Fitting subgroup 2026-10-14
The largest nilpotent normal subgroup of a finite group . If denotes its p-core, distinct p-cores commute, and . Every normal nilpotent group has Sylow subgroups which are characteristic subgroups, so it is contained in this product.
Fitting subgroup centralizes the socle 2026-10-14
For a finite group, centralizes its group socle. A nonabelian minimal normal subgroup meets trivially: otherwise it is nilpotent, and its nontrivial characteristic center makes it abelian. Their group commutators therefore vanish. An abelian minimal normal subgroup is an elementary abelian p-group; and by the fixed-point counting of a finite p-group on . Minimal normality makes , and other p-cores commute with .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 2 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The Frattini subgroup is the intersection of the maximal subgroups of , with . A useful equivalent property isIndeed, a proper subgroup lies in a maximal subgroup, which also contains . The Frattini subgroup is a characteristic subgroup, since automorphisms permute the maximal subgroups.
The Fitting subgroup is the largest nilpotent normal subgroup. To prove its existence, first form the p-core : the product of all normal p-subgroups. For two such subgroups, their product is normal and has order , a power of . There are only finitely many subgroups, so exists. For distinct primes ,Thus the product of the p-cores is a nilpotent normal subgroup, a direct product of groups of its Sylow subgroups. Conversely, a finite nilpotent normal subgroup has unique Sylow subgroups, each a characteristic subgroup of . Each is normal in and lies in the corresponding p-core. Consequently the required largest subgroup exists, and
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 2 1 d Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
It suffices to centralize each minimal normal subgroup . The subgroup is normal in , so it is either or . In the first caseIn the second case is a nilpotent group. Its nontrivial group center is a characteristic subgroup of , hence normal in , so minimality makes abelian. The primary components, which are characteristic subgroups, and the subgroup killed by a prime show that is elementary abelian of exponent . Thus .
The finite p-group acts by conjugation on . Its orbits have prime-power sizes; hence the number of fixed elements is congruent to modulo . The identity is fixed, so there is a nonidentity fixed element. Therefore . This intersection is normal in , and minimality makes it . The other p-cores commute with , and hence with . Thus every factor of centralizes . Since the group socle is generated by these minimal normal subgroups,
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2004 iii Paper 5 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Take finite-dimensional modules over and finite -free lattices over the complete valuation ring, the usual integral modular representation theory convention. If a completion has several local factors, use the factor supporting the modular block. A block of a group algebra is an indecomposable two-sided ideal , where is a primitive central idempotent. The identity decomposes as the sum of orthogonal block idempotents, and for every module. Hence an indecomposable module belongs to exactly when .
A defect group of a block in characteristic is a maximal p-subgroup with . Equivalently, it is minimal with ; the trace criterion for defect groups and conjugacy are proved below. For a complete discrete valuation ring, use the corresponding reduced modular block; modular reduction of block idempotents preserves its defect groups. The equivalent bimodule description says that the module vertices of , with acting by , are conjugates of . This basic characterization follows from the relative-projectivity trace criterion for the bimodule action.
Fix a Sylow subgroup containing . The regular group algebra is the permutation module for , and multiplication by is its block projection. Restriction to a subgroup containing a chosen module vertex retains a summand with that module vertex: a module source at that module vertex is a summand of the module restriction, and the Mackey restriction formula and minimality prevent all the restricted summands from having smaller module vertices. Thus has an indecomposable summand with module vertex .
For a finite p-group , the transitive permutation module is indecomposable: the group algebra of a p-group in characteristic p is local, and this module has a one-dimensional top, incompatible with a sum of two nonzero modules. Its module vertex is , because it is induced from the trivial -module and its Brauer quotient of a module at has the nonzero fixed coset . The fixed-basis rule for this quotient follows by removing nonsingleton orbit sums, which are proper-subgroup traces. It excludes a smaller module vertex. Reduction gives the same statements for permutation lattices. Therefore Krull-Schmidt decomposition identifies the chosen block summand with an entire transitive orbit in .
Choose a point in that orbit whose stabilizer is exactly . Being fixed by every gives . Its full stabilizer isEquality with gives . Conjugating, and using that centralizes , provesThis is defect groups are centralizer-conjugate Sylow intersections.
If is a p-subgroup, then is a p-subgroup for every Sylow , so . It lies in both Sylow factors above. Thus every normal p-subgroup of is contained in .
Finally put , choose , and extend it to a Sylow of . Then and . Apply the proved intersection result to this . Its element belongs to , so is Sylow in too. Hence . The p-core is contained in both factors, whereas normality of in gives the opposite inclusion. Therefore , so is a p-radical subgroup. The centralizer condition on the conjugating element is important for this deduction.
p-radical subgroup 2026-10-14
A p-subgroup is p-radical if it equals the p-core of its normalizer. Every defect group of a block is p-radical by defect groups are centralizer-conjugate Sylow intersections. Being an intersection of arbitrary Sylow subgroups alone is weaker than the centralizer-conjugate statement used in that argument.