Cyclicity of a product of two finite cyclic groups Created 2026-10-14 Updated 2026-10-20
For positive integers , two finite cyclic groups combine into one cyclic group precisely when their group orders are coprime:The reason is that both cyclic counters must return to their identity elements simultaneously. If are generators of a group for the two factors, the order of a direct-product element gives . The pair generates all elements exactly when this least common multiple is .
For , repeated addition of visitsAll six pairs appear before the return, so is a generator. In contrast, in the same step gives only . Every nonidentity element has order of a group element two, so none can generate all four pairs. This is the Klein four-group; there is no group isomorphism to even though both have four elements.
For a brief proof of the converse, each component order of a group element divides the corresponding factor group order. Every pair's order therefore divides . If , this is smaller than , so no pair can generate the whole product. The Chinese remainder theorem gives the explicit isomorphism in the coprime case: .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 ia Paper 3 5D Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The order of a group element is the least positive integer with , or infinity if none exists. In a finite group, some two powers among coincide; cancellation then gives a positive power equal to , so exists. The generated cyclic group consists of the distinct elements and has size .
We now prove the needed divisibility directly by cosets. Multiplication by bijects with the left coset , so every left coset has elements. If and intersect, write with . Then , which implies . Thus distinct left cosets are disjoint, and every element of belongs to its own left coset. The finite set is partitioned into, say, such cosets. Hence andThis supplies the counting argument underlying Lagrange's theorem, rather than appealing to it or to an unproved orbit formula.
A divisor of need not occur as an element order. Use , of order eight, and . Every element has square equal to the identity, so there is no element of order four. Thus the proposed converse is false, even for an abelian group.
For the direct product of groups , let generate the factors. The least for which is the least common multiple of . If are coprime, this is , the size of the whole product, so generates every element. Conversely, for any pair its order is and divides . If , that bound is , so no element can generate the product. ThereforeThis is the cyclicity of a product of two finite cyclic groups; the general pair-order criterion is the order of a direct-product element.
In additive notation every element obeys . Its order of a group element therefore divides four, whereas has order eight. A group isomorphism preserves element orders, soFor the second product, define the group homomorphismIt is well-defined because multiples of six are divisible by both two and three. Its kernel contains only zero: simultaneous divisibility by two and three implies divisibility by six. Thus is injective, and equal finite group orders make it surjective. Explicitly the six images areThereforeFor general positive integers , the order of a direct-product element is the least common multiple of its component orders. Hence every element order divides , while attains this order. It generates the whole product precisely when are coprime:This is the cyclicity of a product of two finite cyclic groups, with the explicit isomorphism furnished by the Chinese remainder theorem.
