Write , making explicit that these are subsets of . If and is an open neighbourhood of , then is compact and hence closed in . The open set still contains and meets the dense image of . Such an intersection point belongs to , so for every .
Conversely, if choose an integer . Since is an embedding, there is an open neighbourhood of in whose intersection with is . It misses , so . HenceFor the two ends of a real-line compactification, let and . Each is nonempty compact and connected, being the closure of a connected image. The two nested families therefore have nonempty connected intersections and . Since closure commutes with finite unions, . MoreoverFor if a point fails both intersections, it fails one positive member and one negative member, hence both members at the larger index by nesting.
If the remainder were a finite three-point set, its Hausdorff subspace topology would be discrete. Each nonempty connected subset would then be a singleton, so their union would have at most two points. This contradiction proves there is no three-point Hausdorff compactification of the real line. The argument does not assert that every possible remainder is finite.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.