Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 105 2 b iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The positive uniform ellipticity condition from part (i) is needed here. It is not explicitly imposed in the printed preamble. Without it the conclusion is false: on , take , , and . The Neumann boundary condition is satisfied by , and for arbitrarily large shifts.
There is also an actual error in the PDF's supplied trace inequality: a nonzero constant has nonzero trace and zero gradient. Use instead the valid multiplicative trace inequality on a bounded smooth domainFor completeness, choose a smooth vector field agreeing with the outward normal vector on the boundary. The divergence theorem gives, for smooth ,Approximation and the Sobolev trace theorem extend it to . Thus the intended existence result remains true after correcting the hint.
Set , , , , andUniform ellipticity and the Young inequality giveFor , the bilinear form is coercive on the real Hilbert space with coercivity constant .
All coefficients are bounded, and the Sobolev trace theorem gives . The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality applied to each volume and boundary term therefore proves . Also is a continuous linear functional, with . Every hypothesis of the Lax-Milgram theorem is now verified, and it gives
Weak Robin problem for a uniformly elliptic operator Created 2026-10-05 Updated 2026-10-06
For with smooth coefficients on a bounded smooth domain, the weak formulation of and conormal Robin boundary condition isThe bilinear form is bounded by the Sobolev trace theorem. If satisfy the positive uniformly elliptic operator inequality, the multiplicative trace inequality on a bounded smooth domain and the Young inequality show that the form is coercive when is sufficiently large, even if and have negative parts. The Lax-Milgram theorem then gives a unique weak solution for every .