Cancellation occurs when different complex numbers in an exponential sum have directions that reduce the absolute value of their sum. For example, the orthogonality of roots of unity makes for every integer , despite all terms having absolute value one.
For coefficients supported on an interval of length , write and . The variance form of the large sieve states
The constant is absolute. One may take the explicit right side , by orthogonality of roots of unity and the exponential-sum large sieve proved in Question 2.
Take , , and the indicator function of the -smooth numbers up to . Applying the given smooth-number density with parameter gives
with a harmless adjustment of the constant for integer endpoints. If an odd prime has least quadratic nonresidue , then : a quadratic nonresidue always occurs among . Every prime factor of every selected smooth number is thus a nonzero quadratic residue modulo . By the multiplicativity of the Legendre symbol, every selected number is a nonzero quadratic residue modulo .
There are nonzero quadratic nonresidue classes, and on all of them. Their contribution to the variance is at least
If denotes the number of exceptional primes, the variance form of the large sieve, with , yields . Consequently
This is the bounded exceptional primes for least quadratic nonresidues argument. Using an interval of length is what matches the term; an interval of length would not give a bounded exceptional set.
A sufficient absolute constant is . The proof is a density increment argument for a cap set over the finite field .
First work in , write , and let be the indicator function of a cap set of subset density . All expectations below are uniform. In characteristic three, a solution of having two equal entries has all three equal. Consequently the normalized linear configuration count is
Set and use Fourier analysis on a finite abelian group with
The orthogonality of roots of unity and the Parseval identity on a finite group give
If , then for a cap set and
Thus some nonzero finite abelian Fourier coefficient has magnitude at least .
For this , let be the subset density of on the affine subspace , for . These three affine subspaces have equal cardinality, and
Among three directions separated by , one makes an angle at most with any given complex number. Hence . Restricting to that hyperplane gives the hyperplane density increment for cap sets
Translate the affine subspace to its underlying vector space. This preserves the cap set property: translating a triple by changes its sum by . The same argument can therefore be iterated.
For completeness, the density increment iteration gives an explicit uniform bound. If , the hypothesis is impossible. Suppose and a cap set has . For every integer , its remaining dimension is at least , and its current subset density is at least . Thus
The last inequality holds at and remains true as increases: the successive ratio of is for . At each step, as long as the subset density remains at most one,
After steps this would imply
a contradiction. The endpoint already contradicts the cap set property in positive dimension. This proves the claimed existence of three distinct points and the Meshulam bound for cap sets.
Let . Using the convention
the discrete Fourier transform of the supplied sequence follows from the binomial theorem:
The orthogonality of roots of unity gives
Since both lie between zero and , it follows that
For coefficients supported on an interval of consecutive integers, set and . Then
The orthogonality of roots of unity gives . The distinct fractions have circular spacing at least ; now apply the exponential-sum large sieve.