Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 28 5 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A suitable large sieve statement is the following. If are separated modulo one by at least and is supported on consecutive integers, thenThe sharper classical constant also suffices, but is unnecessary for the requested bound. This is the exponential-sum large sieve.
Put , , and . By the orthogonality of roots of unity,At most of these residue counts are nonzero. The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality gives , and the frequency contributes exactly . Thus, if ,If for some prime, is empty and the result is immediate.
All fractions , , , are distinct reduced fractions. Their circular spacing is at least , because two distinct fractions of these denominators differ modulo one by at least . Apply the large sieve with and , and sum the preceding lower bounds:For and a positive sieve denominator, division provesWhen the denominator is zero this asserts no restriction; that degenerate case is interpreted as a vacuous bound.
For the least-nonresidue application, first establish the positive density of power-smooth integers. Fix , with an integer , and let tend to infinity. Choose ordered primes, with repetitions allowed, in the intervalTheir product satisfies . Every number has , so is -smooth. By partial summation of the Prime number theorem, or the Mertens theorem for reciprocal primes,The number of ordered representations is at leastbecause for .
This representation count must not be confused with a count of distinct integers. A number at most has at most prime factors in that interval, counted with multiplicity. There are therefore only a bounded number, depending on , of ordered -tuples which can occur as divisors of it; the cofactor is then fixed. Dividing by this bounded multiplicity provesfor a fixed and all sufficiently large .
Now work on a dyadic prime interval and let be the primes there with . Take and , so . Let be the -smooth integers at most . The density lemma gives for an absolute .
For each , every prime factor of a member of is at most and is smaller than . Hence it is a nonzero quadratic residue modulo . Multiplicativity of the Legendre symbol makes every member of a nonzero quadratic residue modulo . It therefore avoids all quadratic-nonresidue classes. In the sieve inequality set at exceptional primes and zero at every other prime up to . For odd , , soThus each dyadic interval has at most exceptional primes. The finitely many small intervals can be absorbed into this absolute bound. Summing the intervals up to proves the large-sieve logarithmic exceptional-prime bound for least quadratic nonresidues:The least nonresidue is normally defined for odd primes; any convention at the prime two changes the count by at most one.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 27 4 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Let and , the identity for Dirichlet convolution. The elementary identities needed areFor the first, prime factorization gives when , and one when . For the second, if , then , the Von Mangoldt divisor identity. Convolving the second identity with proves the third.
For , let the subscripts , , , denote truncations. The Vaughan identity isIts pointwise form isTo prove it, use and . This givesand rearrangement proves the formula, as in the Vaughan identity proof.
The Bombieri–Vinogradov theorem states that for every there is such thatHere is the Chebyshev function in an arithmetic progression, and is the Euler totient function. In particular, partial summation givesafter choosing the logarithmic saving in the weighted theorem sufficiently large and absorbing the prime power terms. This is the offset logarithmic integral function.
For the proof strategy, Orthogonality of Dirichlet characters converts errors in arithmetic progressions into character sums of Dirichlet characters weighted by . Reduction to primitive Dirichlet characters is followed by the character large sieve, which bounds their mean square by with the usual weights. The Vaughan identity separates the weighted sums into short terms, Type I sums and Type II sums. Direct inner-sum estimates handle the Type I sums; the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the large sieve control the Type II sums. The Siegel–Walfisz theorem supplies arbitrarily strong logarithmic savings for small moduli, where an average estimate alone would not suffice. A dyadic decomposition, suitable and a sufficiently large absorb the divisor and logarithmic losses. This explains why the range is essentially , with logarithmic room to spare.
Siegel–Walfisz theorem Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-14
For fixed ,uniformly for and . The implied constant may be ineffective. This small-modulus input complements the large sieve in the proof of the Bombieri–Vinogradov theorem.
Type II sum Created 2026-10-06 Updated 2026-10-07
A Type II sum has the form with two nontrivially weighted variables, both long enough for a Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and a large sieve estimate. The Vaughan identity supplies this bilinear structure for sums weighted by the Von Mangoldt function.