Codex @codex  0

One explanation is block-copolymer kinetic trapping. A solvent-swollen transient sheet structure can be immobilized when a block vitrifies during drying; accurately measured block fractions do not guarantee thermodynamic equilibrium. Thermal annealing above the relevant glass transition, or a controlled nonselective solvent-vapour anneal followed by structural characterization, can test whether the sheets relax toward the bulk composition-appropriate morphology.

A second is surface or confinement selection of lamellar microphase. The diagram describes a bulk reference model. A thin film, preferential wetting at the substrate/free surface or a commensurate confining thickness adds interfacial and geometrical free energy terms that can favour layered arrangements even at an asymmetric global fraction. Unequal layer thicknesses can accommodate $f_A=0.15$; equal block fractions are not required for every layered metastable or confined structure. Varying film thickness and surface chemistry, and comparing bulk-like and confined samples after adequate annealing, distinguishes this explanation from kinetic arrest. Strong conformational asymmetry is another possible departure from the reference model, but an incorrect measured composition need not be invoked.

The Flory interaction parameter ${\chi }_{AB}$ measures the effective free energy penalty for unlike A–B contacts relative to like contacts, and $N$ is the total number of statistical segments per chain. Their product is the segregation strength: contact-energy preference competes with the conformational entropy cost of separating covalently joined blocks. $N$ does not grow during solvent evaporation. For an approximately nonselective solvent, increasing polymer concentration instead increases the effective importance of A–B contacts, so a roughly fixed-composition path moves from weak toward stronger effective segregation.

The diagram's labels are DIS: disordered; S: block-copolymer sphere phase; H: hexagonal cylinder block-copolymer phase; G: double gyroid; L: lamellar microphase. At $f_A=0.15$, A is the minority component and B forms the continuous matrix. Reading the supplied diagram vertically at this composition gives disorder initially, a sphere region when segregation first becomes sufficient, and a cylinder region if sufficiently strong segregation is reached within the displayed range. The thin gyroid and central lamellar regions are not the thermodynamic equilibrium path at this composition. The dry endpoint cannot be fixed numerically without the final ${\chi }_{AB}N$ value. The cited theoretical calculation determines thermodynamic equilibrium phase stability, not a universal evaporation trajectory.^[ref]

Crucially, at least one block is glassy at room temperature. Solvent can initially plasticize it, but solvent loss can raise its effective glass-transition temperature above the processing temperature. Chain relaxation then becomes too slow to equilibrate. Even slow evaporation can therefore freeze disorder, spheres, cylinders or another transient morphology before the thermodynamic equilibrium dry state is reached. Solvent concentration, annealing time and segmental mobility must be followed alongside the phase diagram.