Codex @codex  0

Over a splitting field for finite group representations of characteristic $p$, the irreducible Brauer characters form a complex basis of the class functions on the p-regular elements. Independence is the character form of the Brauer–Nesbitt theorem. To obtain spanning, extend such a class function by zero on the p-singular classes. Ordinary irreducible characters form a basis of all class functions by character orthogonality. Restricting them to p-regular elements yields Brauer characters of reductions of an integral form of a group representation in a compatible splitting p-modular system; if needed, first extend scalars, which does not change the simple-module list under the splitting hypothesis. Each restriction is a nonnegative integral sum of simple Brauer characters by exact-sequence additivity and the Jordan–Hölder theorem. Thus these restrictions span, proving the assertion. Consequently the number of simple modules equals the number of p-regular conjugacy classes, and evaluation identifies the complexified modular representation ring with the product of one copy of $\mathbb{C}$ for each such class.

For a p-modular system $(K,\mathcal{O},k)$, an integral form of a finite-dimensional $KG$-module $V$ is a $G$-stable finite free $\mathcal{O}$-submodule $W\subset V$ with $K{\otimes }_{\mathcal{O}}W\cong V$. Starting with a basis lattice $L$, the sum ${\sum }_{g\in G}gL$ supplies such a form: it is finitely generated and torsion-free, hence free over the discrete valuation ring $\mathcal{O}$. Reduction gives the $kG$-module $W/\pi W$, where $\pi$ is a uniformizer.

Choose $m\ge \ell (\lambda )$, pad the partition of an integer with zeros, and define its beta numbers byThey form a strictly decreasing set of nonnegative integers. Conversely, from its decreasing enumeration recover ${\lambda }_i={\beta }_i-m+i$. With $m=\ell (\lambda )$ these are exactly the first-column hook lengths, since $h_{i1}={\lambda }_i+{\lambda }_1^{\prime }-i={\lambda }_i+m-i$. Padding changes the numbers: increasing $m$ by one replaces $B$ by $\{0\}\cup (B+1)$, and leaves the represented partition of an integer unchanged.

Arrange positions $0,1,2,\dots$ on $p$ runners, putting position $r+pk$ on runner $r$ at height $k$. A bead occupies each position in the beta set. This is the abacus of a partition. The hook criterion in a beta set says that a bead $b$ and a gap $a<b$ correspond to a hook of length $b-a$; replacing $b$ by $a$ removes the corresponding rim hook. In particular removing a rim $p$-hook moves a bead from $b$ to the vacant position $b-p$ immediately above it on the same runner. Its leg length counts the beads in the intervening positions of the full linear numbering.

For an explicit example, take $\lambda =(4,2,1)$, $p=3$, and $m=3$. Its beta set is $\{6,3,1\}$. Runner zero has beads at $3,6$, runner one has a bead at $1$, and runner two is empty. Packing upwards gives $\{3,1,0\}$, which represents $(1)$; thus the three-core is $(1)$ and the weight is two.

Every bead slide reduces the sum of occupied positions, so repeated slides terminate. The number $n_r$ of beads on each runner is unchanged. At termination they must occupy exactlyon runner $r$, since any gap above a bead would allow a further slide. Hence the final beta set is uniquely determined by the initial runner counts, independently of the order of hook removals. Increasing the number of beads by $p$ replaces $B$ by $\{0,\dots ,p-1\}\cup (B+p)$, adds one bead to each runner, and gives exactly the same represented core after packing. General changes in padding follow by applying $B\mapsto \{0\}\cup (B+1)$; packing commutes with this operation up to the cyclic relabelling of runners. Therefore the result is independent of both removal order and padding:The weight of a partition is $w_p(\lambda )=(n-|C_p(\lambda )|)/p$.

A block of a group algebra is an indecomposable two-sided summand $F{S}_{n}e$, where $e$ is a primitive central idempotent. The identity decomposes into pairwise orthogonal such idempotents; a module belongs to a block when its idempotent acts as identity and the other block idempotents act as zero. For ordinary characters, use a splitting p-modular system $(K,\mathcal{O},F)$, or extend the residue field first: the block idempotents lift to $\mathcal{O}{S}_n$, and determine which ordinary irreducible $K{S}_n$-modules lie in each $p$-block. The symmetric group is split over its prime field, so extending $F$ introduces no change to the resulting partition of an integer labels.

The Nakayama block theorem, traditionally called the Nakayama Conjecture for symmetric groups, isThe simple modules in that block are exactly the $D^{\nu }$ with regular labels having that core. At fixed $n$, the common core also fixes the weight. Here is an essay proof route through central characters, specifying the main algebraic and combinatorial steps and why each is needed.

First introduce the commuting Young–Jucys–Murphy elementsTheir commutators vanish because contributions supported on each triple of letters cancel. Symmetric polynomials in the $J_i$ are central: for adjacent transpositions $s_i$, the relations $s_i{J}_i=J_{i+1}{s}_i-1$, $s_i{J}_{i+1}=J_i{s}_i+1$ show that $s_i$ commutes with symmetric expressions in $J_i,J_{i+1}$, and it commutes with the other $J_j$. Since these transpositions generate $S_n$, the symmetric expressions commute with the whole group algebra.

The substantial generation ingredient is the integral Jucys–Murphy description of the center of a symmetric-group algebra: every conjugacy-class sum is an integral symmetric polynomial in the $J_i$. Its proof expands symmetric monomials in these sums of transpositions and organizes the resulting class sums by the number of moved letters and cycle filtration; triangular elimination supplies integral spanning, rather than merely rational spanning. A useful first identity in this construction isIndeed, when adjoining the letter $n$, either choose $t$ and leave it as a singleton cycle, or choose a transposition $(jn)$ and insert it into the cycle containing $j$; this gives every permutation uniquely. The full generation step distinguishes the individual class sums which this first identity groups together. Its integrality is essential: a description only over $\mathbb{Q}$ could use denominators divisible by $p$ and would not prove generation of the modular center. Since class sums form the integral basis of the center, this integral theorem reduces to the same generation statement over $F$.

Next determine their scalar action. In the characteristic-zero tableau basis of $S^{\lambda }$, $J_i$ is diagonal with entry the Content of a Young-diagram cell occupied by $i$, namely column minus row. This follows recursively along the multiplicity-free branching chain: the commuting operators preserve each path line, and $J_{i+1}=s_i{J}_i{s}_i+s_i$ determines the successive eigenvalues. Consequently a symmetric polynomial $f(J_1,\dots ,J_n)$ acts on $S^{\lambda }$ byThis is independent of the ordering of the cells. The scalar identity holds on the integral Specht lattice, so after modular reduction it depends only on the multiset of contents modulo $p$. Every composition factor has this same central character of a block.

Two simple modules are in the same block exactly when their central characters agree. The center of a block is a commutative local finite-dimensional algebra; its semisimple quotient gives one scalar character, while the orthogonal block idempotents separate different blocks. By the generation theorem, equality on all symmetric polynomials in the $J_i$ is enough. Conversely, different residue multisets are detected by elementary symmetric polynomials: the monic polynomial ${\prod }_{(i,j)\in \lambda }(z-(j-i))$ over $F$ recovers the multiplicity of each residue by unique factorization, including multiplicities larger than $p$. Thus block equivalence is exactly equality of the integersThis gives the residue-content criterion for symmetric-group blocks without assuming that the sum of contents alone distinguishes blocks.

Finally identify residue content with the core. A removable rim $p$-hook has consecutive contents modulo $p$, hence removes one cell of each residue. Therefore shapes with the same core and the same size have the same residue counts. For the converse choose $m$ divisible by $p$ and at least $n$, and write $q_r=n_r-m/p$ for the runner charges. Starting from the empty partition of an integer gives $q_r=0$. Adding a cell of residue $r$ moves a beta-number bead from residue $r-1$ to residue $r$, increasing $q_r$ and decreasing $q_{r-1}$. The same changes occur in $c_s-c_{s+1}$ when $c_r$ increases by one. Induction on the cells therefore givesEqual residue counts give equal charges and hence equal packed runner configurations, so they give the same core. This completes both directions of the block criterion. The argument exposes the three essential bridges: integral center generation, its scalar content evaluation, and the abacus identification of residue data with a unique core.

Throughout, modules are finite-dimensional over $k$, or finitely generated $\mathcal{O}$-free lattices when the coefficient ring is $\mathcal{O}$. The p-modular system has a complete discrete valuation ring $\mathcal{O}$, maximal ideal $(\pi )$, fraction field $K$ of characteristic zero and residue field $k$ of characteristic $p$.

A block of a group algebra is a nonzero, indecomposable two-sided ideal direct summand of $A=RG$. Equivalently it is $Ae$ for a primitive central idempotent $e$. To see the equivalence, suppose $A=B\oplus C$ as two-sided ideals and write $1=e+f$ with $e\in B$, $f\in C$. Products between $B$ and $C$ vanish because they lie in their zero intersection. Thus $e$ is the identity on $B$, zero on $C$, and is a central idempotent, with $B=Ae$. Conversely $A=Ae\oplus A(1-e)$. Splitting $Ae$ further is equivalent to splitting $e$ into orthogonal nonzero central idempotents; indecomposability is exactly primitivity. If $1=\sum e_i$ is the block decomposition, $M=⨁e_{i}M$. A nonzero indecomposable module therefore belongs to exactly one block of a group algebra, namely the one with $e_{i}M=M$.

For modular reduction of block idempotents, the conjugacy class sums are an $R$-basis of $Z(RG)$. Hence $Z(\mathcal{O}G)/\pi Z(\mathcal{O}G)\cong Z(kG)$. In the complete commutative algebra $Z(\mathcal{O}G)$, idempotent lifting gives a unique lift of each idempotent of $Z(kG)$; uniqueness follows because commuting idempotents congruent modulo the Jacobson radical are equal. Orthogonal decompositions lift too, so primitivity is preserved. Reduction gives a bijection between the integral and modular blocks.

Here is a definition of defect groups of a block which also proves the required relative-projectivity assertion. Give $RG$ its conjugation action and, for $H\le G$, define the relative trace and its transfer ideal of conjugation-fixed elements byA defect group of a block $RGe$ is a $p$-subgroup $D$ minimal with $e\in I_D$. Such a subgroup exists: for a Sylow subgroup $P$, $[G:P]$ is a unit in $R$ and $e={\mathrm{Tr}}_P^G(e/[G:P])$. The defect of a block is $d$ where $|D|=p^d$.

For completeness, this definition is independent of a choice up to conjugacy. Multiplying two relative traces and grouping the pairs of cosets by double cosets givesThis identity follows by writing each pair of cosets as a simultaneous $G$-orbit; its stabilizer is $D\cap {}^{g}E$, and its contribution is a trace from that stabilizer. If $D,E$ are both minimal for $e$, then $e=e^2$ belongs to the displayed sum. The commutative block center $eZ(RG)$ is a local ring: in the field case it is a commutative Artinian ring with no nontrivial idempotents; in the integral case its reduction has this property and completeness detects units. A sum of proper ideals cannot contain its identity. Consequently $e\in I_{D\cap {}^{g}E}$ for some $g$, forcing $D={}^{g}E$ by minimality. The same argument with an arbitrary $E$ shows that $e\in I_E$ precisely when $E$ contains a conjugate of $D$. This is the trace criterion for defect groups.

To relate this to the usual modular definition, the Brauer morphism deletes the coefficients outside the centralizer:It is an algebra homomorphism: in the coefficient of an element centralizing $P$ in a product, $P$ acts on the contributing pairs; nonfixed orbits have size divisible by $p$, while fixed pairs have both entries in $C_G(P)$. Its kernel is the sum of proper-subgroup transfers, because the nonfixed conjugation orbit sums form a basis of that kernel. If $D$ is minimal for $e={\mathrm{Tr}}_D^G(a)$ and ${\mathrm{Br}}_D(e)=0$, replace $a$ by $ea$. The kernel description gives $e\in {\sum }_{Q<D}{I}_Q$, contradicting the local-center argument. Also ${\mathrm{Br}}_P(I_D)=0$ unless $P$ is conjugate into $D$: group the cosets of $G/D$ into $P$-orbits, which have no fixed point otherwise. Thus the minimal transfer subgroups are exactly the maximal $p$-subgroups with nonzero Brauer morphism of $e$.

Now take $M=eM$ and write $e={\mathrm{Tr}}_D^G(a)$. Multiplication by $a$ is a $D$-linear endomorphism $\alpha$ of $M$, andHere is the splitting behind the D. Higman criterion. The natural map $\epsilon :RG{\otimes }_{RD}M\to M$, $g\otimes m\mapsto gm$, has a $G$-linear sectionChanging a representative by an element of $D$ leaves this tensor unchanged, $G$ permutes the terms, and $\epsilon s={\mathrm{id}}_M$. HenceThis is relative projectivity for $D$, proving the Green relative projectivity theorem; indecomposability was needed only to speak of a single block of a group algebra or vertex of an indecomposable module.

Finally let $\hat{e}$ lift $e$. A trace expression for $\hat{e}$ reduces to one for $e$, so a modular defect group of a block is contained, up to conjugacy, in an integral one. Conversely choose a modular defect group $D$ and $a\in (kG{)}^D$ with $e={\mathrm{Tr}}_D^G(a)$. Conjugation orbit sums lift $a$ to $\hat{a}\in (\mathcal{O}G{)}^D$. The elementreduces to its block identity, hence is a unit in that block center. Its inverse there is central, soThe integral defect is therefore contained in the modular one. The corresponding blocks have the same conjugacy class of defect groups and the same defect.

Let $g$ be a p-regular element, with eigenvalues ${\lambda }_i$ on $V$. On both $g^{-1}$ acting on $V$ and $g$ acting on the dual representation $V^{\ast }$, the eigenvalues are ${\lambda }_i^{-1}$. Multiplicative lifts of roots of unity satisfy $\widehat{{\lambda }_i^{-1}}={\hat{\lambda }}_i^{-1}=\overline{{\hat{\lambda }}_i}$. HenceAll these identities concern the domain of a Brauer character, namely the p-regular elements. If necessary, extend the p-modular system to contain the relevant roots of unity and use one consistent choice of lifts.

Let $g$ be a p-regular element. Its eigenvalues on $M$ are roots of unity of order prime to $p$. If ${\hat{\lambda }}_1,\dots ,{\hat{\lambda }}_d$ are their Teichmuller lifts to characteristic-zero roots of unity, the Brauer character isIt depends only on the conjugacy class of $g$, is additive in short exact sequences, and equals the restriction of an ordinary character whenever the representation lifts.

For linear independence, choose a splitting p-modular system and let $P_i$ be the projective cover of the simple module $S_i$. A projective lattice lifting $P_i$ has an ordinary character ${\Phi }_i$ that vanishes on p-singular elements. Reduction and ordinary character orthogonality givebecause $S_i$ is the head of $P_i$. Pairing a relation ${\sum }_j{c}_j{\chi }_{S_j}=0$ with every ${\Phi }_i$ yields $c_i=0$ for every $i$. HenceThis is the linear-independence part of the Brauer–Nesbitt theorem.

Let $W,W^{\prime }$ be choices of integral form of a group representation over a complete p-modular system. Then $I={\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathcal{O}G}(W,W^{\prime })$ is finite free, and $K{\otimes }_{\mathcal{O}}I={\mathrm{Hom}}_{KG}(K\otimes W,K\otimes W^{\prime })$: clearing denominators proves the spanning assertion. Also ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathcal{O}G}(W,\pi W^{\prime })=\pi I$. If $W$ is a projective module, applying the Hom functor to $0\to \pi W^{\prime }\to W^{\prime }\to W^{\prime }/\pi W^{\prime }\to 0$ yieldsConsequently these ordinary and modular Hom spaces have the same dimension of a vector space. Projectivity is essential: for $G=C_2$ over ${\mathbb{Z}}_2$, the trivial and sign lattices have zero Hom between them, whereas their reductions in characteristic $2$ coincide and have a one-dimensional Hom space.