Write , and . The first correction in the inner expansion satisfies . Direct differentiation verifies that is a particular solution. Adding the constant and error function homogeneous solutions gives .
The left boundary condition forces . Re-expanding the outer expansion at gives
Therefore , with no constant term in its large- overlap. Since and , this sets . Thus the required half-order correction is
It vanishes at zero and has the correct linear overlap. Keeping this term is essential even though the outer solution has no correction of that order.
For either scalar equation, the complementary solution is
so initial velocity transients decay when . In the exact corrected forced dust epicycle with aerodynamic drag, is a particular solution, and the original radial equation then gives . Consequently
This is resonant dust entrainment by an epicyclic gas wave: in the adopted long-wavelength gas approximation, the forcing is a free epicycle of the dust too, so matching the gas makes the drag zero. The convergence holds for every in this linear model; at transients never decay, so the zero-drag and late-time limits do not commute.
If instead the printed scalar equation is treated literally for finite , its particular solution is
It has amplitude and phase offset , not exact phase/amplitude agreement. Agreement in that truncated equation means only leading order as . This distinguishes the intended approximation from a false exact reading of the printed assertion.
There is a further order-of-limits condition: a real finite-wavelength gas wave has . Leading resonant entrainment over the damping time requires , or . Otherwise solve the dust transfer equations at the actual ; detuning can reduce the dust response even though .
The identity
shows that is a particular solution. Combining it with the homogeneous solution from part (b) gives
The condition gives , and gives . Hence
The exact initial-value solution is . Since ,
Thus the absolute endpoint error is , consistent with the second-order truncation error of the centred scheme.
The homogeneous solution is
For the constant and forcing terms, a particular solution is
Indeed, applying multiplies the coefficient by . Thus
The term only changes the definition of at this order, so one may set .
For , subtracting an appropriate homogeneous solution from the particular solution removes its apparent singularity as . The resulting derivative in the parameter produces the resonant particular solution . The arbitrary constant must be reparametrized before taking the limit.