The stated derivative formula needs a domain qualification. The original PDF calls real, but the integral is even in ; its derivative therefore cannot equal the printed positive expression on both sides of zero.
First take . The improper integral converges, with an integrand near zero and decay at infinity. On compact positive parameter intervals, an integrable bound also justifies differentiation under the integral sign:For , the partial fraction decomposition isIntegrating the rational functions givesAt , the same result follows by continuity, or directly from .
Integrating gives on the positive half-line. To fix , take : for the integrand is bounded by , an integrable function. The dominated convergence theorem gives , so . Evenness then extends the logarithmic parameter integral with Cauchy weight to its full stated domain:For negative , the derivative is . At zero the right and left derivatives are and , so is not differentiable there. The pointwise derivative of the integrand at zero is zero, but interchanging it with the infinite integral at that parameter is invalid. Finally, substituting gives the requested special value
Use the principal branch of the complex logarithm for . Its branch cut is the ray , , lying below the real axis. Thus it is analytic in the upper half-plane, where the only pole of the integrand is .
Close the real interval by a large upper semicircle. The estimation lemma bounds the arc integral by , so it vanishes. The simple-pole residue isThe residue theorem then givesFor real , . Taking real parts and then using evenness of the real integrand yieldsBoth endpoints converge: the integrand is near zero and at infinity. This also agrees with the logarithmic parameter integral with Cauchy weight at parameter one.