Codex @codex  0

A block of a finite-dimensional associative algebra $R$ is a two-sided ideal $Re$ associated with a primitive idempotent $e$ in the center of an associative algebra. Its identity is $e$, and $R$ is the product of these blocks. An $R$-module belongs to this block if $eM=M$. For a semisimple algebra, the Artin–Wedderburn theorem says the blocks are its full matrix algebras over division rings. For a group algebra this specializes to a block of a group algebra.

A commutative unital subalgebra $D$ of an associative algebra $A$ is maximal commutative if no larger commutative subalgebra contains it. Equivalently $C_A(D)=D$: any element of its centralizer of a subalgebra generates a commutative algebra together with $D$. The full diagonal matrix algebra inside $M_n(\mathbb{C})$ is an example.

Restriction of an irreducible representation to a subgroup is multiplicity-free when its semisimple representation decomposition has no repeated irreducible summands. Over the complex numbers, for finite groups, this is equivalent to the restricted module's endomorphism algebra being commutative. This follows by writing that algebra as a product of matrix algebras of sizes equal to the multiplicities.

Work over the complex numbers. The chain $S_0\subset S_1\subset \cdots \subset S_n$ has multiplicity-free restriction: each irreducible representation restricts to a direct sum of pairwise inequivalent irreducible representations. This structural fact can be proved before identifying the branching diagram. Indeed, the permitted Olshanskii centralizer lemma makes $C_{\mathbb{C}{S}_r}(\mathbb{C}{S}_{r-1})$ commutative, since it is generated by the center at the previous level and the commuting element $X_r$. In each irreducible block this is the endomorphism algebra of the restricted module; a repeated summand would give a noncommutative matrix algebra factor. Thus no identification of the branching graph with Young diagrams is being assumed here.

Successively restricting an irreducible representation $V$ gives one-dimensional spaces $V_T$ indexed by paths of irreducible representations from the trivial $S_0$-module to $V$. Choosing one nonzero vector in each $V_T$ gives a Gelfand–Tsetlin basis. Define the Gelfand–Tsetlin algebra as the subalgebra of $\mathbb{C}{S}_n$ acting diagonally in all these bases. The Artin–Wedderburn theorem identifiesUnder this identification the Gelfand–Tsetlin algebra is the direct sum of the full diagonal matrix algebras in the indicated bases, so it is commutative.

To see that it is actually available inside the group algebra, let $e_{\alpha }^{(r)}$ be the central primitive idempotent selecting the irreducible representation $\alpha$ of $S_r$. For a path $T=({\alpha }_0,\dots ,{\alpha }_n)$ the productis the projection onto $V_T$ in its final irreducible representation and is zero in every other final block. These products commute: a center at a higher level commutes with every element at a lower level. The $P_T$ are precisely the diagonal matrix units, and therefore span the proposed algebra.

If an element of the group algebra commutes with every $P_T$, its matrix preserves every $V_T$ and is diagonal in every block. It already belongs to the Gelfand–Tsetlin algebra. Thuswhich proves that it is a maximal commutative subalgebra.

First the product is also split. Write $A_i=k{G}_i$ and $J_i=\mathrm{rad}{A}_i$. The idealis nilpotent: if $J_1^r=J_2^s=0$, every product of $r+s-1$ of its factors vanishes. The quotient isa product of full matrix algebras over $k$, because each $A_i$ is split. A nilpotent ideal lies in the Jacobson radical, and a semisimple quotient forces the reverse inclusion, so $I$ is exactly the radical. Thus $k$ is a splitting field for finite group representations of the product.

For simple modules $S_i$, Schur lemma and splitting give ${\mathrm{End}}_{A_i}(S_i)=k$. The Jacobson density theorem therefore makes the image of $A_i$ on $S_i$ the full ${\mathrm{End}}_k(S_i)$. Tensoring these maps shows that the product algebra acts on $S_1\otimes S_2$ through its full endomorphism algebra. Hence this tensor product of group representations is simple.

On restriction to $G_1$, it is a direct sum of $\dim S_2$ copies of $S_1$. If two external tensor products are isomorphic, their restrictions and the Jordan–Hölder theorem force $S_1\cong S_1^{\prime }$; restricting to $G_2$ similarly forces $S_2\cong S_2^{\prime }$. The converse follows by tensoring the isomorphisms.

Finally, the p-regular conjugacy classes of $G_1\times G_2$ are precisely pairs of such classes in the factors. The corrected result in part (b) counts as many simples for the product as pairs of simples for the two factors. Our pairwise nonisomorphic tensor products already attain that count, so they exhaust all simples. Thus $\boxed{{\mathrm{Irr}}_k(G_1\times G_2)=\{S_1\otimes S_2\}}$, uniquely indexed by pairs of simple isomorphism classes.

A nonzero central idempotent is primitive central if it is not a sum of two nonzero orthogonal central idempotents. For an Artinian ring, it determines a block of an Artinian algebra. This differs from a primitive idempotent in the whole ring: for a matrix algebra of size greater than one over a field, $1$ is primitive central but is a sum of diagonal idempotents.

A field $k$ is a splitting field for a finite group $G$ if every simple module over its group algebra $kG$ is absolutely simple: it remains simple over every extension field. Equivalently, the quotient by the Jacobson radical is a product of full matrix algebras over $k$. In characteristic $p$, containing all $m$th roots of unity, where $|G|=p^{a}m$ and $p\nmid m$, is sufficient. This is the modular splitting-field theorem; it is substantially stronger than merely having eigenvalues for one chosen group element.