Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2016 iii Paper 111 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
A sufficient absolute constant is . The proof is a density increment argument for a cap set over the finite field .
First work in , write , and let be the indicator function of a cap set of subset density . All expectations below are uniform. In characteristic three, a solution of having two equal entries has all three equal. Consequently the normalized linear configuration count isSet and use Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group withThe orthogonality of roots of unity and the Parseval identity on a finite group giveIf , then for a cap set andThus some nonzero finite abelian Fourier coefficient has magnitude at least .
For this , let be the subset density of on the affine subspace , for . These three affine subspaces have equal cardinality, andAmong three directions separated by , one makes an angle at most with any given complex number. Hence . Restricting to that hyperplane gives the hyperplane density increment for cap setsTranslate the affine subspace to its underlying vector space. This preserves the cap set property: translating a triple by changes its sum by . The same argument can therefore be iterated.
For completeness, the density increment iteration gives an explicit uniform bound. If , the hypothesis is impossible. Suppose and a cap set has . For every integer , its remaining dimension is at least , and its current subset density is at least . ThusThe last inequality holds at and remains true as increases: the successive ratio of is for . At each step, as long as the subset density remains at most one,After steps this would implya contradiction. The endpoint already contradicts the cap set property in positive dimension. This proves the claimed existence of three distinct points and the Meshulam bound for cap sets.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2019 iii Paper 147 2 Solution 2026-10-03
Let and let be the balanced indicator function, extended by zero to the integers. For finitely supported functions define the linear configuration countSince has no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression, . On the other hand, . Hence, once is sufficiently large in terms of ,for an absolute .
Use the unnormalized Fourier transform on . Telescoping writes the preceding difference asLet . The Fourier-integral formula for , followed by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the Parseval identity, bounds these three terms respectively byThey are all at most , sofor an absolute . Choose with .
By the Dirichlet approximation theorem, some integer satisfies . Choose a sufficiently small absolute multiple of . Partition each residue-class progression of common difference into progressions whose lengths lie between and ; for sufficiently large , short final pieces can be joined to the preceding piece. On each , the linear phase varies by at most . Choosing small enough compared with therefore yieldsThe sums over all cells add to , so their positive parts total half their absolute values. At least one consequently satisfiesThis is the Roth density-increment step, and it giveswith and depending only on .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 iii Paper 117 4 a Solution 2026-09-28
For , writeThe orthogonality of complex exponentials converts the linear configuration count intoExpand the difference between the products for and by changing one factor at a time. A typical term iswhere each is either or . The assumed uniform norm bound controls the first factor by . The substitution preserves an integral over the circle group, so Hölder's inequality and the three supplied bounds giveEach of the four terms is therefore , and henceThis is Fourier stability of a linear configuration count.