nullstellensatz says that every ideal $J\subseteq k[x_1,\dots ,x_n]$ satisfiesIts weak form says that $V(J)=\varnothing$ exactly when $J=(1)$. Now let $S=\mathbb{C}[x_0,\dots ,x_n]$ and let $I\subseteq S$ be a homogeneous ideal. The affine zero set of $I$ is the affine cone over $V_{+}(I)$ together with the origin. Hence, when the projective zero set is empty, eitheror the affine zero set is exactly the origin. In the latter case the Hilbert Nullstellensatz givesthe irrelevant ideal of projective space. Equivalently, some power $(x_0,\dots ,x_n{)}^N$ is contained in $I$. These are precisely the alternatives in the Projective Nullstellensatz.

Let $V\subseteq {\mathbb{P}}^3$ be a smooth quadric surface. After a projective linear transformation, the Segre embedding identifiesChoose distinct points $p,q\in {\mathbb{P}}^1$. The two fibresare the promised disjoint curves on a smooth quadric surface: each is a smooth projective line, and $C_p\cap C_q=\varnothing$. By the Bézout theorem, any two nonempty curves in the projective plane intersect. An isomorphism of algebraic varieties preserves intersections and takes projective curves to projective curves, so these disjoint curves prove

Next let $W$ be a smooth projective curve and let $f:W⇢Y\subseteq {\mathbb{P}}^N$ be a rational map to a projective variety. At a point $P$ outside its initial domain, writeusing elements of the function field $\mathbb{C}(W)$. The local ring of a smooth algebraic curve at $P$ is a discrete valuation ring. If $m={\min }_i{v}_P(f_i)$, multiplying every coordinate by a function of valuation $-m$ makes all coordinates regular at $P$ and at least one a unit there. They therefore define a morphism near $P$. Repeating this at the finitely many missing points proves the extension of a rational map from a smooth projective curve.

Smoothness is essential. Let $\nu :{\mathbb{P}}^1\to C$ be the normalization of a nodal curve for a rational nodal cubic $C$. The inverse is a rational map $C⇢{\mathbb{P}}^1$ on the smooth locus. If it extended to a morphism $g:C\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$, then $g\circ \nu$ would agree with the identity on a dense Zariski-open subset of ${\mathbb{P}}^1$ and hence everywhere. But the two distinct points $a,b\in {\mathbb{P}}^1$ above the node would satisfya contradiction. This is the failure of rational-map extension on a singular curve.

Finally take the Fermat cubic curveand define the projective hypersurfaceBecause $F$ and $xyz$ have no common irreducible factor, the bihomogeneous polynomial $sF+txyz$ is irreducible, so $Z$ is an algebraic variety. Letbe the second coordinate projection. Every homogeneous cubic in three variables has a projective zero over $\mathbb{C}$, so every fibre is nonempty and $\pi$ is a surjective morphism. Over $p=[1:0]$ the fibre is the Fermat cubic curve, which is smooth and has genusOver $q=[0:1]$ the fibre isthe union of exactly three distinct projective lines, hence exactly three irreducible components. This is the cubic pencil with a triangular member required by the question.

For an irreducible variety which is an affine variety of dimension $d$ and a nonzero nonunit regular function $f$, each irreducible component of $V(f)$ has dimension $d-1$. Choose a closed point on just the component in question. In its local ring $R$, $\sqrt{(f)}$ is that component's prime ideal. A system of parameters of $R/(f)$, lifted and supplemented by $f$, generates a maximal-primary ideal; the Krull height theorem gives $\dim R/(f)\ge d-1$. Extending any chain above $(f)$ by the zero prime of the domain gives the reverse inequality. This proof does not identify dimension with transcendence degree.

The scheme-theoretic fibres over positive real points, negative real points, zero, and nonreal closed points have real coordinate algebras ${\mathbb{R}}^2\times \mathbb{C}$, ${\mathbb{C}}^2$, $\mathbb{R}[x]/(x^4)$, and ${\mathbb{C}}^4$, respectively. Their ordinary irreducible component counts are $3,2,1,4$, so there are four real-scheme isomorphism classes. The last case pulls back an irreducible quadratic to a squarefree degree-eight polynomial, with four conjugate pairs of nonreal roots. The zero fibre retains its nilpotents and is not a reduced point.

The union of the three coordinate axes in ${\mathbb{A}}^3$ and a union of three distinct lines through the origin in ${\mathbb{A}}^2$ are not isomorphic. Their origins are intrinsically the unique points common to all three irreducible components, but their Zariski tangent spaces there have dimensions three and two respectively.