absolute convergence depends only on , since . Let be the set of real for which converges. Comparison with a convergent member shows that is upward closed. The hypotheses give a member of and a real number outside , so its infimum is finite. If , some lies below , giving convergence by comparison; if , convergence would contradict the definition of the infimum. Thus is the abscissa of absolute convergence of a Dirichlet series. This argument leaves convergence on the boundary open.
Partition according to . Writing identifies the part indexed by with the integers coprime to . There are of them. Counting the entire partition proves the totient divisor-sum identity
We use the multiplication theorem for absolutely convergent Dirichlet series: their product is the Dirichlet series of the Dirichlet convolution of their coefficients. absolute convergence justifies rearrangement of the double sum. Here , so its series converges absolutely for , and
The Euler product implies for . Division gives
We finally use the simple pole of the Riemann zeta function at one, of residue one, and . The quotient therefore tends to as real . If converged, its nonnegative terms would dominate the series at every real , giving a uniform finite bound and a contradiction. Thus the series diverges at two; comparison then excludes absolute convergence at every . Combined with the convergence already proved, the abscissa is exactly two. This is the totient Dirichlet series and its absolute convergence boundary.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.