The geostrophic material derivative is
It advects horizontally with the geostrophic flow. The exact material derivative additionally includes horizontal ageostrophic flow and vertical advection . The leading balances are geostrophic balance and the hydrostatic approximation:
The conventional quasi-geostrophic streamfunction is , after fixing the horizontally uniform reference pressure consistently with the basic buoyancy profile. Therefore
Here and below pressure is divided by reference density, and is the anomaly about the prescribed background buoyancy.
For the zonal average assume periodicity or vanishing boundary terms, so that averages of derivatives vanish and averaging commutes with derivatives. Put . Since , the disturbance quasi-geostrophic potential vorticity is . The zonal part of vanishes as . For the other parts, integration by parts gives
As , , and , the Eliassen–Palm flux is
We have therefore proved the exact Taylor identity for quasi-geostrophic flux,
without imposing small amplitude. This identity is algebraic within the quasi-geostrophic approximation; it does not assert validity of that approximation for arbitrary physical flows.
Now linearize about a steady zonal basic flow , with and no mean meridional velocity. The linear quasi-geostrophic potential-vorticity equation is . Multiply by and average. The advection term is a zonal derivative and vanishes, giving
This is quasi-geostrophic wave-activity conservation law. The basic-state denominator is time-independent at the retained order; its change caused by the waves is higher order. The wave activity is signed if , and the formula cannot be used where that gradient vanishes. The original PDF includes the zonal average over the squared disturbance in this definition.
For the resonant solution it is helpful to avoid squaring an imaginary coefficient as though it were real. Write
where is real. Assume , , and . Define and . The complex coefficient of the physical streamfunction disturbance is
The original PDF contains : the converted TeX's missing would incorrectly remove the resonance and fails the differential equations.
For the vertical potential-vorticity inversion operator, and . Consequently
Substitution in the linear potential-vorticity equation gives
since . Thus this is a genuine resonant topographic quasi-geostrophic wave, with linear amplitude growth rather than an assumed stationary wave.
At the flat upper boundary , so . At the lower boundary, linearization of the impermeability condition gives , where is the bottom corrugation. Here is time-independent, so the specified vertical velocity gives
using . Both boundary conditions are verified. The linear solution is valid while its growing displacement and velocity remain small; it is not a large-time nonlinear solution.
To evaluate all fluxes, use . The coefficients of are respectively , , and . Hence
The products of the terms alone and the terms alone are imaginary in the vertical flux and contribute nothing. Only the cross terms remain. Since
we obtain
Differentiating gives . As ,
For an independent evaluation of the right side of the Taylor identity for quasi-geostrophic flux, write . Multiplication of by gives real part , because the remaining real cross terms cancel. Therefore
which verifies the flux identity pointwise in .
The basic potential-vorticity gradient is , so the wave activity and its derivative are
Here follows from . Thus . The growth term involves ; the distinction matters because the printed complex coefficient is imaginary. These formulas evaluate both flux components, their divergence, the buoyancy and PV covariances, and wave activity. In particular and , so for the growing activity is supplied by the positive flux from the lower boundary.
Finally put and write the height-independent mean velocity change as . Since and can be chosen independent of height, the mean potential vorticity becomes
To be uniform in this requires for some constant . Integrating and applying both endpoint conditions gives , , and hence . Therefore
The constant is the initial channel-mean potential vorticity, as also follows from . This is the momentum loss from uniform potential-vorticity mixing. Averaging the velocity change across the channel gives the momentum change per unit mass,
For positive the mean current is reduced everywhere in the interior. The imposed bottom can exchange momentum with the fluid, so this change is consistent with the complete conservation of momentum budget.