A sufficient absolute constant is . The proof is a density increment argument for a cap set over the finite field .
First work in , write , and let be the indicator function of a cap set of subset density . All expectations below are uniform. In characteristic three, a solution of having two equal entries has all three equal. Consequently the normalized linear configuration count is
Set and use Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group with
The orthogonality of roots of unity and the Parseval identity on a finite group give
If , then for a cap set and
Thus some nonzero finite abelian Fourier coefficient has magnitude at least .
For this , let be the subset density of on the affine subspace , for . These three affine subspaces have equal cardinality, and
Among three directions separated by , one makes an angle at most with any given complex number. Hence . Restricting to that hyperplane gives the hyperplane density increment for cap sets
Translate the affine subspace to its underlying vector space. This preserves the cap set property: translating a triple by changes its sum by . The same argument can therefore be iterated.
For completeness, the density increment iteration gives an explicit uniform bound. If , the hypothesis is impossible. Suppose and a cap set has . For every integer , its remaining dimension is at least , and its current subset density is at least . Thus
The last inequality holds at and remains true as increases: the successive ratio of is for . At each step, as long as the subset density remains at most one,
After steps this would imply
a contradiction. The endpoint already contradicts the cap set property in positive dimension. This proves the claimed existence of three distinct points and the Meshulam bound for cap sets.
Let and let be the balanced indicator function, extended by zero to the integers. For finitely supported functions define the linear configuration count
Since has no nonconstant three-term arithmetic progression, . On the other hand, . Hence, once is sufficiently large in terms of ,
for an absolute .
Use the unnormalized Fourier transform on . Telescoping writes the preceding difference as
Let . The Fourier-integral formula for , followed by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the Parseval identity, bounds these three terms respectively by
They are all at most , so
for an absolute . Choose with .
By the Dirichlet approximation theorem, some integer satisfies . Choose a sufficiently small absolute multiple of . Partition each residue-class progression of common difference into progressions whose lengths lie between and ; for sufficiently large , short final pieces can be joined to the preceding piece. On each , the linear phase varies by at most . Choosing small enough compared with therefore yields
The sums over all cells add to , so their positive parts total half their absolute values. At least one consequently satisfies
This is the Roth density-increment step, and it gives
with and depending only on .
For , write
The orthogonality of complex exponentials converts the linear configuration count into
Expand the difference between the products for and by changing one factor at a time. A typical term is
where each is either or . The assumed uniform norm bound controls the first factor by . The substitution preserves an integral over the circle group, so Hölder's inequality and the three supplied bounds give
Each of the four terms is therefore , and hence
This is Fourier stability of a linear configuration count.